StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Materialize vs tachyons

Materialize vs tachyons

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Materialize
Materialize
Stacks698
Followers1.2K
Votes557
GitHub Stars39.1K
Forks4.7K
tachyons
tachyons
Stacks70
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars11.7K
Forks675

Materialize vs tachyons: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between Materialize and tachyons are outlined below:

1. **Design Philosophy**: Materialize follows the Material Design principles by Google which focuses on utilizing light, depth, and motion to create intuitive user experiences. On the other hand, Tachyons is known for its functional utility-first approach, prioritizing fast loading times with minimal CSS code for easier customization. 

2. **Customization**: Materialize provides a more structured and opinionated approach to styling elements with predefined components and themes, making it easier for beginners to achieve a consistent design. In contrast, Tachyons offers a more low-level and granular control over styles, allowing developers to quickly prototype and customize designs without relying on predefined components.

3. **File Size**: Materialize includes a more extensive collection of CSS components and JavaScript functionalities, resulting in a larger file size when compared to Tachyons. Tachyons, known for its small footprint, focuses on atomic CSS classes which can be combined to create complex layouts efficiently, resulting in faster loading times and smaller file sizes.

4. **Learning Curve**: Materialize provides extensive documentation, examples, and predefined components making it easier for beginners to get started and achieve polished designs without much CSS knowledge. Tachyons, on the other hand, requires a deeper understanding of CSS principles due to its atomic class structure, making it more suitable for developers who prefer a more hands-on approach to styling.

5. **Community Support**: Materialize has a larger community and ecosystem with more resources, plugins, and templates available for developers. Tachyons, while having a smaller community, has a dedicated following of developers who appreciate its lightweight and efficient approach to styling websites.

6. **Flexibility**: Materialize, with its predefined components and themes, offers less flexibility in terms of customization compared to Tachyons, which allows for more creative and unique designs through its atomic class-based system without being constrained by predefined styles.

In Summary, Materialize and Tachyons differ in design philosophy, customization options, file size, learning curve, community support, and flexibility, catering to different preferences and needs in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Materialize
Materialize
tachyons
tachyons

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Create fast loading, highly readable, and 100% responsive interfaces with as little CSS as possible.

Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
Mobile-first css architecture; 490 accessible color combinations; 8px baseline grid;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
39.1K
GitHub Stars
11.7K
GitHub Forks
4.7K
GitHub Forks
675
Stacks
698
Stacks
70
Followers
1.2K
Followers
79
Votes
557
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 102
    Google material design
  • 74
    Responsive
  • 74
    Easy to use
  • 54
    Modern looks
  • 48
    Open source
Cons
  • 7
    Mobile errors
  • 6
    Poor Grid System
  • 2
    Unmaintained
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
PostCSS
PostCSS
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Materialize, tachyons?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase