Masonite vs Play: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. Routing and MVC Structure: Masonite provides a convention over configuration approach with pre-defined routes and controllers, making it easier for developers to quickly set up and scaffold their projects. Play, on the other hand, allows for more flexibility in defining routes and controllers, giving developers greater control over the structure of their applications.
2. Template Engine: Masonite uses Jinja2 as its default templating engine, which offers robust features such as template inheritance and macros for building dynamic web pages. Play, on the other hand, uses Twirl templates, a Scala-based template engine that offers type safety and seamless integration with Scala code.
3. Database Integration: Masonite has built-in support for ORM through the Masonite ORM library, which simplifies database operations and offers integration with popular databases like MySQL and SQLite. Play provides database access through its built-in Slick library, which offers strong statically-typed queries and support for various database technologies.
4. Request Handling: Masonite follows a traditional request-response workflow, where each request is processed sequentially in a single thread. Play utilizes an asynchronous, non-blocking model using Akka actors, allowing for efficient handling of multiple concurrent requests and improved performance.
5. Language Support: Masonite is primarily written in Python, making it more accessible to developers familiar with the language's syntax and ecosystem. Play is built on the Scala programming language, which offers strong functional programming capabilities and seamless integration with Java libraries.
6. Package Ecosystem: Masonite has a growing but relatively smaller package ecosystem compared to Play, which benefits from the extensive libraries and frameworks available in the Java and Scala community, providing developers with more tools and resources for building complex applications.

In Summary, Masonite and Play differ in their approach to routing, structure, template engines, database integration, request handling, language support, and package ecosystem.