Munin vs StatsD

Overview

StatsD

Stacks373

Followers293

Votes31

Munin

Stacks71

Followers95

Votes10

GitHub Stars2.1K

Forks479

Munin vs StatsD: What are the differences?

Key differences between Munin and StatsD

Data Collection Method: Munin collects data through its agents running on each node which periodically fetch data and send it to the central server for storage and visualization. On the other hand, StatsD uses UDP to collect and aggregate metrics, providing a lighter-weight and more scalable approach to data collection.
Visualization and Storage: Munin offers a built-in web interface for visualization and stores historical data in RRD files. In contrast, StatsD focuses on collecting and aggregating data, leaving the visualization and storage to other tools such as Graphite or InfluxDB.
Metric Types: Munin primarily supports system-level metrics related to resource usage, such as CPU, memory, and network statistics. StatsD, however, is more flexible and allows for the monitoring of custom application-specific metrics, making it suitable for a wider range of use cases.
Alerting: Munin lacks built-in support for alerting, requiring additional plugins or third-party tools for setting up notifications based on predefined thresholds. In contrast, StatsD is designed to work in conjunction with monitoring and alerting platforms like Prometheus or Grafana, providing more robust alerting capabilities out of the box.
Community and Ecosystem: Munin has been around for a longer time and has a more established community with a wide range of plugins and extensions available. StatsD, being a more lightweight and focused tool, may have a smaller community but benefits from integrations with popular monitoring platforms and tools, offering more versatility in terms of ecosystem support.
Scalability: Munin can struggle with scaling to a large number of nodes due to the architecture of having agents on each node reporting back to a central server. StatsD, utilizing UDP for data collection and aggregation, can handle a higher volume of metrics and nodes more efficiently, making it a better choice for environments with high scalability requirements.

In Summary, Munin and StatsD differ in data collection method, visualization, metric types, alerting capabilities, community support, and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

StatsD	Munin
It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).	Munin is a networked resource monitoring tool that can help analyze resource trends and "what just happened to kill our performance?" problems. It is designed to be very plug and play. A default installation provides a lot of graphs with almost no work.
Network daemon; Runs on the Node.js platform; Sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 2.1K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 479
Stacks 373	Stacks 71
Followers 293	Followers 95
Votes 31	Votes 10
Pros & Cons
Pros 9 Open source 7 Single responsibility 5 Efficient wire format 3 Handles aggregation 3 Loads of integrations Cons 1 No authentication; cannot be used over Internet	Pros 3 Good defaults 2 Adheres to traditional Linux standards 2 Alerts can trigger any command line program 2 Extremely fast to install 1 Easy to write custom plugins
Integrations
Node.js Docker Graphite	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to StatsD, Munin?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

Munin vs StatsD: What are the differences?

Key differences between Munin and StatsD

Data Collection Method: Munin collects data through its agents running on each node which periodically fetch data and send it to the central server for storage and visualization. On the other hand, StatsD uses UDP to collect and aggregate metrics, providing a lighter-weight and more scalable approach to data collection.
Visualization and Storage: Munin offers a built-in web interface for visualization and stores historical data in RRD files. In contrast, StatsD focuses on collecting and aggregating data, leaving the visualization and storage to other tools such as Graphite or InfluxDB.
Metric Types: Munin primarily supports system-level metrics related to resource usage, such as CPU, memory, and network statistics. StatsD, however, is more flexible and allows for the monitoring of custom application-specific metrics, making it suitable for a wider range of use cases.
Alerting: Munin lacks built-in support for alerting, requiring additional plugins or third-party tools for setting up notifications based on predefined thresholds. In contrast, StatsD is designed to work in conjunction with monitoring and alerting platforms like Prometheus or Grafana, providing more robust alerting capabilities out of the box.
Community and Ecosystem: Munin has been around for a longer time and has a more established community with a wide range of plugins and extensions available. StatsD, being a more lightweight and focused tool, may have a smaller community but benefits from integrations with popular monitoring platforms and tools, offering more versatility in terms of ecosystem support.
Scalability: Munin can struggle with scaling to a large number of nodes due to the architecture of having agents on each node reporting back to a central server. StatsD, utilizing UDP for data collection and aggregation, can handle a higher volume of metrics and nodes more efficiently, making it a better choice for environments with high scalability requirements.

In Summary, Munin and StatsD differ in data collection method, visualization, metric types, alerting capabilities, community support, and scalability.

Munin vs StatsD

Overview