StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Lumen vs Slim

Lumen vs Slim

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Slim
Slim
Stacks273
Followers391
Votes152
GitHub Stars12.2K
Forks2.0K
Lumen
Lumen
Stacks429
Followers673
Votes161
GitHub Stars7.6K
Forks992

Lumen vs Slim: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Lumen and Slim are two popular micro-frameworks in PHP that are used for building lightweight and fast web applications. While they both share similarities in terms of their purpose and philosophy, there are some key differences between them.

  1. Performance: Lumen is known for its exceptional performance and speed. It is built on the Laravel framework and inherits its performance optimizations, making it a great choice for building high-performance APIs and microservices. On the other hand, Slim also offers good performance but may not be as fast as Lumen due to its minimalistic design.

  2. Ease of Use: Lumen aims to provide a simple and easy-to-use interface for developers. It offers a wide range of built-in features and functionalities that make it easy to build APIs and microservices quickly. Slim, on the other hand, follows a minimalistic approach and focuses on providing just the basic functionalities needed to build web applications, making it more lightweight and flexible in terms of customization.

  3. Size and Resources: Lumen is a bit more resource-intensive compared to Slim. This is because Lumen comes bundled with many features and components from Laravel, which may not be needed for every project. Slim, being more lightweight, allows developers to add only the required components, resulting in a smaller footprint and better resource utilization for specific use cases where a minimalistic approach is desired.

  4. Routing: Lumen provides a powerful routing system that is similar to Laravel's routing system. It offers a simple and expressive syntax for defining routes and handling HTTP requests. Slim, on the other hand, also provides a flexible routing system but follows a more simplified approach. It allows developers to define routes using anonymous functions, making it easier to work with for smaller projects or simple APIs.

  5. Ecosystem and Community: Lumen benefits from the strong Laravel ecosystem and community support. This means developers have access to a wide range of libraries, packages, and documentation that can help streamline development and tackle complex requirements. Slim also has a supportive community, but its ecosystem may not be as extensive as Laravel's.

  6. Documentation and Learning Curve: Lumen provides comprehensive documentation and follows the Laravel documentation standards, making it easier for developers to learn and get started quickly. Slim also has decent documentation, but it may require a bit more effort to find specific information or tutorials compared to Lumen and Laravel.

In summary, Lumen excels in performance, comes with a larger feature set, and benefits from the extensive Laravel ecosystem. On the other hand, Slim focuses on minimalism, flexibility, and ease of use, making it an excellent choice for simple web applications and projects with specific resource constraints.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Slim
Slim
Lumen
Lumen

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.2K
GitHub Stars
7.6K
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
992
Stacks
273
Stacks
429
Followers
391
Followers
673
Votes
152
Votes
161
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Microframework
  • 27
    API
  • 22
    Open source
  • 21
    Php
  • 11
    Fast
Pros
  • 38
    API
  • 28
    Microframework
  • 19
    MVC
  • 16
    PHP
  • 12
    Open source
Cons
  • 3
    Not fast
  • 2
    PHP
  • 1
    Not fast with MongoDB
Integrations
PHP
PHP
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Slim, Lumen?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Flask

Flask

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase