Alternatives to Apache HTTP Server logo

Alternatives to Apache HTTP Server

Apache Tomcat, NGINX, JBoss, Jetty, and XAMPP are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Apache HTTP Server.
64.6K
22.6K
+ 1
1.4K

What is Apache HTTP Server and what are its top alternatives?

Apache HTTP Server is a widely-used open-source web server known for its flexibility, reliability, and extensive support for modules. It supports a variety of operating systems and programming languages, making it a popular choice for hosting websites and applications. However, Apache HTTP Server can be complex to configure and may require additional performance tuning for high traffic websites.

  1. Nginx: Nginx is a lightweight, high-performance web server known for its low resource usage and ability to handle a large number of concurrent connections. It also excels at serving static content quickly, making it a popular choice for websites with high traffic. However, it may not support as many modules and configurations out of the box compared to Apache HTTP Server.

  2. LiteSpeed Web Server: LiteSpeed Web Server is a high-performance commercial web server known for its speed and efficiency. It offers a range of features, including built-in caching and optimization tools, making it a suitable choice for websites that require fast loading times. However, the commercial license may be a limitation for some users compared to the free Apache HTTP Server.

  3. Caddy: Caddy is a modern, open-source web server that emphasizes ease of use and automatic HTTPS encryption. It comes with a simple configuration language and built-in features like Let's Encrypt integration, making it a user-friendly alternative to Apache HTTP Server. However, it may not offer the same level of customization and flexibility as Apache HTTP Server.

  4. Microsoft IIS: Internet Information Services (IIS) is a web server created by Microsoft for Windows servers. It offers a range of features and integration with other Microsoft products, making it a popular choice for organizations that use Windows environments. However, it may not be as widely supported across different operating systems compared to Apache HTTP Server.

  5. OpenLiteSpeed: OpenLiteSpeed is the open-source version of LiteSpeed Web Server, offering similar performance and features at no cost. It is designed to be lightweight and efficient while providing fast and secure web hosting capabilities. However, it may lack some advanced features present in the commercial version and may not have as extensive support compared to Apache HTTP Server.

  6. Caddy Web Server: Caddy is a powerful, enterprise-ready web server with automatic HTTPS by default. It has a simple configuration process and is suitable for showcasing static sites. However, it may require a commercial license for certain advanced features, unlike the free Apache HTTP Server.

  7. Cherokee: Cherokee is a high-performance, lightweight web server known for its ease of use and powerful features. It offers a web-based interface for configuration and management, making it user-friendly for beginners. However, it may not have as extensive support and community resources as Apache HTTP Server.

  8. HAProxy: HAProxy is a widely-used open-source software load balancer and proxy server known for its performance and reliability. It excels at handling a large number of concurrent connections and distributing traffic efficiently, making it a popular choice for high traffic websites. However, it may not offer the same level of web server functionality as Apache HTTP Server.

  9. Lighttpd: Lighttpd is a lightweight web server known for its speed and low resource consumption. It is designed to be efficient and easy to configure, making it suitable for hosting websites with high traffic or limited server resources. However, it may not have as many modules and features as Apache HTTP Server.

  10. Tengine: Tengine is a web server based on Nginx with added features and improvements for performance and stability. It offers enhanced load-balancing capabilities and support for dynamic content caching, making it a popular choice for high traffic websites. However, it may not have as extensive support and documentation as Apache HTTP Server.

Top Alternatives to Apache HTTP Server

  • Apache Tomcat
    Apache Tomcat

    Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations. ...

  • NGINX
    NGINX

    nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018. ...

  • JBoss
    JBoss

    An application platform for hosting your apps that provides an innovative modular, cloud-ready architecture, powerful management and automation, and world class developer productivity. ...

  • Jetty
    Jetty

    Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty. ...

  • XAMPP
    XAMPP

    It consists mainly of the Apache HTTP Server, MariaDB database, and interpreters for scripts written in the PHP and Perl programming languages. ...

  • Amazon EC2
    Amazon EC2

    It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers. ...

  • Firebase
    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    Amazon Web Services (AWS)

    It is a comprehensive and broadly adopted cloud platform, offering over 200 fully featured services from data centers globally. ...

Apache HTTP Server alternatives & related posts

Apache Tomcat logo

Apache Tomcat

16.7K
201
An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies
16.7K
201
PROS OF APACHE TOMCAT
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
CONS OF APACHE TOMCAT
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up

related Apache Tomcat posts

Остап Комплікевич

I need some advice to choose an engine for generation web pages from the Spring Boot app. Which technology is the best solution today? 1) JSP + JSTL 2) Apache FreeMarker 3) Thymeleaf Or you can suggest even other perspective tools. I am using Spring Boot, Spring Web, Spring Data, Spring Security, PostgreSQL, Apache Tomcat in my project. I have already tried to generate pages using jsp, jstl, and it went well. However, I had huge problems via carrying already created static pages, to jsp format, because of syntax. Thanks.

See more

Java Spring JUnit

Apache HTTP Server Apache Tomcat

MySQL

See more
NGINX logo

NGINX

113.9K
5.5K
A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.
113.9K
5.5K
PROS OF NGINX
  • 1.5K
    High-performance http server
  • 894
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
  • 289
    Free
  • 288
    Scalability
  • 226
    Web server
  • 175
    Simplicity
  • 136
    Easy setup
  • 30
    Content caching
  • 21
    Web Accelerator
  • 15
    Capability
  • 14
    Fast
  • 12
    High-latency
  • 12
    Predictability
  • 8
    Reverse Proxy
  • 7
    Supports http/2
  • 7
    The best of them
  • 5
    Great Community
  • 5
    Lots of Modules
  • 5
    Enterprise version
  • 4
    High perfomance proxy server
  • 3
    Embedded Lua scripting
  • 3
    Streaming media delivery
  • 3
    Streaming media
  • 3
    Reversy Proxy
  • 2
    Blash
  • 2
    GRPC-Web
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Fast and easy to set up
  • 2
    Slim
  • 2
    saltstack
  • 1
    Virtual hosting
  • 1
    Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast
  • 1
    Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior
  • 1
    Ingress controller
CONS OF NGINX
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription

related NGINX posts

Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 12.1M views

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively Git as revision control system
  • SourceTree as Git GUI
  • Visual Studio Code as IDE
  • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
  • SonarQube as quality gate
  • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
  • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
  • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
  • Heroku for deploying in test environments
  • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
  • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
  • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
See more
John-Daniel Trask
Co-founder & CEO at Raygun · | 19 upvotes · 504K views

We chose AWS because, at the time, it was really the only cloud provider to choose from.

We tend to use their basic building blocks (EC2, ELB, Amazon S3, Amazon RDS) rather than vendor specific components like databases and queuing. We deliberately decided to do this to ensure we could provide multi-cloud support or potentially move to another cloud provider if the offering was better for our customers.

We’ve utilized c3.large nodes for both the Node.js deployment and then for the .NET Core deployment. Both sit as backends behind an nginx instance and are managed using scaling groups in Amazon EC2 sitting behind a standard AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB).

While we’re satisfied with AWS, we do review our decision each year and have looked at Azure and Google Cloud offerings.

