StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Microbundle vs Parcel

Microbundle vs Parcel

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Parcel
Parcel
Stacks874
Followers250
Votes18
GitHub Stars44.0K
Forks2.3K
Microbundle
Microbundle
Stacks30
Followers36
Votes2
GitHub Stars8.1K
Forks361

Microbundle vs Parcel: What are the differences?

  1. Setup and Configuration: Microbundle requires minimal setup and configuration to start bundling a project, making it ideal for small to medium-sized projects. On the other hand, Parcel offers more customization options and configurations, allowing developers to tailor the bundling process to specific project requirements.

  2. Tree Shaking: Microbundle has built-in tree shaking capabilities, which help reduce the size of the final bundle by removing unused code. In contrast, Parcel also supports tree shaking but may require additional configuration settings to optimize this feature effectively.

  3. Bundle Size Optimization: Microbundle focuses on producing lightweight bundles by default, resulting in smaller file sizes and faster load times. Parcel, while efficient, may create larger bundles due to its more extensive feature set and configuration options, sometimes requiring manual optimization by developers.

  4. Performance: Microbundle is known for its fast build times, making it a preferred choice for quick prototyping and development iterations. Parcel, while also performant, may take longer to build larger projects due to its advanced features and optimizations.

  5. Hot Module Replacement (HMR): Microbundle offers built-in support for HMR, allowing developers to see changes in real-time without needing to reload the entire application. Parcel also supports HMR but may require additional setup and configurations to enable this feature.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Microbundle has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Parcel, which has a more extensive support network, plugins, and integrations. Developers considering factors such as community support and third-party tools may prefer Parcel for its robust ecosystem.

In Summary, Microbundle is ideal for quick setup, small bundles, and fast builds, while Parcel offers more extensive customization, community support, and features for larger projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Parcel
Parcel
Microbundle
Microbundle

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

Blazing fast bundle times; Bundle all your assets; Automatic transforms; Zero config code splitting; Hot module replacement; Friendly error logging
Bundles your library using nothing but a package.json; Support for ESnext & async/await; Supports multiple entry modules; Creates multiple output formats for each entry; Build-in Uglify compression & gzipped bundle size tracking
Statistics
GitHub Stars
44.0K
GitHub Stars
8.1K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
361
Stacks
874
Stacks
30
Followers
250
Followers
36
Votes
18
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Zero configuration
  • 8
    Built-in dev server with livereload
Cons
  • 3
    Lack of documentation
Pros
  • 1
    Works well with TypeScript
  • 1
    All the best Terser and Rollup settings already set
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
npm
npm

What are some alternatives to Parcel, Microbundle?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Webpack

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

System.js

System.js

It is a Universal Module Loader for JavaScript. If you've used RequireJs or a CommonJs bundler in the past, you have probably created modules.Configurable module loader enabling dynamic ES module workflows in browsers and NodeJS.

Esbuild

Esbuild

It is an extremely fast JavaScript and CSS bundler and minifier. Current build tools for the web are 10-100x slower than they could be. The main goal of this project is to bring about a new era of build tool performance, and create an easy-to-use modern bundler along the way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana