LoopBack vs StrongLoop

Overview

StrongLoop

Stacks15

Followers34

Votes0

LoopBack

Stacks285

Followers556

Votes33

GitHub Stars13.2K

Forks1.2K

LoopBack vs StrongLoop: What are the differences?

Introduction LoopBack and StrongLoop are both frameworks that are used for developing applications, but they have key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will highlight and explain six main differences between LoopBack and StrongLoop.

Dependence on Node.js: LoopBack is built on top of Node.js, which means it relies on Node.js for its core functionality. StrongLoop, on the other hand, is the company behind LoopBack and provides additional tools and services on top of the LoopBack framework. Therefore, while LoopBack is dependent on Node.js, StrongLoop offers a more comprehensive set of tools and services.
Ease of Use: LoopBack is designed to make it easy for developers to quickly build APIs and microservices. It provides a high-level abstraction that simplifies the development process and reduces the amount of code required. StrongLoop, on the other hand, focuses on providing a set of tools and services that help developers manage and scale their LoopBack applications. This means that while LoopBack offers simplicity, StrongLoop offers more advanced features for managing and scaling applications.
Community Support: LoopBack has a large and active community of developers who contribute to its development. This means that there is a wealth of resources and knowledge available to developers using LoopBack. StrongLoop, on the other hand, provides commercial support and consulting services for LoopBack. While LoopBack has a strong community, StrongLoop offers more specialized support for developers.
Enterprise Support: LoopBack is suitable for building small to medium-sized applications, but it may not be ideal for large enterprise-level projects. StrongLoop, on the other hand, offers enterprise-level support and services that are specifically designed to meet the needs of large-scale projects. This includes features such as performance monitoring, scaling, and security that are essential for enterprise applications.
Integration with Other Technologies: LoopBack is designed to be flexible and can integrate with a wide range of technologies and databases. It provides connectors for popular databases such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB, as well as integration with other external services. StrongLoop, being the company behind LoopBack, provides additional tools and services that enhance the integration capabilities of LoopBack, making it easier to integrate with other technologies.
Licensing: LoopBack is an open-source framework released under the MIT license, which allows developers to use and modify the framework without restrictions. StrongLoop, on the other hand, provides additional tools and services that are not open-source and require a commercial license. This means that while LoopBack itself is freely available, some of the tools and services provided by StrongLoop may require a commercial license.

In Summary, LoopBack is a Node.js framework that focuses on simplicity and ease of use, while StrongLoop offers a set of tools and services for managing, scaling, and supporting LoopBack applications. StrongLoop provides enterprise-level support and offers additional features and integrations that enhance the capabilities of LoopBack.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

StrongLoop	LoopBack
It is an American company working with Node.js to create and support StrongLoop Suite, a Mobile API Tier. StrongLoop employs two members of the Node.js Technical Steering Committee. IBM & StrongLoop contribute to and support Open-Source options for the API developer community, such as LoopBack, API Microgateway, and Open API Spec.	A highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding. Connect to multiple data sources, write business logic in Node.js, glue on top of your existing services and data, connect using JS, iOS & Android SDKs.
Authentication;Geolocation support;MongoDB connector;AngularJS SDK.	A brand new core; OpenAPI spec driven REST API; GraphQL support
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 13.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.2K
Stacks 15	Stacks 285
Followers 34	Followers 556
Votes 0	Votes 33
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 11 Need a nodejs ReST-API, DB, AAA, Swagger? Then loopback 9 Easy Database Migration 6 Code generator 4 The future of API's 2 GraphQL Cons 7 Community is slow 1 Backward compatibility
Integrations
GraphQL Node.js	Node.js TypeScript ExpressJS GraphQL

What are some alternatives to StrongLoop, LoopBack?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

LoopBack vs StrongLoop: What are the differences?

Dependence on Node.js: LoopBack is built on top of Node.js, which means it relies on Node.js for its core functionality. StrongLoop, on the other hand, is the company behind LoopBack and provides additional tools and services on top of the LoopBack framework. Therefore, while LoopBack is dependent on Node.js, StrongLoop offers a more comprehensive set of tools and services.
Ease of Use: LoopBack is designed to make it easy for developers to quickly build APIs and microservices. It provides a high-level abstraction that simplifies the development process and reduces the amount of code required. StrongLoop, on the other hand, focuses on providing a set of tools and services that help developers manage and scale their LoopBack applications. This means that while LoopBack offers simplicity, StrongLoop offers more advanced features for managing and scaling applications.
Community Support: LoopBack has a large and active community of developers who contribute to its development. This means that there is a wealth of resources and knowledge available to developers using LoopBack. StrongLoop, on the other hand, provides commercial support and consulting services for LoopBack. While LoopBack has a strong community, StrongLoop offers more specialized support for developers.
Enterprise Support: LoopBack is suitable for building small to medium-sized applications, but it may not be ideal for large enterprise-level projects. StrongLoop, on the other hand, offers enterprise-level support and services that are specifically designed to meet the needs of large-scale projects. This includes features such as performance monitoring, scaling, and security that are essential for enterprise applications.
Integration with Other Technologies: LoopBack is designed to be flexible and can integrate with a wide range of technologies and databases. It provides connectors for popular databases such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB, as well as integration with other external services. StrongLoop, being the company behind LoopBack, provides additional tools and services that enhance the integration capabilities of LoopBack, making it easier to integrate with other technologies.
Licensing: LoopBack is an open-source framework released under the MIT license, which allows developers to use and modify the framework without restrictions. StrongLoop, on the other hand, provides additional tools and services that are not open-source and require a commercial license. This means that while LoopBack itself is freely available, some of the tools and services provided by StrongLoop may require a commercial license.

LoopBack vs StrongLoop

Overview