StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Development & Training Tools
  4. Data Science Tools
  5. PySpark vs SciPy

PySpark vs SciPy

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SciPy
SciPy
Stacks1.5K
Followers180
Votes0
GitHub Stars14.2K
Forks5.5K
PySpark
PySpark
Stacks490
Followers295
Votes0

PySpark vs SciPy: What are the differences?

Key differences between PySpark and SciPy

PySpark and SciPy are two popular frameworks used in data analysis and processing. While both frameworks have similarities, they also have several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Scalability and Distributed Computing: The main difference between PySpark and SciPy is their approach to distributed computing. PySpark, built on top of Apache Spark, is specifically designed to handle big data processing and distributed computing. It offers in-memory processing capabilities, making it highly scalable and suitable for large-scale data analysis. On the other hand, SciPy is primarily focused on scientific computing and numerical analysis, and it does not provide built-in support for distributed computing like PySpark.

  2. Data Processing: Another significant difference between PySpark and SciPy is their primary focus on data processing. PySpark offers a wide range of built-in tools and libraries for various data processing tasks, such as ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) operations, data cleaning, data manipulation, and machine learning. It provides a convenient and unified interface for processing data using Spark's DataFrame API. In contrast, SciPy's main focus is on scientific computing tasks, such as numerical integration, optimization, linear algebra, signal processing, and statistics. It provides a comprehensive set of functions and algorithms for these scientific computations but does not have the extensive data processing capabilities of PySpark.

  3. Integration with Python Ecosystem: PySpark and SciPy also differ in their integration with the broader Python ecosystem. PySpark is seamlessly integrated with the Python programming language and leverages its rich ecosystem of libraries and tools. This integration allows users to combine PySpark's distributed computing capabilities with other Python libraries for tasks such as data visualization (e.g., Matplotlib), machine learning (e.g., scikit-learn), and deep learning (e.g., TensorFlow). On the other hand, SciPy is part of the wider SciPy ecosystem, which includes libraries like NumPy, Matplotlib, and Pandas. These libraries provide a comprehensive suite of tools for scientific computing and data analysis, and SciPy seamlessly integrates with them to perform complex scientific computations.

  4. Ease of Use: PySpark and SciPy also differ in terms of ease of use, especially for beginners. PySpark's DataFrame API provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface for applying transformations and operations on structured data, making it relatively easy for new users to start working with big data. Additionally, PySpark's extensive documentation and community support make it easier for users to find resources and get help when needed. On the other hand, SciPy has a steeper learning curve, especially for users who are new to scientific computing. It requires a good understanding of numerical analysis and mathematical concepts to effectively utilize its capabilities.

  5. Speed and Performance: When it comes to performance, PySpark and SciPy have different strengths. PySpark's distributed computing capabilities allow it to handle large-scale datasets more efficiently, making it suitable for big data processing. It can leverage the power of distributed computing clusters to parallelize computations and perform operations in-memory, resulting in faster processing times. On the other hand, SciPy's focused approach to scientific computing allows it to optimize specific algorithms and functions for performance. It utilizes highly optimized numerical libraries, such as BLAS and LAPACK, to achieve fast execution speeds for scientific computations.

  6. Industry Adoption: Finally, PySpark and SciPy also differ in terms of industry adoption and use cases. PySpark's focus on big data processing and distributed computing has made it popular in industries dealing with large-scale data analysis, such as finance, telecommunications, and healthcare. It is widely used for batch processing, real-time analytics, machine learning, and graph processing applications. On the other hand, SciPy's focus on scientific computing has made it popular in research fields, academic institutions, and engineering domains. It is widely used for tasks such as numerical simulation, data visualization, image processing, and statistical analysis.

In summary, PySpark and SciPy differ in terms of scalability and distributed computing capabilities, primary focus on data processing or scientific computing, integration with the Python ecosystem, ease of use, speed and performance, and industry adoption.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SciPy
SciPy
PySpark
PySpark

Python-based ecosystem of open-source software for mathematics, science, and engineering. It contains modules for optimization, linear algebra, integration, interpolation, special functions, FFT, signal and image processing, ODE solvers and other tasks common in science and engineering.

It is the collaboration of Apache Spark and Python. it is a Python API for Spark that lets you harness the simplicity of Python and the power of Apache Spark in order to tame Big Data.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
14.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.5K
Stacks
490
Followers
180
Followers
295
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to SciPy, PySpark?

Pandas

Pandas

Flexible and powerful data analysis / manipulation library for Python, providing labeled data structures similar to R data.frame objects, statistical functions, and much more.

NumPy

NumPy

Besides its obvious scientific uses, NumPy can also be used as an efficient multi-dimensional container of generic data. Arbitrary data-types can be defined. This allows NumPy to seamlessly and speedily integrate with a wide variety of databases.

PyXLL

PyXLL

Integrate Python into Microsoft Excel. Use Excel as your user-facing front-end with calculations, business logic and data access powered by Python. Works with all 3rd party and open source Python packages. No need to write any VBA!

Dataform

Dataform

Dataform helps you manage all data processes in your cloud data warehouse. Publish tables, write data tests and automate complex SQL workflows in a few minutes, so you can spend more time on analytics and less time managing infrastructure.

Anaconda

Anaconda

A free and open-source distribution of the Python and R programming languages for scientific computing, that aims to simplify package management and deployment. Package versions are managed by the package management system conda.

Dask

Dask

It is a versatile tool that supports a variety of workloads. It is composed of two parts: Dynamic task scheduling optimized for computation. This is similar to Airflow, Luigi, Celery, or Make, but optimized for interactive computational workloads. Big Data collections like parallel arrays, dataframes, and lists that extend common interfaces like NumPy, Pandas, or Python iterators to larger-than-memory or distributed environments. These parallel collections run on top of dynamic task schedulers.

Pentaho Data Integration

Pentaho Data Integration

It enable users to ingest, blend, cleanse and prepare diverse data from any source. With visual tools to eliminate coding and complexity, It puts the best quality data at the fingertips of IT and the business.

KNIME

KNIME

It is a free and open-source data analytics, reporting and integration platform. KNIME integrates various components for machine learning and data mining through its modular data pipelining concept.

StreamSets

StreamSets

An end-to-end data integration platform to build, run, monitor and manage smart data pipelines that deliver continuous data for DataOps.

Denodo

Denodo

It is the leader in data virtualization providing data access, data governance and data delivery capabilities across the broadest range of enterprise, cloud, big data, and unstructured data sources without moving the data from their original repositories.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase