Clarity Design System vs Material Design

Overview

Material Design

Stacks594

Followers890

Votes14

Clarity Design System

Stacks26

Followers95

Votes25

Clarity Design System vs Material Design: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will be comparing the key differences between Clarity Design System and Material Design.

Visual Style: The visual style of Clarity Design System is more focused on simplicity and minimalism, with clean lines and a modern look. On the other hand, Material Design offers a more vibrant and colorful visual style, with a focus on depth and realistic 3D effects.
Components: Clarity Design System provides a comprehensive set of UI components that are specifically designed for enterprise applications. These components offer a consistent and functional design for complex data-driven interfaces. Material Design, on the other hand, focuses on providing a wide range of general-purpose UI components that can be used in various types of applications.
Typography: Clarity Design System emphasizes a simple and clean typography, with a focus on legibility and readability. It uses a limited set of font weights and sizes to maintain consistency throughout the design. Material Design, on the other hand, offers a more diverse range of typography options, allowing designers to choose from a wide range of font weights, sizes, and styles.
Interaction Patterns: Clarity Design System provides interaction patterns that are specifically designed for enterprise applications, such as data grids, forms, and filters. These patterns are focused on providing efficient and effective ways of interacting with complex data. Material Design, on the other hand, offers a more general set of interaction patterns that can be used in various types of applications, including mobile, web, and desktop.
Accessibility: Clarity Design System places a strong emphasis on accessibility, with built-in support for keyboard navigation, screen readers, and other assistive technologies. It provides guidelines and best practices for designing accessible UI components. Material Design also considers accessibility as an important factor, but it may require additional customization and implementation to achieve a high level of accessibility.
Ecosystem and Community: Clarity Design System is developed and maintained by VMware, with a dedicated team of designers and developers. It has a smaller community compared to Material Design, but it offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources. Material Design, on the other hand, is developed and maintained by Google, with a large and active community. It has a vast ecosystem of third-party libraries, frameworks, and tools, making it easier to integrate Material Design into different platforms and technologies.

In Summary, Clarity Design System and Material Design differ in their visual style, provided components, typography, interaction patterns, accessibility focus, and ecosystem/community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design	Clarity Design System
Material Design is a unified system that combines theory, resources, and tools for crafting digital experiences.	UX guidelines, HTML/CSS framework, and Angular components working together to craft exceptional experiences. Start building with our HTML/CSS framework and rapidly go from prototype to production.
-	Product-based;Rapid development;Reliable;Rapidly go from prototype to production; A set of data-bound and performant components on top of Angular to add interactivity
Statistics
Stacks 594	Stacks 26
Followers 890	Followers 95
Votes 14	Votes 25
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 They really set a new bar in design 4 An intuitive design 3 Simply, And Beautiful 2 Many great libraries 0 Composants Cons 2 Sometimes, it can hang the browser	Pros 4 Angular 3 CSS framework 3 Free 3 Open source 2 Backed bby vmWare
Integrations
No integrations available	Angular CLI Angular AngularJS CSS 3 HTML5

What are some alternatives to Material Design, Clarity Design System?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Clarity Design System vs Material Design: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will be comparing the key differences between Clarity Design System and Material Design.

Visual Style: The visual style of Clarity Design System is more focused on simplicity and minimalism, with clean lines and a modern look. On the other hand, Material Design offers a more vibrant and colorful visual style, with a focus on depth and realistic 3D effects.
Components: Clarity Design System provides a comprehensive set of UI components that are specifically designed for enterprise applications. These components offer a consistent and functional design for complex data-driven interfaces. Material Design, on the other hand, focuses on providing a wide range of general-purpose UI components that can be used in various types of applications.
Typography: Clarity Design System emphasizes a simple and clean typography, with a focus on legibility and readability. It uses a limited set of font weights and sizes to maintain consistency throughout the design. Material Design, on the other hand, offers a more diverse range of typography options, allowing designers to choose from a wide range of font weights, sizes, and styles.
Interaction Patterns: Clarity Design System provides interaction patterns that are specifically designed for enterprise applications, such as data grids, forms, and filters. These patterns are focused on providing efficient and effective ways of interacting with complex data. Material Design, on the other hand, offers a more general set of interaction patterns that can be used in various types of applications, including mobile, web, and desktop.
Accessibility: Clarity Design System places a strong emphasis on accessibility, with built-in support for keyboard navigation, screen readers, and other assistive technologies. It provides guidelines and best practices for designing accessible UI components. Material Design also considers accessibility as an important factor, but it may require additional customization and implementation to achieve a high level of accessibility.
Ecosystem and Community: Clarity Design System is developed and maintained by VMware, with a dedicated team of designers and developers. It has a smaller community compared to Material Design, but it offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources. Material Design, on the other hand, is developed and maintained by Google, with a large and active community. It has a vast ecosystem of third-party libraries, frameworks, and tools, making it easier to integrate Material Design into different platforms and technologies.

In Summary, Clarity Design System and Material Design differ in their visual style, provided components, typography, interaction patterns, accessibility focus, and ecosystem/community support.