Alternatives to Apache HTTP Server logo

Alternatives to Apache HTTP Server

Apache Tomcat, NGINX, JBoss, Jetty, and XAMPP are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Apache HTTP Server.
64.1K
22.3K
+ 1
1.4K

What is Apache HTTP Server and what are its top alternatives?

Apache HTTP Server is a widely-used open-source web server known for its flexibility, reliability, and extensive support for modules. It supports a variety of operating systems and programming languages, making it a popular choice for hosting websites and applications. However, Apache HTTP Server can be complex to configure and may require additional performance tuning for high traffic websites.

  1. Nginx: Nginx is a lightweight, high-performance web server known for its low resource usage and ability to handle a large number of concurrent connections. It also excels at serving static content quickly, making it a popular choice for websites with high traffic. However, it may not support as many modules and configurations out of the box compared to Apache HTTP Server.

  2. LiteSpeed Web Server: LiteSpeed Web Server is a high-performance commercial web server known for its speed and efficiency. It offers a range of features, including built-in caching and optimization tools, making it a suitable choice for websites that require fast loading times. However, the commercial license may be a limitation for some users compared to the free Apache HTTP Server.

  3. Caddy: Caddy is a modern, open-source web server that emphasizes ease of use and automatic HTTPS encryption. It comes with a simple configuration language and built-in features like Let's Encrypt integration, making it a user-friendly alternative to Apache HTTP Server. However, it may not offer the same level of customization and flexibility as Apache HTTP Server.

  4. Microsoft IIS: Internet Information Services (IIS) is a web server created by Microsoft for Windows servers. It offers a range of features and integration with other Microsoft products, making it a popular choice for organizations that use Windows environments. However, it may not be as widely supported across different operating systems compared to Apache HTTP Server.

  5. OpenLiteSpeed: OpenLiteSpeed is the open-source version of LiteSpeed Web Server, offering similar performance and features at no cost. It is designed to be lightweight and efficient while providing fast and secure web hosting capabilities. However, it may lack some advanced features present in the commercial version and may not have as extensive support compared to Apache HTTP Server.

  6. Caddy Web Server: Caddy is a powerful, enterprise-ready web server with automatic HTTPS by default. It has a simple configuration process and is suitable for showcasing static sites. However, it may require a commercial license for certain advanced features, unlike the free Apache HTTP Server.

  7. Cherokee: Cherokee is a high-performance, lightweight web server known for its ease of use and powerful features. It offers a web-based interface for configuration and management, making it user-friendly for beginners. However, it may not have as extensive support and community resources as Apache HTTP Server.

  8. HAProxy: HAProxy is a widely-used open-source software load balancer and proxy server known for its performance and reliability. It excels at handling a large number of concurrent connections and distributing traffic efficiently, making it a popular choice for high traffic websites. However, it may not offer the same level of web server functionality as Apache HTTP Server.

  9. Lighttpd: Lighttpd is a lightweight web server known for its speed and low resource consumption. It is designed to be efficient and easy to configure, making it suitable for hosting websites with high traffic or limited server resources. However, it may not have as many modules and features as Apache HTTP Server.

  10. Tengine: Tengine is a web server based on Nginx with added features and improvements for performance and stability. It offers enhanced load-balancing capabilities and support for dynamic content caching, making it a popular choice for high traffic websites. However, it may not have as extensive support and documentation as Apache HTTP Server.

Top Alternatives to Apache HTTP Server

  • Apache Tomcat
    Apache Tomcat

    Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations. ...

  • NGINX
    NGINX

    nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018. ...

  • JBoss
    JBoss

    An application platform for hosting your apps that provides an innovative modular, cloud-ready architecture, powerful management and automation, and world class developer productivity. ...

  • Jetty
    Jetty

    Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty. ...

  • XAMPP
    XAMPP

    It consists mainly of the Apache HTTP Server, MariaDB database, and interpreters for scripts written in the PHP and Perl programming languages. ...

  • Microsoft IIS
    Microsoft IIS

    Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks. ...

  • OpenResty
    OpenResty

    OpenResty (aka. ngx_openresty) is a full-fledged web application server by bundling the standard Nginx core, lots of 3rd-party Nginx modules, as well as most of their external dependencies. ...

  • LiteSpeed
    LiteSpeed

    It is a drop-in Apache replacement and the leading high-performance, high-scalability server. You can replace your existing Apache server with it without changing your configuration or operating system details. As a drop-in replacement, it allows you to quickly eliminate Apache bottlenecks in 15 minutes with zero downtime. ...

Apache HTTP Server alternatives & related posts

Apache Tomcat logo

Apache Tomcat

16.3K
12.2K
201
An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies
16.3K
12.2K
+ 1
201
PROS OF APACHE TOMCAT
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
CONS OF APACHE TOMCAT
  • 2
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 1
    Easy to set up

related Apache Tomcat posts

Остап Комплікевич

I need some advice to choose an engine for generation web pages from the Spring Boot app. Which technology is the best solution today? 1) JSP + JSTL 2) Apache FreeMarker 3) Thymeleaf Or you can suggest even other perspective tools. I am using Spring Boot, Spring Web, Spring Data, Spring Security, PostgreSQL, Apache Tomcat in my project. I have already tried to generate pages using jsp, jstl, and it went well. However, I had huge problems via carrying already created static pages, to jsp format, because of syntax. Thanks.

See more

Java Spring JUnit

Apache HTTP Server Apache Tomcat

MySQL

See more
NGINX logo

NGINX

112K
59.9K
5.5K
A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.
112K
59.9K
+ 1
5.5K
PROS OF NGINX
  • 1.4K
    High-performance http server
  • 893
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
  • 288
    Free
  • 288
    Scalability
  • 225
    Web server
  • 175
    Simplicity
  • 136
    Easy setup
  • 30
    Content caching
  • 21
    Web Accelerator
  • 15
    Capability
  • 14
    Fast
  • 12
    High-latency
  • 12
    Predictability
  • 8
    Reverse Proxy
  • 7
    The best of them
  • 7
    Supports http/2
  • 5
    Great Community
  • 5
    Lots of Modules
  • 5
    Enterprise version
  • 4
    High perfomance proxy server
  • 3
    Reversy Proxy
  • 3
    Streaming media delivery
  • 3
    Streaming media
  • 3
    Embedded Lua scripting
  • 2
    GRPC-Web
  • 2
    Blash
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Fast and easy to set up
  • 2
    Slim
  • 2
    saltstack
  • 1
    Virtual hosting
  • 1
    Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast
  • 1
    Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior
  • 1
    Ingress controller
CONS OF NGINX
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription

related NGINX posts

Recently I have been working on an open source stack to help people consolidate their personal health data in a single database so that AI and analytics apps can be run against it to find personalized treatments. We chose to go with a #containerized approach leveraging Docker #containers with a local development environment setup with Docker Compose and nginx for container routing. For the production environment we chose to pull code from GitHub and build/push images using Jenkins and using Kubernetes to deploy to Amazon EC2.

We also implemented a dashboard app to handle user authentication/authorization, as well as a custom SSO server that runs on Heroku which allows experts to easily visit more than one instance without having to login repeatedly. The #Backend was implemented using my favorite #Stack which consists of FeathersJS on top of Node.js and ExpressJS with PostgreSQL as the main database. The #Frontend was implemented using React, Redux.js, Semantic UI React and the FeathersJS client. Though testing was light on this project, we chose to use AVA as well as ESLint to keep the codebase clean and consistent.

See more

Around the time of their Series A, Pinterest’s stack included Python and Django, with Tornado and Node.js as web servers. Memcached / Membase and Redis handled caching, with RabbitMQ handling queueing. Nginx, HAproxy and Varnish managed static-delivery and load-balancing, with persistent data storage handled by MySQL.

See more
JBoss logo

JBoss

328
249
0
An open source Java EE-based application server
328
249
+ 1
0
PROS OF JBOSS
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF JBOSS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related JBoss posts

      Jetty logo

      Jetty

      464
      308
      43
      An open-source project providing an HTTP server, HTTP client, and javax.servlet container
      464
      308
      + 1
      43
      PROS OF JETTY
      • 14
        Lightweight
      • 10
        Very fast
      • 9
        Embeddable
      • 5
        Scalable
      • 5
        Very thin
      CONS OF JETTY
      • 0
        Student

      related Jetty posts

      XAMPP logo

      XAMPP

      132
      269
      6
      A free and open-source cross-platform web server solution stack package
      132
      269
      + 1
      6
      PROS OF XAMPP
      • 6
        Easy set up and installation of files
      CONS OF XAMPP
        Be the first to leave a con

        related XAMPP posts

        Shared insights
        on
        XAMPPXAMPPNGINXNGINX

        Hello everyone! I'm working on a web application, it will be deployed in a private local network so I need to choose which server I will use, so I need to know which one between NGINX and XAMPP, ps: I used to work with XAMPP since everything is integrated

        See more
        Helfried Plenk
        Senior Partner at IBS IT-DL GmbH · | 1 upvote · 672.8K views
        Shared insights
        on
        MAMPMAMPXAMPPXAMPPJoomla!Joomla!

        installing a local Joomla! 3.9 website for testing - I already downloaded an installed XAMPP - when now reading some other docs I found mentioned MAMP ... have I to change?

        See more
        Microsoft IIS logo

        Microsoft IIS

        15.2K
        7.5K
        236
        A web server for Microsoft Windows
        15.2K
        7.5K
        + 1
        236
        PROS OF MICROSOFT IIS
        • 83
          Great with .net
        • 55
          I'm forced to use iis
        • 27
          Use nginx
        • 18
          Azure integration
        • 15
          Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
        • 10
          Fast
        • 6
          Reliable
        • 6
          Performance
        • 4
          Powerful
        • 3
          Simple to configure
        • 3
          Webserver
        • 2
          Easy setup
        • 1
          Shipped with Windows Server
        • 1
          Ssl integration
        • 1
          Security
        • 1
          Охуенный
        CONS OF MICROSOFT IIS
        • 1
          Hard to set up

        related Microsoft IIS posts

        I am currently in school for computer science and am doing a class project about web servers. Our assignment is to research and select one of these web servers. Could you please let me know which one you would choose among NGINX, Microsoft IIS, and Apache HTTP Server and why?

        See more
        OpenResty logo

        OpenResty

        2.3K
        227
        0
        Turning Nginx into a Full-fledged Web App Server
        2.3K
        227
        + 1
        0
        PROS OF OPENRESTY
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF OPENRESTY
            Be the first to leave a con

            related OpenResty posts

            Chris McFadden
            VP, Engineering at SparkPost · | 7 upvotes · 290.3K views
            Shared insights
            on
            NGINXNGINXOpenRestyOpenRestyLuaLua
            at

            We use nginx and OpenResty as our API proxy running on EC2 for auth, caching, and some rate limiting for our dozens of microservices. Since OpenResty support embedded Lua we were able to write a custom access module that calls out to our authentication service with the resource, method, and access token. If that succeeds then critical account info is passed down to the underlying microservice. This proxy approach keeps all authentication and authorization in one place and provides a unified CX for our API users. Nginx is fast and cheap to run though we are always exploring alternatives that are also economical. What do you use?

            See more

            At Kong while building an internal tool, we struggled to route metrics to Prometheus and logs to Logstash without incurring too much latency in our metrics collection.

            We replaced nginx with OpenResty on the edge of our tool which allowed us to use the lua-nginx-module to run Lua code that captures metrics and records telemetry data during every request’s log phase. Our code then pushes the metrics to a local aggregator process (written in Go) which in turn exposes them in Prometheus Exposition Format for consumption by Prometheus. This solution reduced the number of components we needed to maintain and is fast thanks to NGINX and LuaJIT.

            See more
            LiteSpeed logo

            LiteSpeed

            2.3K
            124
            0
            A drop-in Apache replacement and the leading high-performance, high-scalability server
            2.3K
            124
            + 1
            0
            PROS OF LITESPEED
              Be the first to leave a pro
              CONS OF LITESPEED
                Be the first to leave a con

                related LiteSpeed posts