PHP-MVC vs OSGi

Overview

PHP-MVC

Stacks106

Followers222

Votes3

OSGi

Stacks79

Followers118

Votes10

OSGi vs PHP-MVC: What are the differences?

Developers describe OSGi as "The Dynamic Module System for Java". It is a Java framework for developing and deploying modular software programs and libraries. It provides a vendor-independent, standards-based approach to modularizing Java software applications and infrastructure. On the other hand, PHP-MVC is detailed as "Simple and easy to understand MVC skeleton application". This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.

OSGi and PHP-MVC belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

PHP-MVC is an open source tool with 1.26K GitHub stars and 495 GitHub forks. Here's a link to PHP-MVC's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, PHP-MVC has a broader approval, being mentioned in 16 company stacks & 34 developers stacks; compared to OSGi, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 9 developer stacks.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Node.js Frameworks

A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

566

165k

Detailed Comparison

PHP-MVC	OSGi
This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.	It is a Java framework for developing and deploying modular software programs and libraries. It provides a vendor-independent, standards-based approach to modularizing Java software applications and infrastructure.
Statistics
Stacks 106	Stacks 79
Followers 222	Followers 118
Votes 3	Votes 10
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Easy to Learn	Pros 2 Componentization of software modules 2 Open source 2 Component-based platform 1 Remote management 1 Easier to modify Cons 1 Bound to eclipse
Integrations
PHP	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to PHP-MVC, OSGi?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.