StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Group Chat And Notifications
  5. Microsoft Teams vs Spectrum

Microsoft Teams vs Spectrum

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Stacks2.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes144
Spectrum
Spectrum
Stacks23
Followers32
Votes0
GitHub Stars10.9K
Forks1.2K

Microsoft Teams vs Spectrum: What are the differences?

Introduction: Microsoft Teams and Spectrum are both popular communication and collaboration tools used in various corporate settings. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two that set them apart from each other.

  1. Integration with other apps: One major difference between Microsoft Teams and Spectrum is the level of integration they offer with other apps and services. Microsoft Teams is tightly integrated with the Microsoft Office 365 suite, allowing users to seamlessly collaborate on documents, spreadsheets, and presentations. On the other hand, Spectrum offers integration with a wide range of third-party apps, making it more versatile in terms of connecting different tools and workflows.

  2. Video conferencing capabilities: Microsoft Teams is known for its robust video conferencing capabilities. It offers features like video meetings, screen sharing, and live captioning, making it a popular choice for virtual meetings and remote collaboration. Spectrum, on the other hand, focuses more on asynchronous communication and does not have built-in video conferencing features. It provides a platform for organized discussions and threaded conversations, making it suitable for teams that primarily communicate through text-based interactions.

  3. Team management and organization: Another key difference between Microsoft Teams and Spectrum is the way they handle team management and organization. Microsoft Teams allows users to create multiple teams and channels, enabling a hierarchical structure for organizing conversations, files, and tasks. Spectrum, on the other hand, uses a flat structure where all discussions are organized in one place. While this can make it easier to find and participate in conversations, it may pose challenges for larger teams with diverse topics.

  4. File sharing and collaboration: Both Microsoft Teams and Spectrum offer file sharing and collaboration features, but they differ in their approach. Microsoft Teams provides integration with OneDrive and SharePoint, allowing users to store, share, and collaborate on files within the Microsoft ecosystem. Spectrum, on the other hand, offers a simple file upload feature that focuses more on discussions around the files rather than extensive collaboration capabilities.

  5. Customization and extensibility: Microsoft Teams provides a range of customization options, allowing users to personalize their experience with custom backgrounds, themes, and app integrations. It also offers a variety of third-party apps and connectors that can enhance the functionality of the platform. Spectrum, on the other hand, has a more minimalistic approach and does not provide as much customization or extensibility options.

  6. Pricing and availability: Microsoft Teams is part of the Microsoft Office 365 suite and is available as part of various subscription plans, ranging from free to enterprise-level licenses. Spectrum, on the other hand, is a standalone product with a different pricing structure. It offers both free and paid plans, with additional features and support available for premium subscribers. The availability of Microsoft Teams is global, while Spectrum is limited to a few specific regions.

In summary, Microsoft Teams offers deeper integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, robust video conferencing capabilities, hierarchical team management, extensive file collaboration features, customization options, and a wide availability. On the other hand, Spectrum provides integration with third-party apps, focuses on asynchronous communication, uses a flat structure for team organization, provides a simpler file sharing experience, limited customization options, and is available in specific regions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Microsoft Teams, Spectrum

Mohammad Hossein
Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planallay Sdn Bhd

Jan 17, 2020

Decided

we were using slack and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.

on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.

we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.

266k views266k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Spectrum
Spectrum

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

The community platform for the future.

All your content, tools, people, and conversations are available in the team workspace;Enjoy built-in access to SharePoint, OneNote, and Skype for Business;Work on documents right in the app
Chat; Slack bot; Private channels; Home feed; Search
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
10.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
2.4K
Stacks
23
Followers
1.7K
Followers
32
Votes
144
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 29
    Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow
  • 24
    Mobile friendly
  • 19
    Free
  • 12
    Great integrations
  • 12
    Well-thought Design
Cons
  • 17
    Confusing UI
  • 12
    Bad performance on init and after quite a use
  • 10
    Bad Usermanagement
  • 6
    No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)
  • 6
    Can't see all members in a video meeting
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Skype
Skype
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Microsoft Teams, Spectrum?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Telegram

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack