Alternatives to Pyramid logo

Alternatives to Pyramid

Django, Prism, Node.js, ASP.NET, and Rails are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Pyramid.
27
14
+ 1
0

What is Pyramid and what are its top alternatives?

It makes it easy to write web applications. You can start small with this "hello world" minimal request/response web app. This may take you far, especially while learning. As your application grows, it offers many features that make writing complex software take less effort.
Pyramid is a tool in the Frameworks (Full Stack) category of a tech stack.

Pyramid alternatives & related posts

Django logo

Django

7.7K
5.5K
2.8K
7.7K
5.5K
+ 1
2.8K
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
Django logo
Django
VS
Pyramid logo
Pyramid

related Django posts

Dmitry Mukhin
Dmitry Mukhin
at Uploadcare · | 22 upvotes · 196.9K views
atUploadcareUploadcare
PostCSS
PostCSS
Preact
Preact
Ember.js
Ember.js
React
React
Python
Python
Django
Django

Simple controls over complex technologies, as we put it, wouldn't be possible without neat UIs for our user areas including start page, dashboard, settings, and docs.

Initially, there was Django. Back in 2011, considering our Python-centric approach, that was the best choice. Later, we realized we needed to iterate on our website more quickly. And this led us to detaching Django from our front end. That was when we decided to build an SPA.

For building user interfaces, we're currently using React as it provided the fastest rendering back when we were building our toolkit. It’s worth mentioning Uploadcare is not a front-end-focused SPA: we aren’t running at high levels of complexity. If it were, we’d go with Ember.js.

However, there's a chance we will shift to the faster Preact, with its motto of using as little code as possible, and because it makes more use of browser APIs. One of our future tasks for our front end is to configure our Webpack bundler to split up the code for different site sections. For styles, we use PostCSS along with its plugins such as cssnano which minifies all the code.

All that allows us to provide a great user experience and quickly implement changes where they are needed with as little code as possible.

See more
Python
Python
Django
Django
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js

Django or NodeJS? Hi, I’m thinking about which software I should use for my web-app. What about Node.js or Django for the back-end? I want to create an online preparation course for the final school exams in my country. At the beginning for maths. The course should contain tutorials and a lot of exercises of different types. E.g. multiple choice, user text/number input and drawing tasks. The exercises should change (different levels) with the learning progress. Wrong questions should asked again with different numbers. I also want a score system and statistics. So far, I have got only limited web development skills. (some HTML, CSS, Bootstrap and Wordpress). I don’t know JavaScript or Python.

Possible pros for Python / Django: - easy syntax, easier to learn for me as a beginner - fast development, earlier release - libraries for mathematical and scientific computation

Possible pros for JavaScript / Node.js: - great performance, better choice for real time applications: user should get the answer for a question quickly

Which software would you use in my case? Are my arguments for Python/NodeJS right? Which kind of database would you use?

Thank you for your answer!

Node.js JavaScript Django Python

See more
Prism logo

Prism

496
4
0
496
4
+ 1
0
An extensible syntax highlighter, built with modern web standards
    Be the first to leave a pro
    Prism logo
    Prism
    VS
    Pyramid logo
    Pyramid
    Node.js logo

    Node.js

    29.7K
    23.7K
    7.9K
    29.7K
    23.7K
    + 1
    7.9K
    A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
    Node.js logo
    Node.js
    VS
    Pyramid logo
    Pyramid

    related Node.js posts

    Nick Parsons
    Nick Parsons
    Director of Developer Marketing at Stream · | 33 upvotes · 213.2K views
    atStreamStream
    Go
    Go
    Stream
    Stream
    Python
    Python
    Yarn
    Yarn
    Babel
    Babel
    Node.js
    Node.js
    ES6
    ES6
    JavaScript
    JavaScript
    #Languages
    #FrameworksFullStack

    Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

    We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

    We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

    Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

    #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

    See more
    Nick Rockwell
    Nick Rockwell
    CTO at NY Times · | 27 upvotes · 313.6K views
    atThe New York TimesThe New York Times
    Apache HTTP Server
    Apache HTTP Server
    Kafka
    Kafka
    Node.js
    Node.js
    GraphQL
    GraphQL
    Apollo
    Apollo
    React
    React
    PHP
    PHP
    MySQL
    MySQL

    When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

    So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

    React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

    Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

    See more
    ASP.NET logo

    ASP.NET

    12.9K
    292
    0
    12.9K
    292
    + 1
    0
    An open source web framework for building modern web apps and services with .NET
      Be the first to leave a pro
      ASP.NET logo
      ASP.NET
      VS
      Pyramid logo
      Pyramid

      related ASP.NET posts

      Greg Neumann
      Greg Neumann
      Indie, Solo, Developer · | 6 upvotes · 64.2K views
      TypeScript
      TypeScript
      Vue.js
      Vue.js
      Electron
      Electron
      Quasar Framework
      Quasar Framework
      ASP.NET
      ASP.NET
      Xamarin Forms
      Xamarin Forms
      .NET Core
      .NET Core
      Xamarin
      Xamarin

      Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

      This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

      But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

      I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

      Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

      See more
      ASP.NET
      ASP.NET
      Puppeteer
      Puppeteer
      vuex
      vuex
      ExpressJS
      ExpressJS
      React
      React
      Angular 2
      Angular 2
      Vue.js
      Vue.js
      Netlify
      Netlify
      Heroku
      Heroku
      #Seo
      #Heroku

      I found Heroku to be a great option to get ExpressJS up and running with very little hustle. The free tier is great, but I'd recommend to set up a cronjob to visit your site every few minutes so that the server stays awake. Netlify was the option to host the front-end because doing the server side rendering on #Heroku would have taken a little more time than I'd like to. For the moment pre-rendering the app with prerender-spa-plugin is enough to help with #seo. Puppeteer was my choice over other options because it made it easier to scrape websites made on ASP.NET which is what I needed in this case. And Vue.js is my top choice at the moment because it's really beginner friendly and it has a lot of the features I like about Angular 2 and React. vuex is a must in most of the app I build.

      See more
      Rails logo

      Rails

      8.6K
      5.2K
      5.3K
      8.6K
      5.2K
      + 1
      5.3K
      Web development that doesn't hurt
      Rails logo
      Rails
      VS
      Pyramid logo
      Pyramid

      related Rails posts

      Zach Holman
      Zach Holman
      at Zach Holman · | 23 upvotes · 189.3K views
      JavaScript
      JavaScript
      Rails
      Rails
      Apollo
      Apollo
      React
      React

      Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

      But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

      But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

      Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

      See more
      Russel Werner
      Russel Werner
      Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 17 upvotes · 195.7K views
      atStackShareStackShare
      Redis
      Redis
      CircleCI
      CircleCI
      Webpack
      Webpack
      Amazon CloudFront
      Amazon CloudFront
      Amazon S3
      Amazon S3
      GitHub
      GitHub
      Heroku
      Heroku
      Rails
      Rails
      Node.js
      Node.js
      Apollo
      Apollo
      Glamorous
      Glamorous
      React
      React
      #FrontEndRepoSplit
      #Microservices
      #SSR
      #StackDecisionsLaunch

      StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

      Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

      #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

      See more

      related Laravel posts

      Epistol
      Epistol
      PHP
      PHP
      Bulma
      Bulma
      Asana
      Asana
      Stripe
      Stripe
      Let's Encrypt
      Let's Encrypt
      CloudFlare
      CloudFlare
      Deployer
      Deployer
      Git
      Git
      GitHub
      GitHub
      Ubuntu
      Ubuntu
      nginx
      nginx
      Buddy
      Buddy
      Webpack
      Webpack
      Vue.js
      Vue.js
      JavaScript
      JavaScript
      HTML5
      HTML5
      Sass
      Sass
      Google Analytics
      Google Analytics
      PhpStorm
      PhpStorm
      Laravel
      Laravel
      #CDG
      CDG

      I use Laravel because it's the most advances PHP framework out there, easy to maintain, easy to upgrade and most of all : easy to get a handle on, and to follow every new technology ! PhpStorm is our main software to code, as of simplicity and full range of tools for a modern application.

      Google Analytics Analytics of course for a tailored analytics, Bulma as an innovative CSS framework, coupled with our Sass (Scss) pre-processor.

      As of more basic stuff, we use HTML5, JavaScript (but with Vue.js too) and Webpack to handle the generation of all this.

      To deploy, we set up Buddy to easily send the updates on our nginx / Ubuntu server, where it will connect to our GitHub Git private repository, pull and do all the operations needed with Deployer .

      CloudFlare ensure the rapidity of distribution of our content, and Let's Encrypt the https certificate that is more than necessary when we'll want to sell some products with our Stripe api calls.

      Asana is here to let us list all the functionalities, possibilities and ideas we want to implement.

      See more
      Antonio Sanchez
      Antonio Sanchez
      CEO at Kokoen GmbH · | 11 upvotes · 84.2K views
      atKokoen GmbHKokoen GmbH
      ExpressJS
      ExpressJS
      Node.js
      Node.js
      JavaScript
      JavaScript
      MongoDB
      MongoDB
      Go
      Go
      MySQL
      MySQL
      Laravel
      Laravel
      PHP
      PHP

      Back at the start of 2017, we decided to create a web-based tool for the SEO OnPage analysis of our clients' websites. We had over 2.000 websites to analyze, so we had to perform thousands of requests to get every single page from those websites, process the information and save the big amounts of data somewhere.

      Very soon we realized that the initial chosen script language and database, PHP, Laravel and MySQL, was not going to be able to cope efficiently with such a task.

      By that time, we were doing some experiments for other projects with a language we had recently get to know, Go , so we decided to get a try and code the crawler using it. It was fantastic, we could process much more data with way less CPU power and in less time. By using the concurrency abilites that the language has to offers, we could also do more Http requests in less time.

      Unfortunately, I have no comparison numbers to show about the performance differences between Go and PHP since the difference was so clear from the beginning and that we didn't feel the need to do further comparison tests nor document it. We just switched fully to Go.

      There was still a problem: despite the big amount of Data we were generating, MySQL was performing very well, but as we were adding more and more features to the software and with those features more and more different type of data to save, it was a nightmare for the database architects to structure everything correctly on the database, so it was clear what we had to do next: switch to a NoSQL database. So we switched to MongoDB, and it was also fantastic: we were expending almost zero time in thinking how to structure the Database and the performance also seemed to be better, but again, I have no comparison numbers to show due to the lack of time.

      We also decided to switch the website from PHP and Laravel to JavaScript and Node.js and ExpressJS since working with the JSON Data that we were saving now in the Database would be easier.

      As of now, we don't only use the tool intern but we also opened it for everyone to use for free: https://tool-seo.com

      See more
      Android SDK logo

      Android SDK

      7.1K
      5.1K
      774
      7.1K
      5.1K
      + 1
      774
      An SDK that provides you the API libraries and developer tools necessary to build, test, and debug apps...