StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtualization Platform
  5. Proxmox VE vs Qemu

Proxmox VE vs Qemu

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE
Stacks352
Followers334
Votes41
Qemu
Qemu
Stacks105
Followers131
Votes3

Proxmox VE vs Qemu: What are the differences?

Proxmox VE and QEMU are virtualization platforms used for creating and managing virtual machines and containers. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Virtualization Type: The key difference between Proxmox VE and Qemu lies in their virtualization types. Proxmox VE is a full-fledged virtualization platform that utilizes the KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) hypervisor. On the other hand, Qemu is a hardware emulation and virtualization framework that supports different hypervisors such as KVM, Xen, and Hyper-V. This means that Proxmox VE provides a more integrated and optimized virtualization experience compared to Qemu, which is more versatile but may require additional configurations for different hypervisors.

  2. Management Interface: Proxmox VE offers a comprehensive web-based management interface, known as the Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) GUI. This interface allows users to easily manage their virtual machines, storage, networking, and other aspects of the virtualization environment. In contrast, Qemu does not provide a dedicated management interface, and users need to rely on command-line tools or third-party graphical frontends to manage their virtual machines and resources effectively.

  3. High Availability (HA) and Clustering: Proxmox VE supports built-in high availability and clustering features, allowing users to create highly available virtual clusters with automatic failover capabilities. This means that if one physical host fails, the virtual machines will automatically be migrated to another host in the cluster, ensuring continuous uptime. On the other hand, Qemu does not have built-in HA and clustering capabilities, and users need to rely on external solutions or manual configurations to achieve similar levels of high availability.

  4. Containerization Support: Proxmox VE includes support for containerization through the use of LXC (Linux Containers). LXC allows users to create lightweight and isolated environments, commonly referred to as containers, which share the host system's kernel while providing a separate user space. This enables efficient resource utilization and faster startup times. Qemu, on the other hand, does not natively support containerization and focuses primarily on virtual machine (VM) deployments.

  5. Backup and Restore: Proxmox VE provides built-in backup and restore functionality, allowing users to easily create snapshots and backups of their virtual machines. These backups can be stored locally, on network-attached storage (NAS), or in remote locations. The backup process is automated and can be scheduled at regular intervals. Comparatively, Qemu does not include native backup and restore capabilities, requiring users to rely on external tools or manual procedures to achieve similar functionality.

  6. Commercial Support and Subscription: Proxmox VE offers commercial support and subscription options for users who require professional assistance with their virtualization infrastructure. The Proxmox subscription provides additional features, updates, and access to the Proxmox support team. On the other hand, Qemu is primarily an open-source project and does not provide official commercial support options. However, there are commercial vendors that offer support services for Qemu-based virtualization deployments.

In summary, Proxmox VE offers a more integrated and user-friendly virtualization experience with its KVM-based hypervisor, comprehensive management interface, built-in HA and clustering capabilities, containerization support, native backup and restore functionality, and commercial support options. Qemu, on the other hand, provides a versatile virtualization framework that supports multiple hypervisors, but lacks some of the advanced features and integrated management found in Proxmox VE.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE
Qemu
Qemu

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

-
machine emulator and virtualizer; dynamic translation;
Statistics
Stacks
352
Stacks
105
Followers
334
Followers
131
Votes
41
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    HA VM & LXC devices
  • 8
    Ease of use
  • 7
    Robust architecture
  • 6
    Avoid vendor lock-in
  • 6
    Free
Pros
  • 1
    Performance
  • 1
    Free
  • 1
    Easy to use
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
KVM
KVM

What are some alternatives to Proxmox VE, Qemu?

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

VMware vSphere

VMware vSphere

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

KVM

KVM

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Parallels

Parallels

It is an application and desktop virtualization software vendor that offers management and delivery platforms for Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows desktop deployments.

VMware Fusion

VMware Fusion

It gives Mac users the power to run Windows on Mac along with hundreds of other operating systems side by side with Mac applications, without rebooting. It is simple enough for home users and powerful enough for IT professionals, developers and businesses.

Xen

Xen

It is a hypervisor using a microkernel design, providing services that allow multiple computer operating systems to execute on the same computer hardware concurrently. It was developed by the Linux Foundation and is supported by Intel.

VMware vSAN

VMware vSAN

It is enterprise-class, storage virtualization software that, when combined with vSphere, allows you to manage compute and storage with a single platform. You can reduce the cost and complexity of traditional storage and take the easiest path to hyperconverged infrastructure and hybrid cloud. Evolve to an integrated hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solution with vSAN to improve business agility, all while speeding operations and lowering costs.

Oracle VM Server

Oracle VM Server

It is a zero license cost server virtualization and management solution that makes enterprise applications easier to deploy, manage, and support. Backed worldwide by affordable enterprise-quality support for both Oracle and non-Oracle environments, it reduces operations and support costs while increasing IT efficiency and agility.

Virtuozzo

Virtuozzo

It is an operating system-level server virtualization solution designed to centralize server management and consolidate workloads, which reduces overhead by reducing the number of physical servers required. Organizations use it for server consolidation, disaster recovery, and server workload agility.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana