StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Lumen vs Sails.js

Lumen vs Sails.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sails.js
Sails.js
Stacks337
Followers511
Votes296
GitHub Stars22.9K
Forks1.9K
Lumen
Lumen
Stacks429
Followers673
Votes161
GitHub Stars7.6K
Forks992

Lumen vs Sails.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Lumen and Sails.js are two popular web development frameworks. While they both have similarities in terms of being used for building web applications, there are key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore and discuss the six main differences between Lumen and Sails.js.

  1. Architecture: Lumen is a micro-framework, whereas Sails.js is a full-stack web application framework. Lumen focuses on simplicity, minimalism, and speed, making it more suitable for small-scale applications or APIs. On the other hand, Sails.js provides a robust structure for developing scalable and complex web applications.

  2. Language Support: Lumen is built on PHP, which is a popular programming language for web development. In contrast, Sails.js is built on Node.js, enabling developers to write server-side JavaScript. This difference in language support allows developers to choose a framework based on their familiarity and preference in programming languages.

  3. Database Integration: Lumen has built-in support for the Eloquent ORM, which allows developers to interact with various databases easily. Sails.js, on the other hand, comes with an ORM named Waterline, which provides a uniform API for accessing data from different databases. Both frameworks offer flexibility in terms of database integration, but they use different ORM solutions.

  4. Routing: Lumen follows a traditional routing approach, where developers define routes explicitly in their code. Sails.js, on the other hand, uses a policy-based routing system, allowing developers to define routes based on policies or access control rules. This difference provides developers with different approaches to handle routing and request handling in their applications.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Lumen has a smaller community compared to Sails.js. While Lumen is backed by the Laravel community, which is known for its extensive documentation and active community support, Sails.js has a larger and more vibrant community. Sails.js also has a rich ecosystem of plugins and modules, providing additional functionalities that developers can easily integrate into their applications.

  6. Scalability and Performance: Due to its lightweight nature, Lumen is optimized for performance and is known for its speed. It is designed for small-scale applications that require quick response times. On the other hand, Sails.js is built for scalability, with features like clustering and pub-sub architecture that allow it to handle large-scale applications with high traffic.

In summary, Lumen and Sails.js differ in their architecture, language support, database integration, routing methods, community support, and scalability/performance focus. These differences make them suitable for different types of applications and cater to the preferences and requirements of developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sails.js
Sails.js
Lumen
Lumen

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.9K
GitHub Stars
7.6K
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
992
Stacks
337
Stacks
429
Followers
511
Followers
673
Votes
296
Votes
161
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 49
    Data-driven apis
  • 47
    Waterline ORM
  • 37
    Mvc
  • 32
    Easy rest
  • 25
    Real-time
Cons
  • 5
    Waterline ORM
  • 4
    Defaults to VueJS
  • 0
    Standard MVC
Pros
  • 38
    API
  • 28
    Microframework
  • 19
    MVC
  • 16
    PHP
  • 12
    Open source
Cons
  • 3
    Not fast
  • 2
    PHP
  • 1
    Not fast with MongoDB
Integrations
Grunt
Grunt
Node.js
Node.js
MySQL
MySQL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MongoDB
MongoDB
Socket.IO
Socket.IO
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Sails.js, Lumen?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Flask

Flask

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase