StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Prototyping
  4. Mobile Prototyping Interaction Design Tools
  5. Origami vs Pop

Origami vs Pop

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Origami
Origami
Stacks45
Followers95
Votes11
Pop
Pop
Stacks29
Followers32
Votes0

Origami vs Pop: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Origami and Pop frameworks.

  1. Origin and Purpose: Origami is a JavaScript framework developed by The Financial Times to build responsive web design components. It focuses on providing a flexible and modular approach for creating reusable components. On the other hand, Pop is a simple and lightweight animation framework developed by the Popmotion community. It is designed to provide smooth and performant animations across a wide range of browsers.

  2. Animation Capabilities: Origami primarily focuses on creating interactive and responsive components, rather than providing extensive animation capabilities. It provides features like responsive layout, touch interaction, and accessibility. Pop, on the other hand, specializes in animation with a rich set of animation functions and control over easing, duration, and delay. It supports various animation types like keyframe animations, physics-based animations, and tweening.

  3. Integration with Design Tools: Origami is tightly integrated with Origami Studio, a design tool developed by Facebook. This allows designers to directly import and preview their designs in the Origami framework, facilitating quick prototyping and iteration. Pop, however, does not have any specific design tool integration and can be used independently.

  4. Community and Support: Origami has a strong community of developers, primarily due to the backing of The Financial Times. It has comprehensive documentation, a dedicated website, and regular updates. Pop, being an open-source community-driven project, also has an active community and support channels. However, its documentation and resources may not be as extensive as Origami.

  5. Bundle Size and Performance: Origami is a powerful framework with a wide range of features and components, which results in a larger bundle size. Although efforts have been made to optimize performance, it can have a higher resource footprint compared to Pop. Pop, being a lightweight animation framework, offers better performance and smaller bundle size due to its minimalistic design and focused scope.

  6. Learning Curve and Complexity: Origami's approach to building components and interaction logic can be more complex and require familiarity with its specific concepts and patterns. This can result in a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to Origami. Pop, on the other hand, is relatively easier to start with and has a simpler API. Its straightforward syntax and intuitive animation controls make it more accessible for developers of all skill levels.

In summary, Origami is a flexible JavaScript framework focusing on creating reusable components and responsive web design, while Pop is a lightweight animation framework specializing in smooth and performant animations. Origami is more integrated with design tools, has a larger community and bundle size, and offers a steeper learning curve. On the other hand, Pop excels in animation capabilities, provides better performance, and is easier to get started with.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Origami
Origami
Pop
Pop

Origami is a free toolkit for Quartz Composer—created by the Facebook Design team—that makes interactive design prototyping easy and doesn’t require programming.

Pop is an extensible animation engine for iOS and OS X. In addition to basic static animations, it supports spring and decay dynamic animations, making it useful for building realistic, physics-based interactions. The API allows quick integration with existing Objective-C codebases and enables the animation of any property on any object. It's a mature and well-tested framework that drives all the animations and transitions in Paper.

Switch- Toggles between on and off and remembers its current state.;Scroll- Lets you allow the user to scroll an image.;Bouncy Animation- Animate a changing value with a bouncy spring.;Classic Animation- Animate a changing number with a specified duration and easing curve.;Transition- Takes a number in the range of 0 to 1 and converts it to a range starting with Start Value and ending in End Value.;Color Transition- Fades between two colors.
-
Statistics
Stacks
45
Stacks
29
Followers
95
Followers
32
Votes
11
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Free
  • 3
    Visualize animations and transitions
  • 2
    The Awesomeness
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Origami, Pop?

Framer

Framer

Framer is a JavaScript framework that makes creating realistic prototypes a breeze – complete with filters, spring physics and full 3D effects. Framer Generator is a desktop app that imports the resources and folder hierarchy from Photoshop files (Sketch coming soon). Import your design and immediately start to add interaction and animation.

ProtoPie

ProtoPie

It is the easiest tool used to turn your UI/UX design ideas into highly interactive prototypes for mobile, desktop, web, all the way to IoT. ProtoPie runs on macOS & Windows and the player app is on iOS and Android.

Supernova

Supernova

Supernova converts any mobile design to full-fledged native applications, giving the developers extra time to do actual coding. No need to export resources, write navigation, connect it to components created by hand, read styles, apply styles, copy-paste information..

Lottie

Lottie

Lottie is a mobile library for Android and iOS that parses Adobe After Effects animations exported as json with Bodymovin and renders them natively on mobile!

Material

Material

Express your creativity with Material, an animation and graphics framework for Google's Material Design and Apple's Flat UI in Swift.

Principle

Principle

It makes it easy to design animated and interactive user interfaces. Whether you're designing the flow of a multi-screen app, or new interactions and animations, it helps you create designs that look and feel amazing.

Fuse

Fuse

It is a set of user experience development tools that unify design, prototyping and implementation of high quality, native apps for iOS and Android.

Flinto

Flinto

It is a Mac app used by designers around the world to create interactive and animated prototypes of their app designs. It lets designers quickly make interactive prototypes of their mobile, desktop, or web apps.

Fiber

Fiber

Fiber UI Kit is the perfect starting place for your next project. Each element has been designed to work independently or as one seamless flow. It’s a full-fledged prototype with customizable components.

Avocado

Avocado

Avocado is an open source interaction design toolbox built by​ IDEO.​ It ​enables designers to make quick interactive prototypes without writing a line of code.​ ​Built on top of Facebook's Origami framework, Avocado provides ready-to-use patches that can be easily combined to create fully-customized prototypes.​ Official announcement: http://labs.ideo.com/2014/05/27/avocado/

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope