StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Spock Framework vs mockk

Spock Framework vs mockk

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spock Framework
Spock Framework
Stacks694
Followers84
Votes23
GitHub Stars3.6K
Forks475
mockk
mockk
Stacks40
Followers23
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.7K
Forks387

Spock Framework vs mockk: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between the Spock Framework and MockK, two popular testing frameworks in the world of Java and Kotlin.

  1. 1. Test Syntax: The syntax used in Spock Framework is based on the Groovy programming language, which allows for a more concise and expressive test code. On the other hand, MockK is a Kotlin-based testing framework that leverages Kotlin's language features, making the test code more readable and expressive for Kotlin developers.

  2. 2. Integration: Spock Framework has seamless integration with popular testing frameworks like JUnit and TestNG, allowing developers to leverage the extensive ecosystem and tools available in these frameworks. In comparison, MockK provides direct compatibility with Kotlin and can be used seamlessly with Kotlin test frameworks like KotlinTest.

  3. 3. Mocking and Stubbing: Spock Framework provides a versatile mocking and stubbing capability, allowing developers to easily create mock objects and specify their behavior using a BDD-style syntax. MockK, on the other hand, offers a similar mocking and stubbing capability, but with a more Kotlin-focused syntax that leverages the power of Kotlin's language features like default arguments and extension functions.

  4. 4. Mocking Frameworks Support: Spock Framework integrates well with multiple popular mocking frameworks like Mockito and EasyMock, making it easier for developers to switch between different mocking frameworks based on their project requirements. In contrast, MockK is a standalone mocking framework that provides all the necessary mocking and stubbing capabilities without the need for additional mockito or other mocking frameworks.

  5. 5. Test Execution: Spock Framework follows a specification-based approach where tests are written as specifications using given-when-then blocks. This approach provides better readability and maintainability for tests. On the other hand, MockK follows a more traditional unit testing approach, where tests are written as individual test methods. This approach may be more suitable for developers who prefer a traditional unit testing style.

  6. 6. Test Doubles: Spock Framework provides built-in support for various types of test doubles like spies, fakes, and stubs, allowing developers to easily create and use these test doubles in their tests. MockK, on the other hand, focuses primarily on mocking and stubbing capabilities, providing a more streamlined approach for creating and using mock objects.

In summary, the Spock Framework is based on Groovy and provides a concise and expressive syntax for test code, seamless integration with popular testing frameworks, and a versatile mocking and stubbing capability. On the other hand, MockK is a Kotlin-based testing framework that leverages Kotlin's language features, offers a more Kotlin-focused syntax, and provides a standalone mocking and stubbing capability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Spock Framework
Spock Framework
mockk
mockk

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

It is an open-source library focused on making mocking in Kotlin great. It is a library with the possibility of mocking default arguments, final classes, varargs, coroutines and extension methods.

-
Object mocks; Static mocks; Constructor mocks; Partial argument matching; Mocking default arguments; Mocking final classes; Mocking varargs; Hierarchical mocking
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.6K
GitHub Stars
5.7K
GitHub Forks
475
GitHub Forks
387
Stacks
694
Stacks
40
Followers
84
Followers
23
Votes
23
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Ease of use via the Given/When/Then approach
  • 5
    Verbose output for test failures
  • 5
    Built-in mocking library
  • 5
    Easily write one test with multiple cases
  • 1
    Parametrisation
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Kotlin
Kotlin

What are some alternatives to Spock Framework, mockk?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana