Alternatives to Publii logo

Alternatives to Publii

Hugo, Jekyll, WordPress, Netlify, and Ghost are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Publii.
17
61
+ 1
3

What is Publii and what are its top alternatives?

Publii is a static website generator that allows users to create and manage websites without the need for technical knowledge. Key features include a user-friendly interface, fast performance, in-built SEO tools, multiple themes, and offline editing capabilities. Despite its ease of use, Publii may lack some advanced customization options for experienced users and may not be suitable for complex website projects.

  1. Hugo: Hugo is a popular static site generator known for its speed and flexibility. Key features include a fast build process, extensive theme library, and support for multiple content types. Pros of Hugo include its performance and large community, while cons may include a steeper learning curve for beginners.
  2. Jekyll: Jekyll is a simple static site generator that is easy to use and customize. Key features include built-in support for GitHub Pages, blogging capabilities, and a large plugin ecosystem. Pros of Jekyll include its simplicity and integration with GitHub, while cons may include slower build times for larger websites.
  3. Gatsby: Gatsby is a modern static site generator that uses React.js for building websites. Key features include performance optimization, built-in GraphQL support, and a wide range of plugins. Pros of Gatsby include its speed and flexibility, while cons may include a more complex setup process.
  4. Hexo: Hexo is a fast and simple static site generator built with Node.js. Key features include support for multiple languages, custom themes, and easy deployment options. Pros of Hexo include its speed and versatility, while cons may include limited out-of-the-box features compared to other generators.
  5. Pelican: Pelican is a static site generator written in Python that is easy to install and use. Key features include content written in Markdown or reStructuredText, theming support, and extensive documentation. Pros of Pelican include its simplicity and Python integration, while cons may include a smaller theme library compared to other generators.
  6. VuePress: VuePress is a static site generator powered by Vue.js that is ideal for documentation websites. Key features include Markdown support, built-in search functionality, and theming capabilities. Pros of VuePress include its ease of use and Vue.js integration, while cons may include a focus on documentation rather than general website building.
  7. MkDocs: MkDocs is a static site generator specifically designed for creating project documentation. Key features include Markdown support, theming options, and easy navigation between pages. Pros of MkDocs include its simplicity and focus on documentation, while cons may include limited customization for non-documentation websites.
  8. Gridsome: Gridsome is a Vue.js-based static site generator that combines static site generation with dynamic features. Key features include a GraphQL layer, fast build times, and plugin support. Pros of Gridsome include its performance and flexibility, while cons may include a more complex setup compared to traditional static site generators.
  9. Next.js: Next.js is a React-based static site generator that offers server-side rendering and static site generation. Key features include built-in routing, data fetching capabilities, and incremental static regeneration. Pros of Next.js include its flexibility and dynamic content options, while cons may include a steeper learning curve for beginners.
  10. 11ty: 11ty is a simple and flexible static site generator that allows users to work with multiple template languages. Key features include support for Markdown, Nunjucks, and other templating languages, as well as easy customization options. Pros of 11ty include its versatility and simplicity, while cons may include a smaller community compared to other generators.

Top Alternatives to Publii

  • Hugo
    Hugo

    Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data. ...

  • Jekyll
    Jekyll

    Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories. ...

  • WordPress
    WordPress

    The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family. ...

  • Netlify
    Netlify

    Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment. ...

  • Ghost
    Ghost

    Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do. ...

  • Grav
    Grav

    It is a free, open-source and self-hosted content management system (CMS) based on the PHP programming language and Symfony web application framework. It uses a flat file database for both backend and frontend. It is more widely used, and growing at a faster rate, than other leading flat-file CMS competitors. ...

  • Google AdSense
    Google AdSense

    It is a program run by Google through which website publishers in the Google Network of content sites serve text, images, video, or interactive media advertisements that are targeted to the site content and audience. ...

  • Mailchimp
    Mailchimp

    MailChimp helps you design email newsletters, share them on social networks, integrate with services you already use, and track your results. It's like your own personal publishing platform. ...

Publii alternatives & related posts

Hugo logo

Hugo

1.3K
206
A Fast and Flexible Static Site Generator written in Go
1.3K
206
PROS OF HUGO
  • 47
    Lightning fast
  • 29
    Single Executable
  • 26
    Easy setup
  • 24
    Great development community
  • 23
    Open source
  • 13
    Write in golang
  • 8
    Not HTML only - JSON, RSS
  • 8
    Hacker mindset
  • 7
    LiveReload built in
  • 4
    Gitlab pages integration
  • 4
    Easy to customize themes
  • 4
    Very fast builds
  • 3
    Well documented
  • 3
    Fast builds
  • 3
    Easy to learn
CONS OF HUGO
  • 4
    No Plugins/Extensions
  • 2
    Template syntax not friendly
  • 1
    Quick builds

related Hugo posts

John-Daniel Trask
Co-founder & CEO at Raygun · | 19 upvotes · 344.8K views
Shared insights
on
.NET.NETWordPressWordPressHugoHugo
at

There’s no doubt WordPress is a great CMS, which is very user friendly. When we started the company, our blog wasn’t really our top priority, and it ended up being hosted on a fairly obscure server within our setup, which didn’t really change much until recently when things become harder to manage and make significant updates.

As our marketing team increased, the amount of traffic that found us through our content marketing increased. We found ourselves struggling to maintain our Wordpress install given the amount of theme updates, plugins and security patches needing to be applied. Our biggest driver to find an alternative solution however was just how slow Wordpress is at serving content to the end user. I know there will be die hard fans out there with ways to set things up that mean WordPress sites can load quickly, but we needed something a lot more streamlined.

We could see in our own Real User Monitoring tool that many users were experiencing page load speeds of over five seconds, even longer in worst case scenarios. Hugo is an open source static site generator that has enabled us to reduce load times by over 500% and make our blog far more maintainable across the whole team.

The Raygun marketing site runs on a .NET CMS called N2 but we plan to swap that out with Hugo as well in future.

#StaticSiteGenerators #SelfHostedBloggingCms #SupportSalesAndMarketing

See more
Jan Vlnas
Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 6 upvotes · 65.6K views

Depends on what options and technologies you have available, and how do you deploy your website.

There are CMSs which update existing static pages through FTP: You provide access credentials, mark editable parts of your HTML in a markup, and then edit the content through the hosted CMS. I know two systems which work like that: Cushy CMS and Surreal CMS.

If the source of your site is versioned through Git (and hosted on GitHub), you have other options, like Netlify CMS, Spinal CMS, Siteleaf, Forestry, or CloudCannon. Some of these also need you to use static site generator (like 11ty, Jekyll, or Hugo).

If you have some server-side scripting support available (typically PHP) you can also consider some flat-file based, server-side systems, like Kirby CMS or Lektor, which are usually simpler to retrofit into an existing template than “traditional” CMSs (WordPress, Drupal).

Finally, you could also use a desktop-based static site generator which provides a user-friendly GUI, and then locally generates and uploads the website. For example Publii, YouDoCMS, Agit CMS.

See more
Jekyll logo

Jekyll

1.9K
230
Blog-aware, static site generator in Ruby
1.9K
230
PROS OF JEKYLL
  • 74
    Github pages integration
  • 54
    Open source
  • 37
    It's slick, customisable and hackerish
  • 24
    Easy to deploy
  • 23
    Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset
  • 7
    Gitlab pages integration
  • 5
    Best for blogging
  • 2
    Low maintenance
  • 2
    Easy to integrate localization
  • 1
    Huge plugins ecosystem
  • 1
    Authoring freedom and simplicity
CONS OF JEKYLL
  • 4
    Build time increases exponentially as site grows
  • 2
    Lack of developments lately
  • 1
    Og doesn't work with postings dynamically

related Jekyll posts

Dale Ross
Independent Contractor at Self Employed · | 22 upvotes · 1.7M views

I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

See more
Jan Vlnas
Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 6 upvotes · 65.6K views

Depends on what options and technologies you have available, and how do you deploy your website.

There are CMSs which update existing static pages through FTP: You provide access credentials, mark editable parts of your HTML in a markup, and then edit the content through the hosted CMS. I know two systems which work like that: Cushy CMS and Surreal CMS.

If the source of your site is versioned through Git (and hosted on GitHub), you have other options, like Netlify CMS, Spinal CMS, Siteleaf, Forestry, or CloudCannon. Some of these also need you to use static site generator (like 11ty, Jekyll, or Hugo).

If you have some server-side scripting support available (typically PHP) you can also consider some flat-file based, server-side systems, like Kirby CMS or Lektor, which are usually simpler to retrofit into an existing template than “traditional” CMSs (WordPress, Drupal).

Finally, you could also use a desktop-based static site generator which provides a user-friendly GUI, and then locally generates and uploads the website. For example Publii, YouDoCMS, Agit CMS.

See more
WordPress logo

WordPress

98.2K
2.1K
A semantic personal publishing platform with a focus on aesthetics, web standards, and usability.
98.2K
2.1K
PROS OF WORDPRESS
  • 416
    Customizable
  • 367
    Easy to manage
  • 354
    Plugins & themes
  • 259
    Non-tech colleagues can update website content
  • 247
    Really powerful
  • 145
    Rapid website development
  • 78
    Best documentation
  • 51
    Codex
  • 44
    Product feature set
  • 35
    Custom/internal social network
  • 18
    Open source
  • 8
    Great for all types of websites
  • 7
    Huge install and user base
  • 5
    I like it like I like a kick in the groin
  • 5
    It's simple and easy to use by any novice
  • 5
    Perfect example of user collaboration
  • 5
    Open Source Community
  • 5
    Most websites make use of it
  • 5
    Best
  • 4
    API-based CMS
  • 4
    Community
  • 3
    Easy To use
  • 2
    <a href="https://secure.wphackedhel">Easy Beginner</a>
CONS OF WORDPRESS
  • 13
    Hard to keep up-to-date if you customize things
  • 13
    Plugins are of mixed quality
  • 10
    Not best backend UI
  • 2
    Complex Organization
  • 1
    Do not cover all the basics in the core
  • 1
    Great Security

related WordPress posts

Dale Ross
Independent Contractor at Self Employed · | 22 upvotes · 1.7M views

I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

See more
Shared insights
on
ElementorElementorWordPressWordPress

hello guys, I need your help. I created a website, I've been using Elementor forever, but yesterday I bought a template after I made the purchase I knew I made a mistake, cause the template was in HTML, can anyone please show me how to put this HTML template in my WordPress so it will be the face of my website, thank you in advance.

See more
Netlify logo

Netlify

3.4K
206
Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys...
3.4K
206
PROS OF NETLIFY
  • 46
    Easy deploy
  • 43
    Fastest static hosting and continuous deployments
  • 22
    Free SSL support
  • 22
    Super simple deploys
  • 15
    Easy Setup and Continous deployments
  • 10
    Faster than any other option in the market
  • 10
    Free plan for personal websites
  • 8
    Deploy previews
  • 6
    Free Open Source (Pro) plan
  • 4
    Easy to use and great support
  • 4
    Analytics
  • 4
    Great loop-in material on a blog
  • 3
    Custom domains support
  • 3
    Fastest static hosting and continuous deployments
  • 3
    Great drag and drop functionality
  • 1
    Canary Releases (Split Tests)
  • 1
    Supports static site generators
  • 1
    Tech oriented support
  • 0
    Django
CONS OF NETLIFY
  • 7
    It's expensive
  • 1
    Bandwidth limitation

related Netlify posts

Johnny Bell

I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

See more
Jeyabalaji Subramanian

At FundsCorner, we are on a mission to enable fast accessible credit to India’s Kirana Stores. We are an early stage startup with an ultra small Engineering team. All the tech decisions we have made until now are based on our core philosophy: "Build usable products fast".

Based on the above fundamentals, we chose Python as our base language for all our APIs and micro-services. It is ultra easy to start with, yet provides great libraries even for the most complex of use cases. Our entire backend stack runs on Python and we cannot be more happy with it! If you are looking to deploy your API as server-less, Python provides one of the least cold start times.

We build our APIs with Flask. For backend database, our natural choice was MongoDB. It frees up our time from complex database specifications - we instead use our time in doing sensible data modelling & once we finalize the data model, we integrate it into Flask using Swagger UI. Mongo supports complex queries to cull out difficult data through aggregation framework & we have even built an internal framework called "Poetry", for aggregation queries.

Our web apps are built on Vue.js , Vuetify and vuex. Initially we debated a lot around choosing Vue.js or React , but finally settled with Vue.js, mainly because of the ease of use, fast development cycles & awesome set of libraries and utilities backing Vue.

You simply cannot go wrong with Vue.js . Great documentation, the library is ultra compact & is blazing fast. Choosing Vue.js was one of the critical decisions made, which enabled us to launch our web app in under a month (which otherwise would have taken 3 months easily). For those folks who are looking for big names, Adobe, and Alibaba and Gitlab are using Vue.

By choosing Vuetify, we saved thousands of person hours in designing the CSS files. Vuetify contains all key material components for designing a smooth User experience & it just works! It's an awesome framework. All of us at FundsCorner are now lifelong fanboys of Vue.js and Vuetify.

On the infrastructure side, all our API services and backend services are deployed as server less micro-services through Zappa. Zappa makes your life super easy by packaging everything that is required to deploy your code as AWS Lambda. We are now addicted to the single - click deploys / updates through Zappa. Try it out & you will convert!

Also, if you are using Zappa, you can greatly simplify your CI / CD pipelines. Do try it! It's just awesome! and... you will be astonished by the savings you have made on AWS bills at end of the month.

Our CI / CD pipelines are built using GitLab CI. The documentation is very good & it enables you to go from from concept to production in minimal time frame.

We use Sentry for all crash reporting and resolution. Pro tip, they do have handlers for AWS Lambda , which made our integration super easy.

All our micro-services including APIs are event-driven. Our background micro-services are message oriented & we use Amazon SQS as our message pipe. We have our own in-house workflow manager to orchestrate across micro - services.

We host our static websites on Netlify. One of the cool things about Netlify is the automated CI / CD on git push. You just do a git push to deploy! Again, it is super simple to use and it just works. We were dogmatic about going server less even on static web sites & you can go server less on Netlify in a few minutes. It's just a few clicks away.

We use Google Compute Engine, especially Google Vision for our AI experiments.

For Ops automation, we use Slack. Slack provides a super-rich API (through Slack App) through which you can weave magical automation on boring ops tasks.

See more
Ghost logo

Ghost

511
219
Just a blogging platform
511
219
PROS OF GHOST
  • 45
    Beautiful
  • 35
    Fast
  • 29
    Quick/simple post styling
  • 20
    Live Post Preview
  • 20
    Open source
  • 19
    Non-profit
  • 16
    Seamless writing
  • 6
    Node.js
  • 5
    Fast and Performatic
  • 5
    Javascript
  • 4
    Simplest
  • 3
    Wonderful UI
  • 3
    Handlebars
  • 3
    Full Control
  • 2
    Magic
  • 2
    Clean
  • 1
    Headless CMS
  • 1
    Self-hostable
CONS OF GHOST
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Ghost posts

    Grav logo

    Grav

    113
    16
    A modern open source flat-file CMS
    113
    16
    PROS OF GRAV
    • 4
      Easy to Update
    • 3
      No Databases
    • 2
      Fast Performance
    • 2
      Extensive Plugins
    • 2
      Strong Security
    • 2
      Full Control over customisation + functionality
    • 1
      Ligth storage use
    CONS OF GRAV
    • 2
      Not easily to intergrate as an eCommerce (yet)

    related Grav posts

    Google AdSense logo

    Google AdSense

    24.1K
    0
    A program that allows bloggers and website owners to make money by displaying Google ads
    24.1K
    0
    PROS OF GOOGLE ADSENSE
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF GOOGLE ADSENSE
      • 1
        Plenty installs but low on actual users

      related Google AdSense posts

      Shared insights
      on
      Google AdSenseGoogle AdSensePurpleAdsPurpleAds

      which of the ads platform pays better? What about PurpleAds?

      Google AdSense has refused to post ads on my site.

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      TaboolaTaboolaGoogle AdSenseGoogle AdSense

      Really can not decide which one to add. Google AdSense email say that they are ready to show ads... Taboola is on review.

      See more
      Mailchimp logo

      Mailchimp

      22.8K
      1.2K
      Easy email newsletters
      22.8K
      1.2K
      PROS OF MAILCHIMP
      • 259
        Smooth setup & ui
      • 248
        Mailing list
      • 148
        Robust e-mail creation
      • 120
        Integrates with a lot of external services
      • 109
        Custom templates
      • 59
        Free tier
      • 49
        Great api
      • 42
        Great UI
      • 33
        A/B Testing Subject Lines
      • 30
        Broad feature set
      • 11
        Subscriber Analytics
      • 9
        Great interface. The standard for email marketing
      • 8
        Great documentation
      • 8
        Mandrill integration
      • 7
        Segmentation
      • 6
        Best deliverability; helps you be the good guy
      • 5
        Facebook Integration
      • 5
        Autoresponders
      • 3
        Customization
      • 3
        RSS-to-email
      • 3
        Co-branding
      • 3
        Embedded signup forms
      • 2
        Automation
      • 1
        Great logo
      • 1
        Groups
      • 0
        Landing pages
      CONS OF MAILCHIMP
      • 2
        Super expensive
      • 1
        Poor API
      • 1
        Charged based on subscribers as opposed to emails sent

      related Mailchimp posts

      Kirill Shirinkin
      Cloud and DevOps Consultant at mkdev · | 12 upvotes · 707K views

      As a small startup we are very conscious about picking up the tools we use to run the project. After suffering with a mess of using at the same time Trello , Slack , Telegram and what not, we arrived at a small set of tools that cover all our current needs. For product management, file sharing, team communication etc we chose Basecamp and couldn't be more happy about it. For Customer Support and Sales Intercom works amazingly well. We are using MailChimp for email marketing since over 4 years and it still covers all our needs. Then on payment side combination of Stripe and Octobat helps us to process all the payments and generate compliant invoices. On techie side we use Rollbar and GitLab (for both code and CI). For corporate email we picked G Suite. That all costs us in total around 300$ a month, which is quite okay.

      See more
      Spenser Coke
      Product Engineer at Loanlink.de · | 9 upvotes · 308.2K views

      When starting a new company and building a new product w/ limited engineering we chose to optimize for expertise and rapid development, landing on Rails API, w/ AngularJS on the front.

      The reality is that we're building a CRUD app, so we considered going w/ vanilla Rails MVC to optimize velocity early on (it may not be sexy, but it gets the job done). Instead, we opted to split the codebase to allow for a richer front-end experience, focus on skill specificity when hiring, and give us the flexibility to be consumed by multiple clients in the future.

      We also considered .NET core or Node.js for the API layer, and React on the front-end, but our experiences dealing with mature Node APIs and the rapid-fire changes that comes with state management in React-land put us off, given our level of experience with those tools.

      We're using GitHub and Trello to track issues and projects, and a plethora of other tools to help the operational team, like Zapier, MailChimp, Google Drive with some basic Vue.js & HTML5 apps for smaller internal-facing web projects.

      See more