StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Mockito vs Spock Framework

Mockito vs Spock Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mockito
Mockito
Stacks3.6K
Followers180
Votes0
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.6K
Spock Framework
Spock Framework
Stacks694
Followers84
Votes23
GitHub Stars3.6K
Forks475

Mockito vs Spock Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

Mockito and Spock Framework are both popular testing frameworks used in software development. While both frameworks aim to simplify the testing process, they have key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore and compare these differences.

  1. Syntax: Mockito uses a more traditional syntax based on method calls, where tests are written using chained method calls such as when(mockedObject.method()).thenReturn(value). On the other hand, Spock Framework utilizes a more expressive and readable syntax with its Given-When-Then blocks, making it easier to understand and maintain the test code.

  2. Data Driven Testing: Spock Framework provides built-in support for data-driven testing, allowing developers to define test cases using tabular data. With Spock, you can easily parameterize your tests and execute them with different inputs and expected outputs. Mockito, however, does not have built-in support for data-driven testing, requiring developers to manually implement such functionality.

  3. Mocking: Mockito focuses on mock-based testing, where you create mock objects to simulate dependencies or external components. It provides a rich API for creating mocks and stubbing their behavior. Spock, on the other hand, goes beyond mocking and provides a complete testing framework that combines mocking, stubbing, and verification capabilities in a concise manner.

  4. Integration: Mockito is widely used with Java-based projects and integrates seamlessly with popular testing frameworks like JUnit. It can be easily integrated into existing projects without any major changes to the testing infrastructure. Spock, on the other hand, is primarily aimed at Groovy-based projects and integrates well with the Groovy ecosystem. While it is possible to use Spock with Java projects, it may require additional setup and configuration.

  5. Test Execution Order: In Mockito, the order of test method execution is not guaranteed. Each test method is executed independently and in no particular order. On the contrary, Spock executes test methods in the order they are defined in the specification file. This can be useful when the order of test execution matters, especially in scenarios where some tests depend on the results of previous tests.

  6. Verification: Mockito provides a flexible and powerful mechanism for verifying interactions with mock objects. It allows you to verify if certain methods were called, how many times they were called, and with what arguments. Spock, on the other hand, uses a more declarative approach to verification. It offers built-in verification blocks that automatically verify the interactions of mocked objects, reducing the amount of boilerplate code required for verification.

In summary, Mockito and Spock Framework differ in their syntax, support for data-driven testing, approach to mocking and verification, integration capabilities, test execution order, and syntax readability. Both frameworks have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mockito
Mockito
Spock Framework
Spock Framework

It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn’t give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors.

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
3.6K
GitHub Forks
2.6K
GitHub Forks
475
Stacks
3.6K
Stacks
694
Followers
180
Followers
84
Votes
0
Votes
23
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 7
    Ease of use via the Given/When/Then approach
  • 5
    Verbose output for test failures
  • 5
    Built-in mocking library
  • 5
    Easily write one test with multiple cases
  • 1
    Parametrisation

What are some alternatives to Mockito, Spock Framework?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana