Pingy CLI vs Webpack

Overview

Webpack

Stacks45.0K

Followers28.1K

Votes752

GitHub Stars65.7K

Forks9.2K

Pingy CLI

Stacks3

Followers11

Votes12

GitHub Stars381

Forks15

Pingy CLI vs Webpack: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the context of website development tools, Pingy CLI and Webpack are both popular choices. Understanding the key differences between these two tools can help developers make informed decisions on which one to use for their projects.

Configuration Complexity: Pingy CLI is designed to have zero configuration, making it a straightforward choice for beginners or those looking for a simple setup. On the other hand, Webpack requires more configuration and setup, which can be overwhelming for beginners or small projects.
Performance: When it comes to performance, Pingy CLI tends to be faster in terms of build times compared to Webpack. This is because Pingy CLI has a minimalistic approach and focuses on speed and efficiency in project builds.
Plugin Ecosystem: Webpack has a vast and robust ecosystem of plugins that offer extensive customization options for developers. Pingy CLI, on the other hand, has a limited number of plugins available, which may restrict the flexibility and customization potential of projects.
Community Support: Webpack has a large and active community of developers, which means there are plenty of resources, tutorials, and forums available for troubleshooting and support. Pingy CLI, being a newer tool, may have a smaller community at the moment, which could impact the level of support and resources available.
Ease of Use: Pingy CLI is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive commands, making it a straightforward tool for beginners to pick up and start using. In contrast, Webpack has a steeper learning curve due to its complex configuration and setup process, which may require more time and effort to master.
Out-of-the-Box Features: Pingy CLI includes a range of built-in features and tools that are commonly used in modern web development, such as hot module reloading and CSS preprocessing. Webpack, while powerful, may require additional configurations or plugins to achieve similar functionalities.

In Summary, Pingy CLI and Webpack differ in terms of configuration complexity, performance, plugin ecosystem, community support, ease of use, and out-of-the-box features, offering developers a choice based on their specific project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Webpack, Pingy CLI

Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.

301k views301k

Comments

Rob

Tech Lead at Runa

Mar 15, 2021

Decided

The developer experience Webpack gave us was not delighting anyone. It works and is stable and consistent. It is also slow and frustrating. We decided to check out Vite as an alternative when moving to Vue 3 and have been amazed. It is very early in development and there are plenty of rough edges, but it has been a breath of fresh air not waiting for anything to update. It is so fast we have found ourselves using devtools in browser less because changing styles is just as fast in code. We felt confident using the tool because although it is early in its development, the production build is still provided by Rollup which is a mature tool. We also felt optimistic that as good as it is right now, it will only continue to get better, as it is being worked on very actively. So far we are really happy with the choice.

55.8k views55.8k

Comments

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Webpack	Pingy CLI
A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.	Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.
Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 65.7K	GitHub Stars 381
GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks 15
Stacks 45.0K	Stacks 3
Followers 28.1K	Followers 11
Votes 752	Votes 12
Pros & Cons
Pros 309 Most powerful bundler 182 Built-in dev server with livereload 142 Can handle all types of assets 87 Easy configuration 22 Laravel-mix Cons 15 Hard to configure 5 No clear direction 2 Spaghetti-Code out of the box 2 Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy) 2 SystemJS integration is quite lackluster	Pros 2 Just works 2 No plugins needed 2 Easy 2 Fast 2 No Configuration
Integrations
JavaScript	npm JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Webpack, Pingy CLI?

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Microbundle

Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

System.js

It is a Universal Module Loader for JavaScript. If you've used RequireJs or a CommonJs bundler in the past, you have probably created modules.Configurable module loader enabling dynamic ES module workflows in browsers and NodeJS.

Esbuild

It is an extremely fast JavaScript and CSS bundler and minifier. Current build tools for the web are 10-100x slower than they could be. The main goal of this project is to bring about a new era of build tool performance, and create an easy-to-use modern bundler along the way.

Related Comparisons

Pingy CLI vs Webpack: What are the differences?

Configuration Complexity: Pingy CLI is designed to have zero configuration, making it a straightforward choice for beginners or those looking for a simple setup. On the other hand, Webpack requires more configuration and setup, which can be overwhelming for beginners or small projects.
Performance: When it comes to performance, Pingy CLI tends to be faster in terms of build times compared to Webpack. This is because Pingy CLI has a minimalistic approach and focuses on speed and efficiency in project builds.
Plugin Ecosystem: Webpack has a vast and robust ecosystem of plugins that offer extensive customization options for developers. Pingy CLI, on the other hand, has a limited number of plugins available, which may restrict the flexibility and customization potential of projects.
Community Support: Webpack has a large and active community of developers, which means there are plenty of resources, tutorials, and forums available for troubleshooting and support. Pingy CLI, being a newer tool, may have a smaller community at the moment, which could impact the level of support and resources available.
Ease of Use: Pingy CLI is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive commands, making it a straightforward tool for beginners to pick up and start using. In contrast, Webpack has a steeper learning curve due to its complex configuration and setup process, which may require more time and effort to master.
Out-of-the-Box Features: Pingy CLI includes a range of built-in features and tools that are commonly used in modern web development, such as hot module reloading and CSS preprocessing. Webpack, while powerful, may require additional configurations or plugins to achieve similar functionalities.

Pingy CLI vs Webpack

Overview