#CloudHosting #WebServers #CloudStorage #LoadBalancerReverseProxy

See more
JBoss logo

JBoss

338
0
An open source Java EE-based application server
338
0
PROS OF JBOSS
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF JBOSS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related JBoss posts

      Jetty logo

      Jetty

      473
      47
      An open-source project providing an HTTP server, HTTP client, and javax.servlet container
      473
      47
      PROS OF JETTY
      • 15
        Lightweight
      • 10
        Embeddable
      • 10
        Very fast
      • 6
        Very thin
      • 6
        Scalable
      CONS OF JETTY
      • 0
        Student

      related Jetty posts

      XAMPP logo

      XAMPP

      139
      6
      A free and open-source cross-platform web server solution stack package
      139
      6
      PROS OF XAMPP
      • 6
        Easy set up and installation of files
      CONS OF XAMPP
        Be the first to leave a con

        related XAMPP posts

        Shared insights
        on
        XAMPPXAMPPNGINXNGINX

        Hello everyone! I'm working on a web application, it will be deployed in a private local network so I need to choose which server I will use, so I need to know which one between NGINX and XAMPP, ps: I used to work with XAMPP since everything is integrated

        See more
        Helfried Plenk
        Senior Partner at IBS IT-DL GmbH · | 1 upvote · 681.9K views
        Shared insights
        on
        MAMPMAMPXAMPPXAMPPJoomla!Joomla!

        installing a local Joomla! 3.9 website for testing - I already downloaded an installed XAMPP - when now reading some other docs I found mentioned MAMP ... have I to change?

        See more
        Amazon EC2 logo

        Amazon EC2

        48.5K
        2.5K
        Scalable, pay-as-you-go compute capacity in the cloud
        48.5K
        2.5K
        PROS OF AMAZON EC2
        • 647
          Quick and reliable cloud servers
        • 515
          Scalability
        • 393
          Easy management
        • 277
          Low cost
        • 271
          Auto-scaling
        • 89
          Market leader
        • 80
          Backed by amazon
        • 79
          Reliable
        • 67
          Free tier
        • 58
          Easy management, scalability
        • 13
          Flexible
        • 10
          Easy to Start
        • 9
          Widely used
        • 9
          Web-scale
        • 9
          Elastic
        • 7
          Node.js API
        • 5
          Industry Standard
        • 4
          Lots of configuration options
        • 2
          GPU instances
        • 1
          Simpler to understand and learn
        • 1
          Extremely simple to use
        • 1
          Amazing for individuals
        • 1
          All the Open Source CLI tools you could want.
        CONS OF AMAZON EC2
        • 14
          Ui could use a lot of work
        • 6
          High learning curve when compared to PaaS
        • 3
          Extremely poor CPU performance

        related Amazon EC2 posts

        Ashish Singh
        Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest · | 38 upvotes · 3.4M views

        To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

        Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

        We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

        Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

        Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

        #BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

        See more
        Simon Reymann
        Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 12.1M views

        Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

        • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
        • Respectively Git as revision control system
        • SourceTree as Git GUI
        • Visual Studio Code as IDE
        • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
        • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
        • SonarQube as quality gate
        • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
        • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
        • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
        • Heroku for deploying in test environments
        • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
        • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
        • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
        • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
        • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

        The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

        • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
        • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
        • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
        • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
        • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
        • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
        See more
        Firebase logo

        Firebase

        41.4K
        2K
        The Realtime App Platform
        41.4K
        2K
        PROS OF FIREBASE
        • 371
          Realtime backend made easy
        • 270
          Fast and responsive
        • 242
          Easy setup
        • 215
          Real-time
        • 191
          JSON
        • 134
          Free
        • 128
          Backed by google
        • 83
          Angular adaptor
        • 68
          Reliable
        • 36
          Great customer support
        • 32
          Great documentation
        • 25
          Real-time synchronization
        • 21
          Mobile friendly
        • 19
          Rapid prototyping
        • 14
          Great security
        • 12
          Automatic scaling
        • 11
          Freakingly awesome
        • 8
          Super fast development
        • 8
          Angularfire is an amazing addition!
        • 8
          Chat
        • 6
          Firebase hosting
        • 6
          Built in user auth/oauth
        • 6
          Awesome next-gen backend
        • 6
          Ios adaptor
        • 4
          Speed of light
        • 4
          Very easy to use
        • 3
          Great
        • 3
          It's made development super fast
        • 3
          Brilliant for startups
        • 2
          Free hosting
        • 2
          Cloud functions
        • 2
          JS Offline and Sync suport
        • 2
          Low battery consumption
        • 2
          .net
        • 2
          The concurrent updates create a great experience
        • 2
          Push notification
        • 2
          I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
        • 2
          Great all-round functionality
        • 2
          Free authentication solution
        • 1
          Easy Reactjs integration
        • 1
          Google's support
        • 1
          Free SSL
        • 1
          CDN & cache out of the box
        • 1
          Easy to use
        • 1
          Large
        • 1
          Faster workflow
        • 1
          Serverless
        • 1
          Good Free Limits
        • 1
          Simple and easy
        CONS OF FIREBASE
        • 31
          Can become expensive
        • 16
          No open source, you depend on external company
        • 15
          Scalability is not infinite
        • 9
          Not Flexible Enough
        • 7
          Cant filter queries
        • 3
          Very unstable server
        • 3
          No Relational Data
        • 2
          Too many errors
        • 2
          No offline sync

        related Firebase posts

        Stephen Gheysens
        Lead Solutions Engineer at Inscribe · | 14 upvotes · 1.9M views

        Hi Otensia! I'd definitely recommend using the skills you've already got and building with JavaScript is a smart way to go these days. Most platform services have JavaScript/Node SDKs or NPM packages, many serverless platforms support Node in case you need to write any backend logic, and JavaScript is incredibly popular - meaning it will be easy to hire for, should you ever need to.

        My advice would be "don't reinvent the wheel". If you already have a skill set that will work well to solve the problem at hand, and you don't need it for any other projects, don't spend the time jumping into a new language. If you're looking for an excuse to learn something new, it would be better to invest that time in learning a new platform/tool that compliments your knowledge of JavaScript. For this project, I might recommend using Netlify, Vercel, or Google Firebase to quickly and easily deploy your web app. If you need to add user authentication, there are great examples out there for Firebase Authentication, Auth0, or even Magic (a newcomer on the Auth scene, but very user friendly). All of these services work very well with a JavaScript-based application.

        See more
        Eugene Cheah

        For inboxkitten.com, an opensource disposable email service;

        We migrated our serverless workload from Cloud Functions for Firebase to CloudFlare workers, taking advantage of the lower cost and faster-performing edge computing of Cloudflare network. Made possible due to our extremely low CPU and RAM overhead of our serverless functions.

        If I were to summarize the limitation of Cloudflare (as oppose to firebase/gcp functions), it would be ...

        1. <5ms CPU time limit
        2. Incompatible with express.js
        3. one script limitation per domain

        Limitations our workload is able to conform with (YMMV)

        For hosting of static files, we migrated from Firebase to CommonsHost

        More details on the trade-off in between both serverless providers is in the article

        See more
        Amazon Web Services (AWS) logo

        Amazon Web Services (AWS)

        30.3K
        0
        A comprehensive and broadly adopted cloud platform
        30.3K
        0
        PROS OF AMAZON WEB SERVICES (AWS)
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF AMAZON WEB SERVICES (AWS)
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Amazon Web Services (AWS) posts

            waheed khan
            Associate Java Developer at txtsol · | 12 upvotes · 94.2K views

            I want to make application like Zomato, #Foodpanda.

            Which stack is best for this? As I have expertise in Java and Angular. What is the best stack you will recommend?

            Web Micro-service / Mono? Angular / React? Amazon Web Services (AWS) / Google Cloud Platform? DB : SQL or No SQL

            Mob Cross-platform: React Native / Flutter

            Note: We are a team of 5. what languages do you recommend if I go with microservices?

            Thanks

            See more
            Santiago Velasco
            Java Software Developer at ViewNext · | 8 upvotes · 37.6K views

            Hello everyone, I would like to start using a cloud service to host my projects, which are web applications. If anyone has enough experience with Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Google Cloud Platform, I would like to know which of these is most recommended to use, depending on the features they have or how used they are. Thank you so much.

            See more