StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Tailwind CSS vs new.css

Tailwind CSS vs new.css

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS
Stacks4.8K
Followers3.1K
Votes245
new.css
new.css
Stacks3
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.0K
Forks128

Tailwind CSS vs new.css: What are the differences?

  1. Complexity and Customization: One key difference between Tailwind CSS and new.css is the level of complexity and customization they offer. Tailwind CSS provides a comprehensive set of utility classes that allow for highly customized and flexible designs, while new.css focuses on simplicity and minimalism with fewer customization options.

  2. File Size and Performance: Another significant difference is the file size and performance aspect. Tailwind CSS, being a more feature-rich framework, may have a larger file size due to its extensive utility classes, potentially impacting page loading times. On the other hand, new.css is lightweight and designed for efficient performance with minimal impact on loading speeds.

  3. Community Support and Ecosystem: Tailwind CSS has a larger and more active community compared to new.css, leading to a wider range of resources, plugins, and community-driven support. This vibrant ecosystem can be beneficial for developers seeking help, inspiration, or collaboration on projects.

  4. Learning Curve and Documentation: When it comes to the learning curve, Tailwind CSS might have a steeper initial learning curve due to its extensive utility classes and configuration options. In contrast, new.css emphasizes simplicity and straightforward usage, making it more beginner-friendly with concise documentation and easier to grasp concepts.

  5. Flexibility and Design Approach: Tailwind CSS empowers developers to have more control and flexibility over the design and layout of their projects through its utility-first approach. Conversely, new.css follows a more opinionated design philosophy with predefined styles, promoting a more consistent and minimalist design aesthetic across projects.

  6. Browser Compatibility and Support: Tailwind CSS offers broader browser compatibility and support for older browsers through its utility classes and configurable settings. In comparison, new.css may have limitations in terms of browser compatibility, considering its minimalistic design approach that may not cater to all browser types.

In Summary, the differences between Tailwind CSS and new.css lie in complexity, customization, performance, community support, learning curve, flexibility in design approach, and browser compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Tailwind CSS, new.css

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments
Sai Karun
Sai Karun

Jan 30, 2020

Needs advice

We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.

595k views595k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS
new.css
new.css

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

It is a classless CSS framework to write modern websites using only HTML. It automatically applies a light/dark theme based on your browser's preference. It supports custom color themes and fonts using CSS variables.

No default theme; No build-in UI components; No opinion about how your site should look; Doesn't impose design decisions that you have to fight to undo; Comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with; Or offers a head start implementing a custom design with its own identity
~4.5kb in size; Automatically applies a light/dark; Supports custom color themes and fonts using CSS variables
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
128
Stacks
4.8K
Stacks
3
Followers
3.1K
Followers
12
Votes
245
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 44
    Highly customizable
  • 33
    Quick setup
  • 30
    Utility first styles, its amazing
  • 24
    Versatile
  • 23
    Great docs
Cons
  • 14
    Priced
  • 5
    Cluttered html structure
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Tailwind CSS, new.css?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase