Material Design vs Materialize

Overview

Materialize

Stacks698

Followers1.2K

Votes557

GitHub Stars39.1K

Forks4.7K

Material Design

Stacks594

Followers890

Votes14

Material Design vs Materialize: What are the differences?

Introduction

Material Design and Materialize are both design languages created by Google that provide guidelines and components for creating visually appealing and easy-to-use interfaces.

1. Color palette: One of the key differences between Material Design and Materialize is the color palette they use. Material Design offers a wide range of vibrant and bold colors, allowing for more creativity and customization. On the other hand, Materialize has a more limited color palette, focusing on a more subdued and subtle aesthetic.

2. Typography: Another difference lies in the typography styles used in Material Design and Materialize. Material Design emphasizes using a combination of fonts for headings and body text, while Materialize primarily relies on a single font for consistency and simplicity.

3. Components and customization: Material Design provides a more comprehensive set of components and guidelines, allowing for greater flexibility and customization. Materialize, on the other hand, offers a more pre-defined and opinionated set of components, making it easier to get started but potentially limiting the level of customization.

4. Animations and transitions: Material Design places a strong emphasis on fluid animations and smooth transitions, creating a seamless user experience. Materialize also incorporates animations, but they may be less pronounced and fewer in number compared to Material Design.

5. Support and community: Material Design has a larger support and community base, as it is the official design language by Google. This means there are more resources, tutorials, and community-driven projects available for developers. Materialize has a dedicated community as well but may have a smaller scope compared to Material Design.

6. Compatibility and integration: Material Design is designed to be platform-agnostic and can be used on different devices and platforms, including web, mobile, and desktop. Materialize, on the other hand, is primarily focused on web development and may have better integration with web technologies and frameworks.

In Summary, Material Design offers a wider color palette, more component customization, and a larger support community compared to Materialize, while Materialize focuses on simplicity, a consistent typography style, and better web integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Materialize, Material Design

Ashish

Sr. UI Associate at Daffodil Software

Dec 29, 2020

Needs adviceon

Bootstrap

Material Design

Tailwind CSS

I am a bit confused when to choose Bootstrap vs Material Design or Tailwind CSS, and why? I mean, in which kind of projects we can work with bootstrap/Material/Tailwind CSS? If the design is made up on the grid, we prefer bootstrap, and if flat design, then material design. Similarly, when do we choose tailwind CSS?

Any suggestion would be appreciated?

735k views735k

Comments

Raj

Jan 3, 2021

Review

Hi Ashish,

If you need minimal work to be done from your end and like most of the components / design available out of the box - go with Bootstrap. This is the oldest and has the widest adoption and a whole range of components built out by others.

If you like Material design, this is a good choice too. Please note that Bootstrap also has a Material theme, though it is not as native.

Both of these above frameworks are bulky and has more than what you may need.

If you like to build micro-components in a elegant way, TailwindCSS is the way to go.

307k views307k

Comments

Ryan

Mar 11, 2021

Decided

Ant Design offers the most components with JS and CSS taken care of. They look clean, professional, and usable.

We paired this with Bulma for making the containers and structure reactive. Bulma (for react) make it easy to just add a section, container, and content and have it work on all platforms.

We also use Geist UI, though not recognized by Stack share, for its simple and modern feel. Highly recommend Geist if you want modern components for complicated UI's

220k views220k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Materialize	Material Design
A CSS Framework based on material design.	Material Design is a unified system that combines theory, resources, and tools for crafting digital experiences.
Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 39.1K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 4.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 698	Stacks 594
Followers 1.2K	Followers 890
Votes 557	Votes 14
Pros & Cons
Pros 102 Google material design 74 Responsive 74 Easy to use 54 Modern looks 48 Open source Cons 7 Mobile errors 6 Poor Grid System 2 Unmaintained	Pros 5 They really set a new bar in design 4 An intuitive design 3 Simply, And Beautiful 2 Many great libraries 0 Composants Cons 2 Sometimes, it can hang the browser

What are some alternatives to Materialize, Material Design?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Material Design vs Materialize: What are the differences?

Introduction

Material Design and Materialize are both design languages created by Google that provide guidelines and components for creating visually appealing and easy-to-use interfaces.

1. Color palette: One of the key differences between Material Design and Materialize is the color palette they use. Material Design offers a wide range of vibrant and bold colors, allowing for more creativity and customization. On the other hand, Materialize has a more limited color palette, focusing on a more subdued and subtle aesthetic.

2. Typography: Another difference lies in the typography styles used in Material Design and Materialize. Material Design emphasizes using a combination of fonts for headings and body text, while Materialize primarily relies on a single font for consistency and simplicity.

3. Components and customization: Material Design provides a more comprehensive set of components and guidelines, allowing for greater flexibility and customization. Materialize, on the other hand, offers a more pre-defined and opinionated set of components, making it easier to get started but potentially limiting the level of customization.

4. Animations and transitions: Material Design places a strong emphasis on fluid animations and smooth transitions, creating a seamless user experience. Materialize also incorporates animations, but they may be less pronounced and fewer in number compared to Material Design.

5. Support and community: Material Design has a larger support and community base, as it is the official design language by Google. This means there are more resources, tutorials, and community-driven projects available for developers. Materialize has a dedicated community as well but may have a smaller scope compared to Material Design.

6. Compatibility and integration: Material Design is designed to be platform-agnostic and can be used on different devices and platforms, including web, mobile, and desktop. Materialize, on the other hand, is primarily focused on web development and may have better integration with web technologies and frameworks.

In Summary, Material Design offers a wider color palette, more component customization, and a larger support community compared to Materialize, while Materialize focuses on simplicity, a consistent typography style, and better web integration.

Material Design vs Materialize

Overview

Material Design vs Materialize: What are the differences?

Introduction

2. Typography: Another difference lies in the typography styles used in Material Design and Materialize. Material Design emphasizes using a combination of fonts for headings and body text, while Materialize primarily relies on a single font for consistency and simplicity.

4. Animations and transitions: Material Design places a strong emphasis on fluid animations and smooth transitions, creating a seamless user experience. Materialize also incorporates animations, but they may be less pronounced and fewer in number compared to Material Design.