PRTG vs Snort

Overview

PRTG

Stacks56

Followers66

Votes0

Snort

Stacks36

Followers104

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.1K

Forks640

PRTG vs Snort: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between PRTG and Snort, two popular network monitoring and security tools.

Deployment: PRTG is primarily a network monitoring tool that uses sensors to collect data and provide real-time network performance insights. On the other hand, Snort is an open-source intrusion detection and prevention system (IDS/IPS) that focuses on analyzing network traffic to detect and prevent security threats.
Focus: PRTG is designed to help monitor network performance, bandwidth usage, and availability of devices and applications. Snort, on the other hand, is specifically focused on identifying and responding to malicious activities within the network, such as cyber attacks or unauthorized access attempts.
Licensing: PRTG offers a commercial licensing model with different pricing tiers based on the number of sensors used for monitoring. In contrast, Snort is open-source software distributed under the GNU General Public License (GPL), making it free to use and modify by the community.
Alerting and Response: PRTG provides customizable alerts and notifications based on predefined thresholds or conditions to notify administrators of performance issues. Snort, on the other hand, generates alerts when it detects suspicious network activity and can automatically block or mitigate potential security threats.
Community Support and Updates: PRTG offers professional support and regular updates from the vendor, ensuring compatibility with the latest technologies and improving functionality. Snort benefits from a large community of users and developers who contribute to the continued development and enhancement of the software, providing access to a wealth of knowledge and resources.
Integration with other Tools: PRTG provides integration with various third-party tools and services to extend its monitoring capabilities, such as cloud services, databases, and other monitoring solutions. Snort can be integrated with other security tools, SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) systems, and threat intelligence feeds to enhance network security posture and response capabilities.

In Summary, the key differences between PRTG and Snort lie in their primary focus, deployment, licensing models, alerting and response mechanisms, community support, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

PRTG	Snort
It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.	It is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.
FLEXIBLE ALERTING; MULTIPLE USER INTERFACES; CLUSTER FAILOVER SOLUTION;	Intrusion Agent; IPSx; IPS; NGIPS; IPS detection and blocking
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 3.1K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 640
Stacks 56	Stacks 36
Followers 66	Followers 104
Votes 0	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Cons 1 Running on windows 1 Graphs are static 1 Poor search capabilities	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Grafana Slack	Windows FreeBSD CentOS Fedora

What are some alternatives to PRTG, Snort?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Riemann

Riemann aggregates events from your servers and applications with a powerful stream processing language. Send an email for every exception in your app. Track the latency distribution of your web app. See the top processes on any host, by memory and CPU.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Packetbeat

Packetbeat agents sniff the traffic between your application processes, parse on the fly protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Postgresql or REDIS and correlate the messages into transactions.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

PRTG vs Snort: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between PRTG and Snort, two popular network monitoring and security tools.

Deployment: PRTG is primarily a network monitoring tool that uses sensors to collect data and provide real-time network performance insights. On the other hand, Snort is an open-source intrusion detection and prevention system (IDS/IPS) that focuses on analyzing network traffic to detect and prevent security threats.
Focus: PRTG is designed to help monitor network performance, bandwidth usage, and availability of devices and applications. Snort, on the other hand, is specifically focused on identifying and responding to malicious activities within the network, such as cyber attacks or unauthorized access attempts.
Licensing: PRTG offers a commercial licensing model with different pricing tiers based on the number of sensors used for monitoring. In contrast, Snort is open-source software distributed under the GNU General Public License (GPL), making it free to use and modify by the community.
Alerting and Response: PRTG provides customizable alerts and notifications based on predefined thresholds or conditions to notify administrators of performance issues. Snort, on the other hand, generates alerts when it detects suspicious network activity and can automatically block or mitigate potential security threats.
Community Support and Updates: PRTG offers professional support and regular updates from the vendor, ensuring compatibility with the latest technologies and improving functionality. Snort benefits from a large community of users and developers who contribute to the continued development and enhancement of the software, providing access to a wealth of knowledge and resources.
Integration with other Tools: PRTG provides integration with various third-party tools and services to extend its monitoring capabilities, such as cloud services, databases, and other monitoring solutions. Snort can be integrated with other security tools, SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) systems, and threat intelligence feeds to enhance network security posture and response capabilities.

In Summary, the key differences between PRTG and Snort lie in their primary focus, deployment, licensing models, alerting and response mechanisms, community support, and integration capabilities.