StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. PHP-MVC vs Tornado

PHP-MVC vs Tornado

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Tornado
Tornado
Stacks530
Followers409
Votes167
GitHub Stars22.3K
Forks5.5K
PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Stacks106
Followers222
Votes3

PHP-MVC vs Tornado: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between PHP-MVC and Tornado frameworks.

  1. Language: PHP-MVC is based on PHP, a server-side scripting language primarily used for web development, while Tornado is based on Python, known for its readability and versatility in both web and non-web applications.

  2. Architecture: PHP-MVC follows the Model-View-Controller pattern, separating the application into three components, whereas Tornado follows a non-blocking asynchronous design, making it suitable for handling high levels of concurrency without blocking I/O operations.

  3. Community Support: PHP-MVC has been around for a longer time, leading to a larger community and a plethora of resources available online, while Tornado, although newer, benefits from the strong and active Python community.

  4. Performance: Tornado is known for its high performance due to its non-blocking I/O design, making it a great choice for applications with high traffic, while PHP-MVC may require optimization and caching strategies to achieve similar performance levels.

  5. Scalability: Tornado's asynchronous design allows for easy scaling by adding more server instances or using techniques like distributed computing, making it a preferred choice for large and complex applications compared to PHP-MVC.

  6. Ease of Use: PHP-MVC may be considered easier to learn and use for beginners due to its widespread popularity and abundant resources, while Tornado's asynchronous nature and Python syntax may require a steeper learning curve for some developers.

Summary

In Summary, PHP-MVC and Tornado differ in their language, architecture, community support, performance, scalability, and ease of use, making them suitable for different types of web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tornado
Tornado
PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC

By using non-blocking network I/O, Tornado can scale to tens of thousands of open connections, making it ideal for long polling, WebSockets, and other applications that require a long-lived connection to each user.

This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
530
Stacks
106
Followers
409
Followers
222
Votes
167
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 37
    Open source
  • 31
    So fast
  • 27
    Great for microservices architecture
  • 20
    Websockets
  • 17
    Simple
Cons
  • 2
    Event loop is complicated
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to Learn
Integrations
Python
Python
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Tornado, PHP-MVC?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase