StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Mockito vs pytest

Mockito vs pytest

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mockito
Mockito
Stacks3.6K
Followers180
Votes0
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.6K
pytest
pytest
Stacks4.0K
Followers306
Votes0
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks2.9K

Mockito vs pytest: What are the differences?

Mockito and pytest are two popular testing frameworks used in software development. While both frameworks serve the purpose of testing, they have key differences that set them apart.
  1. Syntax and Language: Mockito is a mocking framework for Java, while pytest is a testing framework for Python. Consequently, Mockito uses Java syntax and relies on Java-specific features, while pytest uses Python syntax and leverages Python-specific functionalities.

  2. Integration with JUnit/Jupiter: Mockito integrates seamlessly with JUnit and JUnit 5 (Jupiter), which are popular unit testing frameworks for Java. On the other hand, pytest does not have a built-in integration with a specific testing framework. However, it can be used with other Python testing frameworks like unittest or doctest.

  3. Fixture Management: In pytest, fixture management is a prominent feature. Fixtures in pytest are functions that provide and manage test resources and dependencies. On the contrary, Mockito does not have a built-in mechanism for managing fixtures, as it mainly focuses on mocking and stubbing objects.

  4. Test Doubles and Mocking: Mockito focuses on the creation of test doubles, such as mock objects, stubs, and spies. It provides capabilities for flexible mocking, method verification, and behavior verification. In comparison, pytest supports mocking through libraries like unittest.mock, but it does not have in-built capabilities specifically tailored for test doubles.

  5. Test Organization and Discovery: Pytest offers powerful test discovery mechanisms and provides various ways to organize tests, including test modules, test classes, and test functions. It allows test collection based on naming conventions and flexible test selection options. In contrast, Mockito does not have built-in test discovery capabilities and relies on external test runners like JUnit to organize and execute tests.

  6. Community Support and Ecosystem: Both Mockito and pytest have active communities and extensive ecosystems of plugins, extensions, and integrations. However, Mockito's community and ecosystem primarily revolve around Java and the JVM, while pytest's community and ecosystem are centered around Python and its associated technologies.

In summary, Mockito is a Java-specific mocking framework tightly integrated with JUnit, focusing on providing test doubles and advanced mocking capabilities. On the other hand, pytest is a Python testing framework that embraces Python's syntax and offers a versatile testing experience with powerful test discovery, fixture management, and flexible test organization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mockito
Mockito
pytest
pytest

It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn’t give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors.

A framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testing for applications and libraries. It is a mature full-featured Python testing tool.

-
Auto-discovery; Modular fixtures
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Forks
2.6K
GitHub Forks
2.9K
Stacks
3.6K
Stacks
4.0K
Followers
180
Followers
306
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
PyCharm
PyCharm

What are some alternatives to Mockito, pytest?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana