Nameko vs Starlette: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Nameko and Starlette:

1. **Architecture**: Nameko is a microservices framework that provides a high-level service-oriented architecture, making it easier to create and manage microservices. On the other hand, Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework designed for building high-performance asyncio services.
   
2. **Features**: Nameko offers built-in support for RPC, event dispatching, dependency injection, and more, whereas Starlette focuses on providing a simple and extensible framework for building web applications and APIs.
   
3. **Community**: Nameko has a smaller community compared to Starlette, which has gained popularity due to its simplicity and performance-oriented design. This can affect the availability of documentation, community support, and third-party integrations.
   
4. **Use Cases**: Nameko is suitable for complex microservices architectures and distributed systems due to its focus on service-oriented design, while Starlette is better suited for building lightweight web applications and APIs that require high performance and scalability.
   
5. **Ease of Use**: Nameko can have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its emphasis on microservices concepts and architecture, whereas Starlette's minimalist design and simple API make it easier to get started with building web services.
   
6. **Extensibility**: Nameko provides a more structured approach to building microservices, making it easier to scale and integrate new services, whereas Starlette's modular design allows for flexibility and extensibility in customizing the framework to suit specific project requirements.

# Summary

In Summary, Nameko is geared towards complex microservices architectures while Starlette is focused on high-performance asyncio services and web applications, offering different levels of abstraction and features to cater to specific project needs.