StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs Jetty vs nginx

Apache Tomcat vs Jetty vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Jetty
Jetty
Stacks510
Followers311
Votes47
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K

Apache Tomcat vs Jetty vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Apache Tomcat, Jetty, and Nginx, three popular web server technologies. We will explore their distinctive features and functionalities to help you understand which one suits your specific requirements.

  1. Scalability: Apache Tomcat, Jetty, and Nginx have different approaches to scalability. Apache Tomcat is known for its superior ability to handle multiple concurrent connections and is commonly used for enterprise-level applications. Jetty, on the other hand, is designed to be lightweight and is well-suited for applications that require fast startup time and low memory consumption. Nginx is renowned for its high-performance and scalability, particularly in scenarios where a huge number of concurrent connections are anticipated.

  2. Deployment and Configuration: While all three web servers offer various deployment and configuration options, Apache Tomcat focuses primarily on deploying Java-based web applications using its own deployment descriptors and servlet annotations. Jetty, on the other hand, provides flexible deployment options that include embedding it within Java applications or using it as a standalone server. Nginx is primarily a reverse proxy server that can be used for load balancing and HTTP caching, often used in conjunction with application servers like Apache Tomcat or Jetty.

  3. Supported Protocols: Each web server supports different protocols. Apache Tomcat is primarily designed for Java web applications and supports servlets and JavaServer Pages (JSP). Jetty is also built for Java applications but includes support for WebSocket and asynchronous HTTP. Nginx, however, is a general-purpose web server that supports various protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, WebSocket, and reverse proxying.

  4. Performance and Efficiency: When it comes to performance, Jetty is widely regarded as one of the fastest web servers available, with low latency and minimal memory footprint. Apache Tomcat, while not as lightweight as Jetty, still provides good performance and scalability for Java-based applications. Nginx is known for its exceptional performance, especially for static content delivery and simultaneous connections handling.

  5. Community and Support: All three web servers have active communities and vibrant ecosystems. Apache Tomcat has a large and long-standing community, with extensive documentation and numerous online resources available. Jetty has a smaller but dedicated community and provides excellent documentation. Nginx benefits from a vast community and has robust support resources that include official documentation and various online forums.

  6. Use Cases: Due to its scalability and Java-focused features, Apache Tomcat is often used in enterprise-level applications that require compatibility with the Java ecosystem. Jetty's lightweight and fast startup time make it an ideal choice for applications that require quick development iterations and lower memory consumption. Nginx, with its high performance, scalability, and versatility, is commonly used as a load balancer, reverse proxy, or caching server in various scenarios.

In summary, Apache Tomcat is known for its scalability and Java-focused features, Jetty excels in terms of lightweightness and quick startup time, while Nginx stands out for its impressive performance, versatility, and broad protocol support. Selecting the appropriate web server depends on the specific needs of your application and the desired functionality you require.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Jetty, Apache Tomcat

Daniel
Daniel

Co-Founder at Polpo Data Analytics & Software Development

May 25, 2021

Decided

For us, NGINX is a lite HTTP server easy to configure. On our research, we found a well-documented software we a lot of support from the community.

We have been using it alongside tools like certbot and it has been a total success.

We can easily configure our sites and have a folder for available vs enabled sites, and with the nginx -t command we can easily check everything is running fine.

289k views289k
Comments
Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments
greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Jetty
Jetty
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

-
Full-featured and standards-based; Open source and commercially usable; Flexible and extensible; Small footprint; Embeddable; Asynchronous; Enterprise scalable; Dual licensed under Apache and Eclipse
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
510
Stacks
16.9K
Followers
61.9K
Followers
311
Followers
12.6K
Votes
5.5K
Votes
47
Votes
201
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Very fast
  • 10
    Embeddable
  • 6
    Scalable
  • 6
    Very thin
Cons
  • 0
    Student
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Jetty, Apache Tomcat?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Caddy

Caddy

Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

Cowboy

Cowboy

Cowboy aims to provide a complete HTTP stack in a small code base. It is optimized for low latency and low memory usage, in part because it uses binary strings. Cowboy provides routing capabilities, selectively dispatching requests to handlers written in Erlang.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase