StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Nchan vs ws

Nchan vs ws

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Nchan
Nchan
Stacks126
Followers19
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.1K
Forks294
ws
ws
Stacks1.2K
Followers190
Votes0
GitHub Stars22.5K
Forks2.5K

Nchan vs ws: What are the differences?

  1. Protocol Support: Nchan supports various protocols such as WebSocket, HTTP/2 Server Push, SPDY, and long-polling, whereas ws specifically focuses on WebSocket protocol only.

  2. Functionality: Nchan is a more comprehensive message queuing system that includes features like message buffering, message replay, message distribution, and message expiration, while ws is primarily used for real-time bidirectional communication.

  3. Scalability: Nchan is designed to handle a large number of concurrent connections and messages, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications, whereas ws may struggle with scalability in such environments.

  4. Customization: Nchan offers various configuration options and settings for fine-tuning the behavior of the message queuing system, while ws provides a more simplistic and straightforward WebSocket implementation without extensive customization options.

  5. Compatibility: Nchan is compatible with a wider range of web servers such as Nginx and Apache, allowing for easy integration into existing server setups, whereas ws is generally used as a standalone WebSocket server.

  6. Documentation: Nchan provides detailed documentation, examples, and use cases for implementing and utilizing the message queuing system effectively, whereas ws may have limited documentation and community support available.

In Summary, Nchan and ws differ in terms of protocol support, functionality, scalability, customization, compatibility, and documentation, making them suitable for different use cases in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Nchan
Nchan
ws
ws

It is built as a module for the Nginx web server. It can be configured as a standalone server, or as a shim between your application and hundreds, thousands, or millions of live subscribers. It can buffer messages in memory, on-disk, or via Redis.

It is a simple to use, blazing fast, and thoroughly tested WebSocket client and server implementation.

flexible pub/sub server; Horizontally scalable (using Redis); Subscribe to hundreds of channels over a single subscriber connection.
Simple to use;Blazing fast;WebSocket client and server for Node.js
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.1K
GitHub Stars
22.5K
GitHub Forks
294
GitHub Forks
2.5K
Stacks
126
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
19
Followers
190
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
NGINX
NGINX
Python
Python
Redis
Redis
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Nchan, ws?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase