StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. NGINX Unit vs Uvicorn

NGINX Unit vs Uvicorn

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX Unit
NGINX Unit
Stacks86
Followers199
Votes11
GitHub Stars5.6K
Forks365
Uvicorn
Uvicorn
Stacks168
Followers119
Votes0

NGINX Unit vs Uvicorn: What are the differences?

Introduction

NGINX Unit and Uvicorn are both web application servers that are commonly used for hosting websites. However, there are several key differences between the two that differentiate their functionality and performance.

  1. Architecture: NGINX Unit is designed as a flexible, dynamic application server that supports multiple programming languages and frameworks. It natively supports Python, PHP, Ruby, Node.js, Java, Go, Perl, and more. On the other hand, Uvicorn is specifically built for Python web applications and is based on the ASGI (Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface) standard.

  2. Performance: NGINX Unit has a highly efficient and scalable architecture, capable of handling high loads and concurrent connections. It utilizes an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model, making it well-suited for heavy traffic scenarios. Uvicorn also offers good performance, leveraging asynchronous programming to handle multiple requests concurrently, but it is primarily optimized for Python and ASGI applications.

  3. Flexibility: NGINX Unit provides a wide range of configuration options and features, giving developers more flexibility in designing their application infrastructure. It supports dynamic application reconfiguration without requiring server restarts, making it easier to manage and scale applications. Uvicorn, being focused on Python and ASGI, provides a simpler and more streamlined configuration process, but with fewer customization options compared to NGINX Unit.

  4. Logging and Monitoring: NGINX Unit offers extensive logging and monitoring capabilities, allowing developers to easily track and analyze server activities. It provides built-in support for logging HTTP requests, errors, and application-specific events, making troubleshooting and performance optimization easier. Uvicorn, while it offers basic logging functionality, may require additional tools or libraries for comprehensive monitoring and analysis.

  5. Community and Support: NGINX Unit is backed by NGINX, a widely adopted and well-established web server platform, which brings a large community and extensive support resources. Developers can benefit from a wealth of documentation, forums, and user-contributed modules, ensuring ongoing development and support. Uvicorn, while it has a growing community and several active contributors, may have more limited resources and support compared to NGINX Unit.

  6. Deployment and Integration: NGINX Unit can be easily integrated into existing NGINX-based infrastructure or used as a standalone application server. It provides seamless integration with NGINX web server and reverse proxy, allowing for flexible deployment scenarios. Uvicorn can also be deployed as a standalone server or integrated into a web server like NGINX or Apache using appropriate interfaces, but may require additional configuration and setup steps.

In summary, NGINX Unit offers a more versatile and flexible solution with support for multiple languages and frameworks, while Uvicorn is specifically tailored for Python web applications and provides a more streamlined and Python-centric approach to server hosting.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

NGINX Unit
NGINX Unit
Uvicorn
Uvicorn

NGINX Unit is a dynamic web application server, designed to run applications in multiple languages. Unit is lightweight, polyglot, and dynamically configured via API. The design of the server allows reconfiguration of specific application parameters as needed by the engineering or operations.

It is a lightning-fast ASGI server, built on uvloop and httptools. Until recently Python has lacked a minimal low-level server/application interface for asyncio frameworks. The ASGI specification fills this gap, and means we're now able to start building a common set of tooling usable across all asyncio frameworks.

Fully dynamic reconfiguration using RESTful JSON API;Multiple application languages and versions can run simultaneously;Dynamic application processes management (coming soon);TLS support (coming soon);TCP, HTTP, HTTPS, HTTP/2 routing and proxying (coming soon)
ASGI server implementation; Supports HTTP/1.1 and WebSockets; Support for HTTP/2 is planned
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
365
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
86
Stacks
168
Followers
199
Followers
119
Votes
11
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    PHP
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Multilang
  • 2
    Python
  • 1
    Ruby
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Perl
Perl
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to NGINX Unit, Uvicorn?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase