StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. T3 vs redux-query

T3 vs redux-query

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

T3
T3
Stacks28
Followers39
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.5K
Forks145
redux-query
redux-query
Stacks6
Followers15
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.1K
Forks67

T3 vs redux-query: What are the differences?

  1. Key difference 1: State Management approach - T3 follows a traditional state management approach, where the application state is managed through actions, reducers, and selectors. On the other hand, redux-query is a more declarative approach to state management, where the application state is managed through queries and mutations.
  2. Key difference 2: Data fetching and caching - T3 does not provide built-in support for data fetching and caching. Developers have to handle data fetching using middleware or libraries such as axios. In contrast, redux-query provides a comprehensive data fetching and caching system out of the box, making it easier to handle complex data fetching scenarios.
  3. Key difference 3: Normalization - T3 does not perform data normalization by default. Developers have to manually normalize the data fetched from the server to ensure consistency and efficient updates. However, redux-query automatically normalizes the fetched data, reducing redundancy and improving performance when updating the state.
  4. Key difference 4: Configuration and setup - T3 requires developers to set up action types, reducers, and selectors manually, which can be time-consuming and error-prone. On the other hand, redux-query simplifies the configuration and setup process by providing a clear and concise API for defining queries, mutations, and selectors.
  5. Key difference 5: Error handling - T3 requires developers to manually handle errors and update the state accordingly. In contrast, redux-query provides built-in error handling mechanisms, making it easier to handle error scenarios and update the state accordingly.
  6. Key difference 6: Integration with Redux ecosystem - T3 integrates seamlessly with the Redux ecosystem, allowing developers to leverage existing Redux middleware, tools, and extensions. On the other hand, redux-query provides its own middleware and extensions, offering a more specialized and focused approach to state management.

In summary, T3 and redux-query differ in their state management approach, data fetching and caching capabilities, normalization support, configuration and setup process, error handling mechanisms, and integration with the Redux ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

T3
T3
redux-query
redux-query

T3 is different than most JavaScript frameworks. It's meant to be a small piece of an overall architecture that allows you to build scalable client-side code. T3 is explicitly not an MVC framework. It's a framework that allows the creation of loosely-coupled components while letting you decide what other pieces you need for your web application. You can use T3 with other frameworks like Backbone or React, or you can use T3 by itself.

redux-query is a library for querying and managing network state in React/Redux applications.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.5K
GitHub Stars
1.1K
GitHub Forks
145
GitHub Forks
67
Stacks
28
Stacks
6
Followers
39
Followers
15
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React
Redux
Redux

What are some alternatives to T3, redux-query?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase