Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache HTTP Server vs lighttpd vs nginx: What are the differences?
Differences between Apache HTTP Server, lighttpd, and Nginx
Apache HTTP Server, lighttpd, and Nginx are web servers that are widely used for hosting websites. While all three web servers have similar purposes, there are key differences between them. In this article, we will highlight the main differences between Apache HTTP Server, lighttpd, and Nginx.
Performance and Resource Usage: Nginx is known for its superior performance and efficient resource usage. It is designed to handle a large number of concurrent connections with minimal memory footprint. On the other hand, Apache HTTP Server is known for its flexibility and feature-richness, but it consumes more memory and resources compared to Nginx. Lighttpd is lightweight and designed for high-performance scenarios, making it ideal for serving static content.
Architecture and Event-Driven Design: Apache HTTP Server follows a traditional process-driven architecture where each request is handled by a separate process or thread. This architecture is robust but not as efficient as the event-driven design followed by Nginx and lighttpd. Nginx and lighttpd use an event-driven model with asynchronous I/O, which allows them to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.
Module and Extension System: Apache HTTP Server has a vast ecosystem of modules and extensions, providing a wide range of functionality and flexibility. It supports a diverse range of programming languages and offers extensive customization options. Lighttpd also has a modular architecture but does not have as many modules as Apache HTTP Server. Nginx follows a lightweight and minimalistic approach, offering a smaller selection of built-in modules but excelling in efficiency.
Configuration and Ease of Use: Apache HTTP Server has a complex and verbose configuration system, requiring a steep learning curve for beginners. Lighttpd provides a simpler configuration syntax compared to Apache HTTP Server, making it easier to set up and manage. Nginx follows a similar configuration style as lighttpd, which is straightforward and easy to understand. Once acquainted, Nginx's configuration tends to be more intuitive.
Flexibility and Use Cases: Apache HTTP Server is known for its versatility and can be used for a wide variety of use cases. It supports a multitude of modules, making it suitable for complex web applications and content management systems. Lighttpd is ideal for lightweight scenarios where speed and efficiency are crucial, such as serving static files or low-resource environments. Nginx strikes a balance between the feature-richness of Apache HTTP Server and the lightweight design of lighttpd, making it suitable for both simple and complex applications.
Server Market Share and Community Support: Apache HTTP Server has been the most popular web server for many years and has a large and active community. It has a significant market share, which means it has a wealth of resources, documentation, and community support available. Lighttpd has a smaller market share but still has an active community and provides good documentation. Nginx has gained popularity in recent years and has a rapidly growing community with excellent support and resources.
In summary, the main differences between Apache HTTP Server, lighttpd, and Nginx lie in their performance, resource usage, architecture, module system, ease of use, flexibility, and market share. Each web server has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the project or application.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."
I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.
I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure
I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works
For us, NGINX is a lite HTTP server easy to configure. On our research, we found a well-documented software we a lot of support from the community.
We have been using it alongside tools like certbot and it has been a total success.
We can easily configure our sites and have a folder for available vs enabled sites, and with the nginx -t command we can easily check everything is running fine.
- Server rendered HTML output from PHP is being migrated to the client as Vue.js components, future plans to provide additional content, and other new miscellaneous features all result in a substantial increase of static files needing to be served from the server. NGINX has better performance than Apache for serving static content.
- The change to NGINX will require switching from PHP to PHP-FPM resulting in a distributed architecture with a higher complexity configuration, but this is outweighed by PHP-FPM being faster than PHP for processing requests.
- The NGINX + PHP-FPM setup now allows for horizontally scaling of resources rather vertically scaling the previously combined Apache + PHP resources.
- PHP shell tasks can now efficiently be decoupled from the application reducing main application footprint and allow for scaling of tasks on an individual basis.
I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to 1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly. 2. Install apache and tomcat. 3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server. 4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports. 5. Create users on RHEL for application support team. 6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.
I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.
Pros of Apache HTTP Server
- Web server479
- Most widely-used web server305
- Virtual hosting217
- Fast148
- Ssl support138
- Since 199644
- Asynchronous28
- Robust5
- Proven over many years4
- Mature2
- Perfomance2
- Perfect Support1
- Many available modules0
- Many available modules0
Pros of lighttpd
- Lightweight7
- Easy setup6
- Virtal hosting2
- Simplicity2
- Full featured2
- Proxy2
- Open source2
- Available modules1
- Fast1
- Security1
- Ssl support1
Pros of NGINX
- High-performance http server1.4K
- Performance894
- Easy to configure730
- Open source607
- Load balancer530
- Free289
- Scalability288
- Web server226
- Simplicity175
- Easy setup136
- Content caching30
- Web Accelerator21
- Capability15
- Fast14
- High-latency12
- Predictability12
- Reverse Proxy8
- The best of them7
- Supports http/27
- Great Community5
- Lots of Modules5
- Enterprise version5
- High perfomance proxy server4
- Embedded Lua scripting3
- Streaming media delivery3
- Streaming media3
- Reversy Proxy3
- Blash2
- GRPC-Web2
- Lightweight2
- Fast and easy to set up2
- Slim2
- saltstack2
- Virtual hosting1
- Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast1
- Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior1
- Ingress controller1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apache HTTP Server
- Hard to set up4
Cons of lighttpd
Cons of NGINX
- Advanced features require subscription10