Alternatives to Replit logo

Alternatives to Replit

JSFiddle, GitHub, CodePen, Glitch, and Codeanywhere are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Replit.
116
183
+ 1
16

What is Replit and what are its top alternatives?

It is a platform for creating and sharing software. You can write your code and host it all in the same place. It is also a place to learn how to code.
Replit is a tool in the Platform as a Service category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Replit

  • JSFiddle
    JSFiddle

    It is an online community for testing and showcasing user-created and collaborational HTML, CSS and JavaScript code snippets, known as 'fiddles'. It allows for simulated AJAX calls. ...

  • GitHub
    GitHub

    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together. ...

  • CodePen
    CodePen

    It is a social development environment for front-end designers and developers.. It functions as an online code editor and open-source learning environment, where developers can create code snippets, creatively named "pens", and test them. ...

  • Glitch
    Glitch

    Combining automated deployment, instant hosting and collaborative editing, Gomix gets you straight to coding. The apps you create are instantly live, hosted by us, and always up to date with your latest changes. Build products, prototype ideas, and hack solutions to problems. ...

  • Codeanywhere
    Codeanywhere

    A development platform that enables you to not only edit your files from underlying services like FTP, GitHub, Dropbox and the like, but on top of that gives you the ability to collaborate, embed and share through Codeanywhere on any device. ...

  • CodeSandbox
    CodeSandbox

    CodeSandbox allows developers to simply go to a URL in their browser to start building. This not only makes it easier to get started, it also makes it easier to share. You can just share your created work by sharing the URL, others can then (without downloading) further develop on these sandboxes. ...

  • PythonAnywhere
    PythonAnywhere

    It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps. ...

  • Jupyter
    Jupyter

    The Jupyter Notebook is a web-based interactive computing platform. The notebook combines live code, equations, narrative text, visualizations, interactive dashboards and other media. ...

Replit alternatives & related posts

JSFiddle logo

JSFiddle

34
69
0
An online code editor
34
69
+ 1
0
PROS OF JSFIDDLE
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF JSFIDDLE
    • 1
      Can't login with third-party app account

    related JSFiddle posts

    GitHub logo

    GitHub

    249.3K
    215K
    10.2K
    Powerful collaboration, review, and code management for open source and private development projects
    249.3K
    215K
    + 1
    10.2K
    PROS OF GITHUB
    • 1.8K
      Open source friendly
    • 1.5K
      Easy source control
    • 1.3K
      Nice UI
    • 1.1K
      Great for team collaboration
    • 864
      Easy setup
    • 503
      Issue tracker
    • 484
      Great community
    • 480
      Remote team collaboration
    • 450
      Great way to share
    • 441
      Pull request and features planning
    • 145
      Just works
    • 131
      Integrated in many tools
    • 119
      Free Public Repos
    • 114
      Github Gists
    • 110
      Github pages
    • 82
      Easy to find repos
    • 61
      Open source
    • 59
      Easy to find projects
    • 59
      It's free
    • 56
      Network effect
    • 48
      Extensive API
    • 42
      Organizations
    • 41
      Branching
    • 33
      Developer Profiles
    • 32
      Git Powered Wikis
    • 29
      Great for collaboration
    • 23
      It's fun
    • 22
      Community SDK involvement
    • 22
      Clean interface and good integrations
    • 19
      Learn from others source code
    • 15
      Because: Git
    • 14
      It integrates directly with Azure
    • 9
      Standard in Open Source collab
    • 9
      Newsfeed
    • 8
      It integrates directly with Hipchat
    • 7
      Fast
    • 7
      Beautiful user experience
    • 6
      Cloud SCM
    • 6
      Easy to discover new code libraries
    • 5
      Smooth integration
    • 5
      It's awesome
    • 5
      Integrations
    • 5
      Graphs
    • 5
      Nice API
    • 4
      Quick Onboarding
    • 4
      Remarkable uptime
    • 4
      Hands down best online Git service available
    • 4
      CI Integration
    • 4
      Reliable
    • 3
      Loved by developers
    • 3
      Free HTML hosting
    • 3
      Security options
    • 3
      Simple but powerful
    • 3
      Uses GIT
    • 3
      Unlimited Public Repos at no cost
    • 3
      Version Control
    • 3
      Easy to use and collaborate with others
    • 2
      Nice to use
    • 2
      IAM
    • 2
      Ci
    • 1
      Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects
    • 1
      Good tools support
    • 1
      Beautiful
    • 1
      Free HTML hostings
    • 1
      Self Hosted
    • 1
      All in one development service
    • 1
      Easy to use
    • 1
      Easy source control and everything is backed up
    • 1
      Leads the copycats
    • 1
      Never dethroned
    • 1
      IAM integration
    • 1
      Issues tracker
    • 1
      Very Easy to Use
    • 1
      Easy deployment via SSH
    • 1
      Free private repos
    • 0
      Profound
    CONS OF GITHUB
    • 52
      Owned by micrcosoft
    • 37
      Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
    • 15
      Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
    • 10
      API scoping could be better
    • 8
      Only 3 collaborators for private repos
    • 3
      Limited featureset for issue management
    • 2
      GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions
    • 2
      Does not have a graph for showing history like git lens
    • 1
      Have to use a token for the package registry
    • 1
      No multilingual interface
    • 1
      Takes a long time to commit

    related GitHub posts

    Johnny Bell

    I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

    I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

    I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

    Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

    Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

    With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

    If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

    See more
    Simon Reymann
    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 5.6M views

    Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

    • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
    • Respectively Git as revision control system
    • SourceTree as Git GUI
    • Visual Studio Code as IDE
    • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
    • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
    • SonarQube as quality gate
    • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
    • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
    • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
    • Heroku for deploying in test environments
    • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
    • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
    • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
    • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
    • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

    The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

    • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
    • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
    • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
    • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
    • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
    • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
    See more
    CodePen logo

    CodePen

    147
    209
    0
    An online community for testing and showcasing user-created HTML, CSS and JavaScript code snippets
    147
    209
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF CODEPEN
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF CODEPEN
      • 3
        No support for any other git-server than github

      related CodePen posts

      Shared insights
      on
      GitHubGitHubCodePenCodePenJavaScriptJavaScript

      Brand new (1 week) to coding. Corona killed my industry so I"m making a career change after 25 years. Studying HTML and CSS to become "vertically" proficient, before moving on to JavaScript. So at what point do I need to make a decision on CodePen vs GitHub?

      See more
      Glitch logo

      Glitch

      75
      162
      42
      Code, collaborate, and ship in seconds from your browser
      75
      162
      + 1
      42
      PROS OF GLITCH
      • 12
        Bang! App built
      • 9
        Instant APPification ;)
      • 7
        Auto commits
      • 4
        No no. limitation on free projects
      • 3
        Easy to use
      • 2
        Tons of usable code
      • 2
        Awesome support
      • 2
        Very fast API creation. Especially for small apps
      • 1
        Github Integration
      CONS OF GLITCH
      • 5
        UI could be better / cleaner
      • 2
        Limited Support/Diffficult to use Non-JS Languages
      • 1
        Not good for big projects
      • 1
        Cannot delete project, only the source code is

      related Glitch posts

      Codeanywhere logo

      Codeanywhere

      99
      237
      121
      Online code editor, available on iOS, Android and more. Integrates with GitHub and Dropbox
      99
      237
      + 1
      121
      PROS OF CODEANYWHERE
      • 17
        Sleek interface
      • 16
        3rd party integration
      • 13
        Easy to use
      • 11
        Web IDE
      • 9
        FTP support
      • 9
        Fast loading
      • 7
        Emmet
      • 5
        SSH Connections for free
      • 5
        Anywhere coding
      • 5
        Full root access
      • 4
        GitHub integration
      • 4
        Preconfigured development stacks
      • 4
        SFTP support
      • 4
        Private use for free
      • 3
        Easy setup
      • 2
        Amazon S3 Integration
      • 2
        Easy Setup, Containers
      • 1
        Code directly by FTP
      CONS OF CODEANYWHERE
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Codeanywhere posts

        CodeSandbox logo

        CodeSandbox

        84
        276
        19
        Online playground for React
        84
        276
        + 1
        19
        PROS OF CODESANDBOX
        • 7
          Awesome way to fun kickstart your ReactJS apps
        • 5
          Online vs-code editor look and feel to start react
        • 4
          Is open-source
        • 3
          Easiest way to showcase
        CONS OF CODESANDBOX
        • 3
          250 module limit
        • 1
          Hard to use the console

        related CodeSandbox posts

        PythonAnywhere logo

        PythonAnywhere

        91
        283
        63
        Micro PaaS for Python web apps. Develop and host Python from your browser
        91
        283
        + 1
        63
        PROS OF PYTHONANYWHERE
        • 14
          Web apps
        • 11
          Easy Setup
        • 8
          Shell access
        • 8
          Great support
        • 8
          Free plan
        • 7
          Super-easy to use
        • 5
          Libraries
        • 2
          Many things like Python are pre-installed
        CONS OF PYTHONANYWHERE
        • 1
          No root access
        • 1
          Really small community

        related PythonAnywhere posts

        I am going to send my website to a Venture Capitalist for inspection. If I succeed, I will get funding for my StartUp! This website is based on Django and Uses Keras and TensorFlow model to predict medical imaging. Should I use Heroku or PythonAnywhere to deploy my website ?? Best Regards, Adarsh.

        See more
        Jupyter logo

        Jupyter

        1.5K
        1.3K
        51
        Multi-language interactive computing environments.
        1.5K
        1.3K
        + 1
        51
        PROS OF JUPYTER
        • 18
          In-line code execution using blocks
        • 10
          In-line graphing support
        • 7
          Can be themed
        • 6
          Multiple kernel support
        • 3
          Best web-browser IDE for Python
        • 3
          Export to python code
        • 2
          LaTex Support
        • 1
          HTML export capability
        • 1
          Multi-user with Kubernetes
        CONS OF JUPYTER
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Jupyter posts

          Jan Vlnas
          Developer Advocate at Superface · | 5 upvotes · 40.6K views

          From my point of view, both OpenRefine and Apache Hive serve completely different purposes. OpenRefine is intended for interactive cleaning of messy data locally. You could work with their libraries to use some of OpenRefine features as part of your data pipeline (there are pointers in FAQ), but OpenRefine in general is intended for a single-user local operation.

          I can't recommend a particular alternative without better understanding of your use case. But if you are looking for an interactive tool to work with big data at scale, take a look at notebook environments like Jupyter, Databricks, or Deepnote. If you are building a data processing pipeline, consider also Apache Spark.

          Edit: Fixed references from Hadoop to Hive, which is actually closer to Spark.

          See more
          Guillaume Simler

          Jupyter Anaconda Pandas IPython

          A great way to prototype your data analytic modules. The use of the package is simple and user-friendly and the migration from ipython to python is fairly simple: a lot of cleaning, but no more.

          The negative aspect comes when you want to streamline your productive system or does CI with your anaconda environment: - most tools don't accept conda environments (as smoothly as pip requirements) - the conda environments (even with miniconda) have quite an overhead

          See more