Mozilla Brick vs Skeleton

Overview

Skeleton

Stacks54

Followers100

Votes24

GitHub Stars19.7K

Forks3.1K

Mozilla Brick

Stacks3

Followers12

Votes1

GitHub Stars3.0K

Forks201

Mozilla Brick vs Skeleton: What are the differences?

Developers describe Mozilla Brick as "UI Components for Modern Web Apps". Brick is a collection of UI components designed for the easy and quick building of web application UIs. Brick components are built using the Web Components standard to allow developers to describe the UI of their app using the HTML syntax they already know. On the other hand, Skeleton is detailed as "A Beautiful Boilerplate for Responsive, Mobile-Friendly Development". Skeleton is a small collection of CSS files that can help you rapidly develop sites that look beautiful at any size, be it a 17" laptop screen or an iPhone.

Mozilla Brick and Skeleton belong to "Front-End Frameworks" category of the tech stack.

Mozilla Brick and Skeleton are both open source tools. It seems that Skeleton with 16.8K GitHub stars and 2.93K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Mozilla Brick with 3.05K GitHub stars and 229 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Skeleton	Mozilla Brick
Skeleton is a small collection of CSS files that can help you rapidly develop sites that look beautiful at any size, be it a 17" laptop screen or an iPhone.	Brick is a collection of UI components designed for the easy and quick building of web application UIs. Brick components are built using the Web Components standard to allow developers to describe the UI of their app using the HTML syntax they already know.
Responsive Grid Down To Mobile;Fast to Start;Style Agnostic;	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 19.7K	GitHub Stars 3.0K
GitHub Forks 3.1K	GitHub Forks 201
Stacks 54	Stacks 3
Followers 100	Followers 12
Votes 24	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 9 Minimalist 6 Responsive 4 Simple 2 Fantastically straight forward 1 Lightweight, clean syntax Cons 0 Have to make design decisions	Pros 1 Inovative

What are some alternatives to Skeleton, Mozilla Brick?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Mozilla Brick vs Skeleton