StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Blockchain
  5. Parity vs Web3j

Parity vs Web3j

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Web3j
Web3j
Stacks43
Followers39
Votes0
Parity
Parity
Stacks6
Followers9
Votes0

Parity vs Web3j: What are the differences?

  1. Key difference 1: Parity is an Ethereum client that provides advanced features and security measures for interacting with the Ethereum blockchain. It is written in the Rust programming language and is known for its high performance and reliability. On the other hand, Web3j is a lightweight and highly modular Java library for integrating applications with the Ethereum blockchain. It allows developers to interact with the Ethereum network and smart contracts using Java.

  2. Key difference 2: Parity supports multiple networks and chain types, including Ethereum mainnet, testnets, and private chains. It provides the flexibility to connect to different networks based on the use case requirements. Meanwhile, Web3j primarily focuses on connecting to the Ethereum mainnet and testnets, making it a suitable choice for applications that only require interaction with the public Ethereum network.

  3. Key difference 3: Parity offers a comprehensive set of developer tools and APIs, allowing developers to build complex decentralized applications (dApps) with ease. It provides features like Ethereum JSON-RPC, WebSocket subscriptions, and a powerful JavaScript console. On the contrary, Web3j provides a simplified and streamlined API for interacting with the Ethereum network. It offers functionalities like smart contract deployment, transaction handling, and event monitoring in a more intuitive manner.

  4. Key difference 4: Parity has built-in support for Ethereum improvement proposals (EIPs) and follows the latest Ethereum standards. It ensures compatibility with the Ethereum ecosystem and allows developers to leverage new features and protocols introduced by the Ethereum community. Meanwhile, Web3j also strives for compatibility but is primarily focused on providing a Java-centric development experience, which might lead to a slight lag in adopting the latest Ethereum standards and protocols.

  5. Key difference 5: Parity provides advanced security features like customizable whitelists, runtime code analysis, and permissioned networks, making it suitable for enterprises and consortium blockchain projects with specific security requirements. Conversely, Web3j focuses more on simplicity and ease of use, catering to a wider range of developers who require basic Ethereum integration without the need for advanced security features.

  6. Key difference 6: Parity is backed and maintained by Parity Technologies, a company known for its expertise in blockchain development. It has a vibrant community of developers and contributors, ensuring ongoing support and updates to the Parity client. Meanwhile, Web3j is an open-source project supported by the Ethereum Foundation and community, with regular updates and contributions from developers around the world.

In Summary, Parity is a feature-rich Ethereum client with advanced security features, while Web3j is a lightweight Java library focused on simplicity and ease of use for Ethereum integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Web3j
Web3j
Parity
Parity

It is a lightweight, highly modular, reactive, type safe Java and Android library for working with Smart Contracts and integrating with clients (nodes) on the Ethereum network. This allows you to work with the Ethereum blockchain, without the additional overhead of having to write your own integration code for the platform.

Blockchain Infrastructure for the Decentralised Web From the Substrate blockchain framework to Polkadot, the sharded protocol enabling blockchains to operate seamlessly together at scale, Parity builds the foundation of Web 3.0.

Complete implementation of Ethereum's JSON-RPC client API over HTTP and IPC; Ethereum wallet support; Auto-generation of Java smart contract wrappers to create, deploy, transact with and call smart contracts from native Java code (Solidity and Truffle definition formats supported); Reactive-functional API for working with filters; Ethereum Name Service (ENS) support; Support for Parity's Personal, and Geth's Personal client APIs; Support for Infura, so you don't have to run an Ethereum client yourself
-
Statistics
Stacks
43
Stacks
6
Followers
39
Followers
9
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Ethereum
Ethereum
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Web3j, Parity?

Quarkus

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

MyBatis

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

Ethereum

Ethereum

A decentralized platform for applications that run exactly as programmed without any chance of fraud, censorship or third-party interference.

Hyperledger Fabric

Hyperledger Fabric

It is a collaborative effort created to advance blockchain technology by identifying and addressing important features and currently missing requirements. It leverages container technology to host smart contracts called “chaincode” that comprise the application logic of the system.

guava

guava

The Guava project contains several of Google's core libraries that we rely on in our Java-based projects: collections, caching, primitives support, concurrency libraries, common annotations, string processing, I/O, and so forth.

Thymeleaf

Thymeleaf

It is a modern server-side Java template engine for both web and standalone environments. It is aimed at creating elegant web code while adding powerful features and retaining prototyping abilities.

JSF

JSF

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

Tendermint

Tendermint

It is a software which can be used to achieve Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) in any distributed computing platforms. It consists of two chief technical components: a blockchain consensus engine and a generic application interface.

MultiChain

MultiChain

It is a platform that helps users to establish a certain private Blockchains that can be used by the organizations for financial transactions.

JavaMelody

JavaMelody

It is used to monitor Java or Java EE application servers in QA and production environments. It is not a tool to simulate requests from users, it is a tool to measure and calculate statistics on real operation of an application depending on the usage of the application by users. It is mainly based on statistics of requests and on evolution charts.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase