StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. React Engine vs Yoga

React Engine vs Yoga

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React Engine
React Engine
Stacks5
Followers11
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.4K
Forks129
Yoga
Yoga
Stacks77
Followers45
Votes5
GitHub Stars18.4K
Forks1.5K

React Engine vs Yoga: What are the differences?

Introduction

React Engine and Yoga are both open-source libraries developed by Facebook for building user interfaces. While React Engine focuses on server-side rendering of React applications, Yoga is a layout engine that helps in positioning and sizing UI components.

Key Differences between React Engine and Yoga

  1. Rendering React Applications: React Engine is specifically designed for server-side rendering (SSR) of React applications. It provides a thin React-like API that allows developers to render their React components on the server and send the generated HTML to the client. On the other hand, Yoga is a cross-platform layout engine that handles layout computation, allowing developers to position and size UI components consistently across different platforms.

  2. API and Functionality: React Engine mainly focuses on rendering React components on the server, providing an API that closely resembles the regular React API. It includes a set of components, lifecycle methods, and server-side rendering utilities. In contrast, Yoga focuses solely on layout computation and does not include React-specific functionality. It provides an API to define layout constraints and computes the position and size of UI components accordingly.

  3. Target Audience and Use Cases: React Engine is primarily targeted at developers who want to perform server-side rendering for their React applications. It is commonly used in scenarios where the initial render of the application needs to be performed on the server, such as improving the performance of content delivery, search engine optimization (SEO), or providing a better user experience for low-bandwidth users. On the other hand, Yoga is targeted at developers who want a cross-platform layout engine to handle UI component positioning and sizing. It can be used in various UI frameworks or applications to ensure consistent layout behavior across different platforms and screen sizes.

  4. Dependencies: React Engine has a dependency on the React library, as it is specifically designed to work with React components. It requires the React library to render the components and generate the HTML output. In contrast, Yoga is a standalone library that does not have any dependencies on specific UI frameworks or libraries. It can be used independently or integrated with different UI frameworks based on the project requirements.

  5. Focus on Performance: React Engine includes optimizations specifically tailored for server-side rendering, such as asynchronous rendering, streaming, and caching of the generated HTML. These optimizations aim to improve the performance of server-side rendering and reduce the time required to generate the initial HTML response. On the other hand, Yoga focuses on efficient layout computation by using a constraint-solving algorithm to calculate the best possible layout based on the defined constraints. It aims to provide fast and accurate layout computation for UI components.

  6. Community and Support: React Engine is a part of the larger React ecosystem, which has a vibrant community and extensive community support. Developers can benefit from the wealth of resources, tutorials, and community-driven libraries available for React. Yoga also has a community around it, but it is relatively smaller compared to the React community. However, being an open-source library, both React Engine and Yoga have active development and receive updates from their respective maintainers.

In summary, React Engine is primarily focused on server-side rendering of React applications, providing an API and optimizations for efficient rendering on the server. On the other hand, Yoga is a layout engine targeted at handling UI component positioning and sizing, offering a cross-platform approach to ensure consistent layout behavior.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

React Engine
React Engine
Yoga
Yoga

a composite render engine for universal (isomorphic) express apps to render both plain react views and react-router views

Yoga is a cross-platform layout engine which implements Flexbox. Yoga enables maximum collaboration within your team by implementing an API familiar to many designers and opening it up to developers across different platforms.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.4K
GitHub Stars
18.4K
GitHub Forks
129
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
5
Stacks
77
Followers
11
Followers
45
Votes
0
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 5
    Jhgjhgjhgjgjhghjg
  • 0
    5wyrtbagbnargnargnargn
Integrations
React
React
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to React Engine, Yoga?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase