StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Marko vs React

Marko vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Marko
Marko
Stacks29
Followers49
Votes40
GitHub Stars13.9K
Forks656

Marko vs React: What are the differences?

Markdown Cheat Sheet

Introduction

Markdown is a lightweight markup language that allows you to easily format text on the web. It is widely used for writing documentation, creating blogs, and formatting text in online platforms. In this Markdown cheat sheet, we will explore the key differences between Marko and React.

  1. Data Binding: Marko offers built-in two-way data binding, whereas React follows a one-way data flow model. With Marko, changes made to the UI are automatically reflected in the underlying data, and vice versa. In React, data flows in a unidirectional manner, which ensures better predictability and easier debugging.

  2. Component Structure: Marko organizes components as separate files, including both the JavaScript logic and the HTML template. This allows for cleaner separation of concerns and makes it easier to maintain and reuse components. In React, components are typically defined as JavaScript classes or functional components. The HTML structure is defined within the JavaScript code using JSX syntax, which can make the code more compact but also introduce complexity.

  3. Server-Side Rendering: Marko supports server-side rendering out of the box, allowing the initial HTML to be generated on the server and sent to the client. This can improve performance and enhance the user experience, especially for slower connections. React also provides server-side rendering capabilities through third-party libraries, but it requires additional setup and configuration.

  4. Performance: Marko is specifically optimized for rendering speed and minimal memory footprint, making it an excellent choice for high-performance web applications. React, on the other hand, focuses on providing a rich set of features and a flexible development experience, which can sometimes impact performance, especially for complex applications.

  5. Tooling and Ecosystem: React has a larger and more mature ecosystem compared to Marko. It has a vast collection of third-party libraries, tools, and community support. React is also widely adopted and well-documented, making it easier for developers to find solutions and resources. Marko, although relatively newer, has a growing community and is backed by the team at eBay.

  6. Learning Curve: React has a steeper learning curve compared to Marko, especially for developers who are new to the React ecosystem. Marko, with its simple and intuitive syntax, provides a gentle learning curve and is an excellent choice for developers looking for a straightforward and lightweight framework.

In Summary, Marko and React differ in their approach to data binding, component structure, server-side rendering, performance, tooling and ecosystem, and learning curve. While Marko offers built-in two-way data binding and server-side rendering, React provides a more mature ecosystem and focuses on a rich set of features, at the cost of a steeper learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Marko

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Marko
Marko

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Extremely fast; Streaming and async rendering; Progressive HTML rendering; Custom tags; Compiles to readable CommonJS modules; Server-side and client-side rendering; Use Marko with any web framework, including: Express, Koa, Hapi; Syntax highlighting in popular editors and IDEs
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
13.9K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
656
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
29
Followers
147.0K
Followers
49
Votes
4.1K
Votes
40
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 6
    Simplicity
  • 5
    Speed
  • 5
    No JSX
  • 5
    Better than React, Vue, etc
  • 4
    HTML markup
Cons
  • 1
    Mobile native
  • 1
    Extensibility
  • 1
    Unit test

What are some alternatives to React, Marko?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Preact

Preact

Preact is an attempt to recreate the core value proposition of React (or similar libraries like Mithril) using as little code as possible, with first-class support for ES2015. Currently the library is around 3kb (minified & gzipped).

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase