StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. LoopBack vs TypeORM

LoopBack vs TypeORM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

LoopBack
LoopBack
Stacks285
Followers556
Votes33
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks1.2K
TypeORM
TypeORM
Stacks756
Followers813
Votes81
GitHub Stars36.0K
Forks6.5K

LoopBack vs TypeORM: What are the differences?

<LoopBack is a highly extensible, open-source Node.js framework for quickly creating dynamic end-to-end REST APIs. On the other hand, TypeORM is an ORM that can run in NodeJS, Browser, Cordova, PhoneGap, Ionic, React Native, NativeScript, Expo, and Electron platforms.>

  1. Data Modeling: LoopBack provides a built-in API explorer to help developers interact with the API endpoints effortlessly, while TypeORM requires developers to define entity classes and their relationships explicitly.

  2. Database Support: LoopBack supports a variety of databases, including MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, MongoDB, and more, whereas TypeORM supports MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL, SQLite, Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle, and many others.

  3. TypeScript Integration: LoopBack has TypeScript support out of the box, making it easier for developers to write type-safe code, whereas TypeORM also supports TypeScript but requires additional configuration for full type-safety.

  4. Query Building: LoopBack provides a powerful query builder that allows developers to create complex queries easily, while TypeORM offers a simpler, more straightforward approach to building queries.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: LoopBack has a large and active community with a vast collection of extensions and plugins available, whereas TypeORM, while growing in popularity, has a smaller community size in comparison.

  6. Ease of Use: LoopBack simplifies the REST API creation process through its CLI tools and graphical UI, making it more accessible for beginners, whereas TypeORM, though powerful, may have a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and configurations.

In Summary, LoopBack and TypeORM differ in terms of data modeling, database support, TypeScript integration, query building, community size, and ease of use, providing developers with distinct choices based on their project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

LoopBack
LoopBack
TypeORM
TypeORM

A highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding. Connect to multiple data sources, write business logic in Node.js, glue on top of your existing services and data, connect using JS, iOS & Android SDKs.

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

A brand new core; OpenAPI spec driven REST API; GraphQL support
automatically create the database table schemes based on your models; transparently insert / update / delete to the database your objects; map your selections from tables to JavaScript objects and map table columns to object properties; easily create one-to-one, many-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many relations between tables; and much more.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Stars
36.0K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
6.5K
Stacks
285
Stacks
756
Followers
556
Followers
813
Votes
33
Votes
81
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Need a nodejs ReST-API, DB, AAA, Swagger? Then loopback
  • 9
    Easy Database Migration
  • 6
    Code generator
  • 4
    The future of API's
  • 2
    GraphQL
Cons
  • 7
    Community is slow
  • 1
    Backward compatibility
Pros
  • 30
    Typescript
  • 12
    Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Ser
  • 9
    Cons of TypeORM
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 7
    Works in NodeJS, Browser, Ionic, Cordova and Electron p
Cons
  • 5
    Completely abandoned by its creator
  • 3
    Too complex for what it does
  • 2
    Doesn't really support native javascript
  • 1
    Cannot use query on any relation
  • 1
    Not proper/real type safety
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
TypeScript
TypeScript
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
StrongLoop
StrongLoop
GraphQL
GraphQL
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to LoopBack, TypeORM?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase