StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Network Monitoring
  5. PRTG vs Wireshark

PRTG vs Wireshark

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PRTG
PRTG
Stacks56
Followers66
Votes0
Wireshark
Wireshark
Stacks95
Followers57
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.6K
Forks2.1K

PRTG vs Wireshark: What are the differences?

Key Differences between PRTG and Wireshark

PRTG (Paessler Router Traffic Grapher) and Wireshark are both popular network monitoring tools with different functionalities. The key differences between PRTG and Wireshark are as follows:

  1. Features: PRTG is a comprehensive network monitoring tool that offers a wide range of features such as bandwidth monitoring, device monitoring, application monitoring, and server monitoring. It is designed to provide real-time monitoring and alerting for network administrators. On the other hand, Wireshark is primarily a network protocol analyzer that captures and analyzes network traffic, allowing users to inspect packets and troubleshoot network issues.

  2. User Interface: PRTG provides a user-friendly and intuitive web-based interface that allows users to easily set up and configure monitoring sensors. It offers customizable dashboards and reports for monitoring network performance. In contrast, Wireshark has a more technical and complex user interface that requires a certain level of expertise to effectively use and interpret the captured network packets.

  3. Deployment: PRTG is a commercial solution that requires installation on a dedicated server or PC, and it supports both on-premises and cloud deployment. It can be accessed via a web browser from any device connected to the network. On the other hand, Wireshark is an open-source tool that can be installed on various operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. It can be deployed on individual machines without the need for a dedicated server.

  4. Scope: PRTG focuses on monitoring the overall network infrastructure, including devices, applications, and servers. It provides comprehensive visibility into the network, enabling proactive monitoring and troubleshooting. In contrast, Wireshark focuses more on capturing and analyzing network packets. It allows users to inspect individual packets, decode protocols, and analyze network traffic at a granular level.

  5. Data Collection: PRTG collects data by monitoring SNMP-enabled devices, using WMI or Windows performance counters, and utilizing various protocols such as NetFlow, sFlow, and Packet Sniffing. It provides real-time data collection and alerting for proactive network management. Wireshark, on the other hand, captures packets by sniffing network traffic on a specific interface or by analyzing packet capture files. It provides detailed packet-level information for troubleshooting and analysis purposes.

  6. Use Cases: PRTG is widely used in enterprise environments to monitor network performance, ensure network availability, and manage bandwidth usage. It is suitable for IT teams responsible for network administration, system monitoring, and capacity planning. Wireshark, on the other hand, is primarily used by network engineers and security professionals for network troubleshooting, protocol analysis, and network forensics.

In summary, PRTG is a comprehensive network monitoring tool with a wide range of features, while Wireshark is a packet analyzer tool that focuses on capturing and analyzing network traffic. PRTG provides real-time monitoring and alerting for network performance, while Wireshark offers more in-depth packet-level analysis for troubleshooting and security purposes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PRTG
PRTG
Wireshark
Wireshark

It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.

It is the world’s foremost and widely-used network protocol analyzer. It lets you see what’s happening on your network at a microscopic level and is the de facto standard across many commercial and non-profit enterprises, government agencies, and educational institutions.

FLEXIBLE ALERTING; MULTIPLE USER INTERFACES; CLUSTER FAILOVER SOLUTION;
Deep inspection of hundreds of protocols, with more being added all the time; Live capture and offline analysis; Standard three-pane packet browser; Multi-platform: Runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, Solaris, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and many others; Captured network data can be browsed via a GUI, or via the TTY-mode TShark utility
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
Stacks
56
Stacks
95
Followers
66
Followers
57
Votes
0
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Cons
  • 1
    Running on windows
  • 1
    Graphs are static
  • 1
    Poor search capabilities
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Grafana
Grafana
Slack
Slack
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Oracle Solaris
Oracle Solaris

What are some alternatives to PRTG, Wireshark?

Riemann

Riemann

Riemann aggregates events from your servers and applications with a powerful stream processing language. Send an email for every exception in your app. Track the latency distribution of your web app. See the top processes on any host, by memory and CPU.

Packetbeat

Packetbeat

Packetbeat agents sniff the traffic between your application processes, parse on the fly protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Postgresql or REDIS and correlate the messages into transactions.

Observium

Observium

It is a low-maintenance auto-discovering network monitoring platform supporting a wide range of device types, platforms and operating systems

Beats

Beats

Beats is the platform for single-purpose data shippers. They send data from hundreds or thousands of machines and systems to Logstash or Elasticsearch.

LibreNMS

LibreNMS

It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more.

Tailscale

Tailscale

It connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Create a secure network between your servers, computers, and cloud instances. Even when separated by firewalls or subnets, Tailscale just works. It makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

Nagios XI

Nagios XI

It is the most powerful and trusted network monitoring software on the market. It extends on proven, enterprise-class Open Source components to deliver the best network, server and application monitoring solution for today's demanding organizational requirements.

Snort

Snort

It is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.

Pi-hole

Pi-hole

It is a DNS sinkhole that protects your devices from unwanted content, without installing any client-side software. You can run it in a container, or deploy it directly to a supported operating system via our automated installer.

Cisco ISE

Cisco ISE

A critical component of any zero-trust strategy is securing the environment that everyone and everything is connecting to: the workplace. It enables a dynamic and automated approach to policy enforcement that empowers software-defined access and automated network segmentation within IT and OT environments.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana