StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Propel ORM vs TypeORM

Propel ORM vs TypeORM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Propel ORM
Propel ORM
Stacks7
Followers5
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks400
TypeORM
TypeORM
Stacks756
Followers813
Votes81
GitHub Stars36.0K
Forks6.5K

Propel ORM vs TypeORM: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Database Support: Propel ORM primarily supports MySQL, SQLite, PostgreSQL, and MSSQL databases, while TypeORM supports a broader range of databases such as MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL, SQLite, Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle, and MongoDB.
  2. Programming Language Compatibility: Propel ORM is known for its PHP compatibility, while TypeORM is specifically designed for TypeScript and JavaScript environments.
  3. Entity Relationships: Propel ORM provides support for relationships like one-to-many, many-to-many, and inheritance mappings, whereas TypeORM offers advanced support for entity relationships with features like eager and lazy loading, cascades, and more.
  4. Query Language: Propel ORM uses Criteria queries for generating SQL queries, while TypeORM utilizes a repository pattern with custom query builders or a QueryBuilder to generate SQL statements.
  5. Community and Support: Propel ORM has been around for a longer period with an established community and documentation, whereas TypeORM is gaining popularity and has an active community but may not have as extensive documentation and resources as Propel ORM.
  6. Active Record vs. Data Mapper Pattern: Propel ORM follows the Data Mapper pattern, separating database logic from domain logic, while TypeORM adopts the Active Record pattern, where database logic is intertwined with domain logic in the entity classes.
In Summary, Propel ORM and TypeORM differ in database support, programming language compatibility, entity relationship handling, query language, community support, and architectural patterns.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Propel ORM
Propel ORM
TypeORM
TypeORM

It is an open-source Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) for SQL-Databases in PHP 5.5. It allows you to access your database using a set of objects, providing a simple API for storing and retrieving data.

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Highly customizable and blazing fast; ORM library for PHP 5.5+; Supports schema migration for MySQL, SQLite and PostgreSQL; For existing database structures we support reverse enginering of your current database schema; generates all of your getter and setter as well as filter, relation methods and much more for you
automatically create the database table schemes based on your models; transparently insert / update / delete to the database your objects; map your selections from tables to JavaScript objects and map table columns to object properties; easily create one-to-one, many-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many relations between tables; and much more.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Stars
36.0K
GitHub Forks
400
GitHub Forks
6.5K
Stacks
7
Stacks
756
Followers
5
Followers
813
Votes
0
Votes
81
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 30
    Typescript
  • 12
    Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Ser
  • 9
    Cons of TypeORM
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 7
    Works in NodeJS, Browser, Ionic, Cordova and Electron p
Cons
  • 5
    Completely abandoned by its creator
  • 3
    Too complex for what it does
  • 2
    Doesn't really support native javascript
  • 1
    Cannot use query on any relation
  • 1
    Not proper/real type safety
Integrations
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Oracle
Oracle
PHP
PHP
SQLite
SQLite
MSSQL
MSSQL
MySQL
MySQL
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Propel ORM, TypeORM?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Sequelize

Sequelize

Sequelize is a promise-based ORM for Node.js and io.js. It supports the dialects PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite and MSSQL and features solid transaction support, relations, read replication and more.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase