StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Mockito vs unittest

Mockito vs unittest

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mockito
Mockito
Stacks3.6K
Followers180
Votes0
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.6K
unittest
unittest
Stacks213
Followers58
Votes0

Mockito vs unittest : What are the differences?

Introduction

In this document, we will explore the key differences between Mockito and unittest. Mockito is a mocking framework for Java, while unittest is a testing framework for Python. Despite both being used for testing purposes, they have some distinct differences in their features and usage. Let's dive into the details.

  1. Functionality: Mockito and unittest differ in terms of their functionality. Mockito is primarily used for creating mock objects and stubbing methods in Java tests. It allows for verifying the interactions between objects and can be used for testing the behavior of a method. On the other hand, unittest in Python is a comprehensive testing framework that supports test automation, test discovery, and fixture management.

  2. Syntax: The syntax of Mockito and unittest varies due to the differences in programming languages. Mockito makes use of Java syntax, including method chaining and the use of static methods from the Mockito class. Unittest, being a Python framework, follows the syntax of the Python language, which is known for its simplicity and readability.

  3. Integration: Mockito is widely used in combination with JUnit, a popular unit testing framework for Java. It provides an extension to JUnit that enables simplified mocking and verification. Unittest, on the other hand, has built-in support for mocking and does not require additional libraries or frameworks for its integration.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Mockito and unittest are supported by different communities and have their own ecosystems. Mockito has a well-established community and is widely used in the Java ecosystem, with numerous resources and plugins available. Unittest is the default testing framework in Python and is supported by the Python community, which offers a vast range of testing-related modules and tools.

  5. Test Runner: Mockito and unittest differ in their test runners. Mockito tests are typically run using the JUnit test runner, which provides features for test execution and reporting. Unittest, being a testing framework itself, includes its own test runner that can run test cases and generate test reports.

  6. Test Fixtures: Mockito and unittest have different approaches to test fixtures. In Mockito, fixtures are typically created using the @Before and @After annotations provided by JUnit. These annotations allow for the setup and teardown of test resources. Unittest uses setUp() and tearDown() methods that are automatically called before and after each test method execution, providing a convenient way to handle test fixtures.

In summary, Mockito is a mocking framework primarily used for creating mock objects in Java tests, while unittest is a comprehensive testing framework for Python. They differ in terms of functionality, syntax, integration, community, test runners, and test fixture handling.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mockito
Mockito
unittest
unittest

It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn’t give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors.

It is python’s xUnit style framework. It works much the same as the other styles of xUnit, and if you’re familiar with unit testing in other languages, this framework (or derived versions), may be the most comfortable for you.

-
Python’s xUnit style framework; Supports test automation; Aggregation of tests into collections;Independence of the tests from the reporting framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.6K
Stacks
213
Followers
180
Followers
58
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Django
Django
Python
Python
Flask
Flask
pytest
pytest

What are some alternatives to Mockito, unittest ?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana