StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. PHP-MVC vs Rocket

PHP-MVC vs Rocket

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Stacks106
Followers222
Votes3
Rocket
Rocket
Stacks91
Followers176
Votes12

PHP-MVC vs Rocket: What are the differences?

# Differences between PHP-MVC and Rocket

PHP-MVC and Rocket are both popular web development frameworks, each with its unique features and advantages. Below are key differences between PHP-MVC and Rocket:

1. **Language Compatibility**: PHP-MVC is based on PHP, a server-side scripting language, while Rocket is written in the Rust programming language, known for its speed and memory safety.
2. **Runtime Performance**: Rust, the language on which Rocket is built, is known for its blazing-fast performance due to its zero-cost abstractions and control over memory management. On the other hand, PHP can be slower in terms of performance compared to Rust. 
3. **Ease of Deployment**: PHP traditionally runs on a LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) stack, making deployment relatively straightforward for PHP-MVC applications. In contrast, Rocket applications may require more complex deployment setups, particularly for hosting environments not optimized for Rust applications.
4. **Community Support**: PHP-MVC benefits from a large and active community of developers, resulting in extensive documentation, libraries, and resources available to developers. While Rocket has a growing community, it may not have the same level of support and resources as PHP-MVC.
5. **Learning Curve**: Due to its simplicity and widespread usage, PHP-MVC may have a lower learning curve for beginners compared to Rocket, which requires familiarity with Rust and its unique characteristics such as ownership, borrowing, and lifetime management.
6. **Error Handling**: Rust, the language of Rocket, enforces strict compile-time checks for errors, ensuring more robust error handling compared to PHP, which relies more on runtime error handling practices.

In Summary, PHP-MVC is known for its ease of use and wide community support, while Rocket offers superior performance and strong error handling capabilities at the cost of a potentially steeper learning curve and more complex deployment setups. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Rocket
Rocket

This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.

Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code.

-
From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something; Boilerplate free; Easy to use; Extensible
Statistics
Stacks
106
Stacks
91
Followers
222
Followers
176
Votes
3
Votes
12
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to Learn
Pros
  • 5
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Uses all the rust features extensively
  • 1
    Inbuilt templating feature
  • 1
    Provides nice abstractions
  • 1
    Django analog in rust
Cons
  • 1
    Only runs in nightly
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to PHP-MVC, Rocket?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase