NestJS vs Rocket

Overview

Rocket

Stacks91

Followers176

Votes12

NestJS

Stacks2.7K

Followers3.0K

Votes326

GitHub Stars73.3K

Forks8.1K

NestJS vs Rocket: What are the differences?

# Introduction
NestJS and Rocket are two popular web frameworks for building server-side applications in TypeScript and Rust respectively.

1. **Programming Language**: The key difference between NestJS and Rocket is the programming language they support. NestJS is built on top of Node.js runtime environment and uses TypeScript for development, whereas Rocket is a web framework for Rust programming language.
   
2. **Type Safety**: NestJS, being built on TypeScript, provides strong typing and compile-time type checking which helps in identifying errors early in the development process. On the other hand, Rust, the language used in Rocket, is known for its memory safety and concurrency features which can lead to more robust and safe code.

3. **Community Support**: NestJS has a larger community of developers due to its association with Node.js and TypeScript, resulting in more libraries, plugins, and resources available for developers. Rocket, being a framework for Rust, has a smaller community but is growing steadily with the popularity of Rust.

4. **Asynchronous Programming**: In NestJS, asynchronous programming is inherent due to the nature of Node.js, making it easy to write non-blocking code. Rust, on the other hand, has built-in support for concurrency and parallelism using concepts like ownership and borrowing that ensure memory safety without sacrificing performance.

5. **Performance**: Rust, the language used in Rocket, is known for its performance and efficiency, making applications built with Rocket potentially faster and more resource-efficient compared to NestJS applications running on Node.js.

6. **Ecosystem Maturity**: NestJS, being built on top of Node.js which has been around for a longer time, has a more mature ecosystem with a wide range of tools, frameworks, and libraries available for developers. Rocket, being relatively newer, is still growing its ecosystem but benefits from Rust's existing ecosystem and tooling.

In Summary, the key differences between NestJS and Rocket lie in the programming language, type safety, community support, asynchronous programming, performance, and ecosystem maturity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Rocket, NestJS

juan9222

Jul 25, 2020

Needs advice

Hi there, I'm deciding the technology to use in my project.

I need to build software that has:

Login
Register
Main View (access to a user account, News, General Info, Business hours, software, and parts section).
Account Preferences.
Web Shop for Parts (Support, Download Sections, Ticket System).

The most critical functionality is a WebSocket that connects between a car that sends real-time data through serial communication, and a server performs diagnosis on the car and sends the results back to the user.

616k views616k

Comments

Louai

Full Stack Web Developer

May 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

Node.js

TypeScript

ExpressJS

I'm planning with a small team to create an application which is a platform for restaurants. I'm on the backend almost alone currently. I'm going to use Node.js for that, and I'm very fond of TypeScript, and I worked before mostly with ExpressJS. The team may get bigger as the application becomes bigger and more successful, so I have the Scalability concern in mind now, and I was considering these options:

Use Node+Express+Typescript
Use Node+NestJs (which utilizes Typescript by default)

Option 2 is enticing to me because recently I came to love NestJS and it provides more scalability for the project and uses Typescript in the best way and uses Express under the hood. Also I come from an Angular 2 background, which I think is the best frontend framework (my opinion, and I know React quite well), which makes Nest feel familiar to me because of the similarity between Nest and Angular. Option 1 on the other hand uses Express which is a minimalist framework, very popular one, but it doesn't provide the same scalability and brings decision fatigue about what to combine with it and may not utilize Typescript in the best way. Yet, on the other hand, it is flexible and it may be easier to manipulate things in different ways with it. Another very important thing is that it would be easier in my view to hire Node developers with skills in Express than NestJs. The majority of Node developers are much more familiar with JavaScript and Express.

What is your advice and why? I would love to hear especially from developers who worked on both Express and Nest

549k views549k

Comments

Slimane

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceon

Spring Boot

NestJS

Node.js

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

917k views917k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rocket	NestJS
Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code.	Nest is a framework for building efficient, scalable Node.js server-side applications. It uses progressive JavaScript, is built with TypeScript (preserves compatibility with pure JavaScript) and combines elements of OOP (Object Oriented Programming), FP (Functional Programming), and FRP (Functional Reactive Programming). Under the hood, Nest makes use of Express, but also, provides compatibility with a wide range of other libraries, like e.g. Fastify, allowing for easy use of the myriad third-party plugins which are available.
From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something; Boilerplate free; Easy to use; Extensible	Extensible - Gives you true flexibility by allowing use of any other libraries thanks to modular architecture.; Versatile - An adaptable ecosystem that is a fully-fledged backbone for all kinds of server-side applications.; Progressive - Takes advantage of latest JavaScript features, bringing design patterns and mature solutions to node.js world.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 73.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 8.1K
Stacks 91	Stacks 2.7K
Followers 176	Followers 3.0K
Votes 12	Votes 326
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Easy to use 4 Uses all the rust features extensively 1 Django analog in rust 1 Inbuilt templating feature 1 Provides nice abstractions Cons 1 Only runs in nightly	Pros 54 Powerful but super friendly to work with 42 Fast development 40 Easy to understand documentation 36 Angular style syntax for the backend 32 NodeJS ecosystem Cons 10 Difficult to debug 10 User base is small. Less help on Stackoverflow 5 Angular-like architecture 3 Updates with breaking changes 3 Javascript
Integrations
Rust	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Rocket, NestJS?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

NestJS vs Rocket: What are the differences?

# Introduction
NestJS and Rocket are two popular web frameworks for building server-side applications in TypeScript and Rust respectively.

1. **Programming Language**: The key difference between NestJS and Rocket is the programming language they support. NestJS is built on top of Node.js runtime environment and uses TypeScript for development, whereas Rocket is a web framework for Rust programming language.
   
2. **Type Safety**: NestJS, being built on TypeScript, provides strong typing and compile-time type checking which helps in identifying errors early in the development process. On the other hand, Rust, the language used in Rocket, is known for its memory safety and concurrency features which can lead to more robust and safe code.

3. **Community Support**: NestJS has a larger community of developers due to its association with Node.js and TypeScript, resulting in more libraries, plugins, and resources available for developers. Rocket, being a framework for Rust, has a smaller community but is growing steadily with the popularity of Rust.

4. **Asynchronous Programming**: In NestJS, asynchronous programming is inherent due to the nature of Node.js, making it easy to write non-blocking code. Rust, on the other hand, has built-in support for concurrency and parallelism using concepts like ownership and borrowing that ensure memory safety without sacrificing performance.

5. **Performance**: Rust, the language used in Rocket, is known for its performance and efficiency, making applications built with Rocket potentially faster and more resource-efficient compared to NestJS applications running on Node.js.

6. **Ecosystem Maturity**: NestJS, being built on top of Node.js which has been around for a longer time, has a more mature ecosystem with a wide range of tools, frameworks, and libraries available for developers. Rocket, being relatively newer, is still growing its ecosystem but benefits from Rust's existing ecosystem and tooling.

In Summary, the key differences between NestJS and Rocket lie in the programming language, type safety, community support, asynchronous programming, performance, and ecosystem maturity.

NestJS vs Rocket

Overview