Poltergeist vs Spock Framework

Overview

Poltergeist

Stacks17

Followers24

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.5K

Forks414

Spock Framework

Stacks694

Followers84

Votes23

GitHub Stars3.6K

Forks475

Poltergeist vs Spock Framework: What are the differences?

Poltergeist: A PhantomJS driver for Capybara. Poltergeist is a driver for Capybara. It allows you to run your Capybara tests on a headless WebKit browser, provided by PhantomJS; Spock Framework: The Enterprise-ready testing and specification framework. It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Poltergeist and Spock Framework can be primarily classified as "Testing Frameworks" tools.

Poltergeist and Spock Framework are both open source tools. It seems that Poltergeist with 2.53K GitHub stars and 436 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Spock Framework with 2.42K GitHub stars and 368 GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, Spock Framework has a broader approval, being mentioned in 7 company stacks & 15 developers stacks; compared to Poltergeist, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 7 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Poltergeist	Spock Framework
Poltergeist is a driver for Capybara. It allows you to run your Capybara tests on a headless WebKit browser, provided by PhantomJS.	It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.5K	GitHub Stars 3.6K
GitHub Forks 414	GitHub Forks 475
Stacks 17	Stacks 694
Followers 24	Followers 84
Votes 0	Votes 23
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 7 Ease of use via the Given/When/Then approach 5 Verbose output for test failures 5 Built-in mocking library 5 Easily write one test with multiple cases 1 Parametrisation
Integrations
Capybara PhantomJS	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Poltergeist, Spock Framework?

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language