Pippo vs Total.js

Overview

Pippo

Stacks2

Followers10

Votes6

Total.js

Stacks20

Followers62

Votes37

GitHub Stars4.4K

Forks446

Pippo vs Total.js: What are the differences?

Developers describe Pippo as "Web framework in Java". It's an open source (Apache License) micro web framework in Java, with minimal dependencies and a quick learning curve. The goal of this project is to create a micro web framework in Java that should be easy to use and hack. Pippo can be used in small and medium applications and also in applications based on micro services architecture. On the other hand, Total.js is detailed as "Framework for creating rich web sites, web applications, e-commerce and real-time applications". It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC.

Pippo and Total.js belong to "Microframeworks (Backend)" category of the tech stack.

Pippo and Total.js are both open source tools. It seems that Total.js with 3.97K GitHub stars and 434 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Pippo with 713 GitHub stars and 104 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pippo	Total.js
It's an open source (Apache License) micro web framework in Java, with minimal dependencies and a quick learning curve. The goal of this project is to create a micro web framework in Java that should be easy to use and hack. Pippo can be used in small and medium applications and also in applications based on micro services architecture.	It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC
-	Super fast development; Extremely low maintenance costs; Rock solid stability; Incredible performance; Easy scaling
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 446
Stacks 2	Stacks 20
Followers 10	Followers 62
Votes 6	Votes 37
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Java 1 Easy setup 1 Integration with Spring & CDI & Guice 1 Optional integration with Metrics (Ganglia,...) 1 CSRF Support	Pros 5 Rapid development 5 Fast 4 Low-code tools 4 Great support 3 Prebuild apps Cons 3 Lack of source code documentation 2 Developed as "one man show" 2 Poor design 2 Poor design - 4000 line files 2 Messes up global namespace and default prototypes
Integrations
Java	npm Node.js PostGraphile Sentry

What are some alternatives to Pippo, Total.js?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Pippo vs Total.js