Overview

Phalcon

Stacks246

Followers294

Votes354

GitHub Stars10.8K

Forks2.0K

Phoenix Framework

Stacks1.0K

Followers1.0K

Votes678

GitHub Stars22.6K

Forks3.0K

Phalcon vs Phoenix Framework: What are the differences?

Programming Language: Phalcon is written in C/C++ with a PHP extension, which provides fast execution speed, whereas Phoenix is written in Elixir, a functional programming language built on top of Erlang VM, making it suitable for concurrent and distributed systems.
Built-in ORM: Phalcon comes with its own ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) called PHQL, which allows developers to interact with databases without writing SQL queries directly. On the other hand, Phoenix uses Ecto, a widely-used ORM for Elixir applications that offers a rich set of features for database interactions.
Template Engine: Phalcon uses Volt as its default template engine, which provides two-way data binding and fast rendering capabilities. Phoenix, on the other hand, uses EEx (Embedded Elixir), a template engine that embeds Elixir code directly into HTML templates for dynamic content generation.
Community Support: Phalcon has been around for a longer time and has a well-established community with a wide range of resources and plugins available. Phoenix, although newer, has been gaining popularity rapidly with an active community that contributes to its growth and development.
Scalability: Phalcon is known for its speed and low resource consumption, making it a good choice for small to medium-sized applications. Phoenix, leveraging the Erlang VM, is highly scalable and fault-tolerant, making it ideal for large-scale distributed systems that require high availability and fault tolerance.
Learning Curve: Phalcon, being a PHP framework, is easier for developers familiar with PHP to pick up and start working with. Phoenix, being based on Elixir, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to functional programming paradigms, but offers benefits in terms of concurrency and fault tolerance once mastered.

In Summary, Phalcon and Phoenix Framework differ in their programming language, ORM implementations, template engines, community support, scalability, and learning curves.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Node.js Frameworks

A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

566

165k

Advice on Phalcon, Phoenix Framework

Jakes

Mar 21, 2021

Decided

#rust @{#elixir}|topic:null| So am creating a messenger with voice call capabilities app which the user signs up using phone number and so at first i wanted to use Actix so i learned Rust so i thought to myself because well its first i felt its a bit immature to use actix web even though some companies are using Rust but we cant really say the full potential of Rust in a full scale app for example in Discord both Elixir and Rust are used meaning there is equal need for them but for Elixir so many companies use it from Whatsapp, Wechat, etc and this means something for Rust is not ready to go full scale we cant assume all this possibilities when it come Rust. So i decided to go the Erlang way after alot of Thinking so Do you think i made the right decision?Am 19 year programmer so i assume am not experienced as you so your answer or comment would really valuable to me

284k views284k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Phalcon	Phoenix Framework
Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.	Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 10.8K	GitHub Stars 22.6K
GitHub Forks 2.0K	GitHub Forks 3.0K
Stacks 246	Stacks 1.0K
Followers 294	Followers 1.0K
Votes 354	Votes 678
Pros & Cons
Pros 65 Fast 54 High performance 37 Open source 35 Fast and easy to use 32 Scalable Cons 4 Support few databases 2 Very bad documentation	Pros 120 High performance 76 Super fast 70 Rapid development 62 Open source 60 Erlang VM Cons 6 No jobs 5 Very difficult
Integrations
PHP	Elixir

What are some alternatives to Phalcon, Phoenix Framework?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.