Quarkus vs Ratpack

Overview

Ratpack

Stacks14

Followers22

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.9K

Forks402

Quarkus

Stacks312

Followers382

Votes80

GitHub Stars15.2K

Forks3.0K

Quarkus vs Ratpack: What are the differences?

Runtime Containerization: Quarkus utilizes GraalVM and native image compilation to produce standalone executable binaries, which are highly optimized in terms of startup time and memory consumption. In contrast, Ratpack is built on top of JVM, requiring the runtime environment to be present for execution, resulting in slightly slower startup times and higher memory consumption.
Development Model: Quarkus adopts a convention over configuration approach, providing a set of defaults and opinions to streamline development. On the other hand, Ratpack follows a more flexible and customizable development model, allowing developers to configure application components according to their specific requirements, albeit at the cost of additional configuration overhead.
Performance: Quarkus is designed to deliver superior performance by minimizing overhead and maximizing efficiency through features like compile-time optimizations and native image generation. Ratpack, while fast in its asynchronous operations, may exhibit comparatively higher response times due to its reliance on the JVM for runtime execution.
Community Support: Quarkus has gained significant traction and community backing due to its alignment with modern cloud-native principles and technologies, leading to a robust ecosystem of extensions, libraries, and community-driven support. Ratpack, while well-established, may not enjoy the same level of community support and momentum as Quarkus.
Ecosystem Integration: Quarkus seamlessly integrates with popular Java frameworks and libraries, enabling developers to leverage existing ecosystem components without significant modifications. Ratpack, while extensible, may require additional effort for integration with third-party libraries and frameworks due to its unique design and architecture.
Project Maturity and Stability: Quarkus, being a relatively newer project, continues to evolve rapidly with frequent updates and improvements, introducing cutting-edge features and enhancements. Ratpack, as a more mature project, offers stability and reliability but may lag behind in terms of adopting the latest technologies and trends in the Java ecosystem.

In Summary, Quarkus and Ratpack differ in runtime containerization, development model, performance, community support, ecosystem integration, and project maturity, influencing their suitability for various use cases in modern Java application development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ratpack	Quarkus
It is a set of Java libraries for building scalable HTTP applications. It is a lean and powerful foundation. Its apps are lightweight, fast, composable with other tools and libraries, easy to test and enjoyable to develop.	It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.
Lean & powerful HTTP apps; toolkit for creating high performance web applications;	CONTAINER FIRST; UNIFIES IMPERATIVE AND REACTIVE; BEST OF BREED LIBRARIES AND STANDARDS
Statistics
GitHub Stars 1.9K	GitHub Stars 15.2K
GitHub Forks 402	GitHub Forks 3.0K
Stacks 14	Stacks 312
Followers 22	Followers 382
Votes 0	Votes 80
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 13 Open source 13 Fast startup 12 Low memory footprint 11 Produce native code 10 Hot Reload Cons 2 Boilerplate code when using Reflection
Integrations
Spring Boot Hystrix Guice	Kubernetes Apache Camel Hibernate Netty

What are some alternatives to Ratpack, Quarkus?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Quarkus vs Ratpack: What are the differences?

Runtime Containerization: Quarkus utilizes GraalVM and native image compilation to produce standalone executable binaries, which are highly optimized in terms of startup time and memory consumption. In contrast, Ratpack is built on top of JVM, requiring the runtime environment to be present for execution, resulting in slightly slower startup times and higher memory consumption.
Development Model: Quarkus adopts a convention over configuration approach, providing a set of defaults and opinions to streamline development. On the other hand, Ratpack follows a more flexible and customizable development model, allowing developers to configure application components according to their specific requirements, albeit at the cost of additional configuration overhead.
Performance: Quarkus is designed to deliver superior performance by minimizing overhead and maximizing efficiency through features like compile-time optimizations and native image generation. Ratpack, while fast in its asynchronous operations, may exhibit comparatively higher response times due to its reliance on the JVM for runtime execution.
Community Support: Quarkus has gained significant traction and community backing due to its alignment with modern cloud-native principles and technologies, leading to a robust ecosystem of extensions, libraries, and community-driven support. Ratpack, while well-established, may not enjoy the same level of community support and momentum as Quarkus.
Ecosystem Integration: Quarkus seamlessly integrates with popular Java frameworks and libraries, enabling developers to leverage existing ecosystem components without significant modifications. Ratpack, while extensible, may require additional effort for integration with third-party libraries and frameworks due to its unique design and architecture.
Project Maturity and Stability: Quarkus, being a relatively newer project, continues to evolve rapidly with frequent updates and improvements, introducing cutting-edge features and enhancements. Ratpack, as a more mature project, offers stability and reliability but may lag behind in terms of adopting the latest technologies and trends in the Java ecosystem.

Quarkus vs Ratpack

Overview