StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Robot Framework vs ScalaTest

Robot Framework vs ScalaTest

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Robot Framework
Robot Framework
Stacks344
Followers525
Votes120
ScalaTest
ScalaTest
Stacks857
Followers30
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.2K
Forks340

Robot Framework vs ScalaTest: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will be discussing the key differences between Robot Framework and ScalaTest.

  1. Syntax and Approach: Robot Framework is a generic keyword-driven testing framework that uses a tabular format for its test cases and incur a more declarative approach. On the other hand, ScalaTest is a testing tool specifically designed for the Scala programming language and follows a more traditional programming syntax and an imperative approach.

  2. Programming Language: Robot Framework is platform-independent and supports multiple programming languages like Python, Java, and .NET. In contrast, ScalaTest is written exclusively for Scala, and it leverages the object-oriented and functional programming capabilities of the language.

  3. Test Organization: Robot Framework organizes tests into Test Suites, which are collections of Test Cases, and Test Cases consist of a series of Keywords. ScalaTest, on the other hand, organizes tests using Spec and Suite classes, which group different test cases and allows for various styles of test organization.

  4. Extensibility: Robot Framework provides a wide range of libraries and keyword-driven test libraries that can be easily extended through the use of external libraries and custom keywords. ScalaTest, being a more specific framework, offers extensive support for a variety of testing styles (such as FunSpec, FlatSpec, and WordSpec) but may have limited options for extending its core functionality.

  5. Parallel Execution: Robot Framework is known for its built-in support for parallel test execution, allowing multiple test cases to run simultaneously. On the other hand, ScalaTest may require additional configuration and setup to achieve parallel execution, depending on the testing style used.

  6. Ecosystem and Community: Robot Framework has a large and active community, with a wide variety of pre-built libraries and tools available. It also has excellent documentation and extensive support. ScalaTest, being more focused on the Scala language, benefits from the vast ecosystem and community of the Scala community, including integration with popular build tools like sbt.

In summary, Robot Framework is a versatile and generic automation testing tool that supports multiple programming languages and follows a keyword-driven and declarative approach. ScalaTest, on the other hand, is specifically designed for Scala and provides an extensive suite of testing styles and a more traditional programming syntax, leveraging the functional and object-oriented features of Scala.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Robot Framework
Robot Framework
ScalaTest
ScalaTest

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

You can test Scala, Scala.js (JavaScript), and Java code with this tool. It makes it easy to take your testing to a higher, more productive level in new or existing Scala, Scala.js, or Java projects.

-
Test Scala, Scala.js (JavaScript), and Java code; Designed to grow with the demands of its users;Uses its own extension points to support several styles of testing out of the box
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
340
Stacks
344
Stacks
857
Followers
525
Followers
30
Votes
120
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 23
    Easy with CI/CD
  • 22
    Open Source
  • 21
    Simple Usage
  • 14
    Easily extendable
  • 13
    Vast Scope more than Front End
Cons
  • 8
    Nested Loops
  • 1
    Mostly for python
  • 1
    Devtooling is not there
  • 0
    Extensive library support
  • 0
    Mobile supports
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Scala
Scala
Selenium
Selenium
Java
Java
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Eclipse
Eclipse
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
JUnit
JUnit
NetBeans IDE
NetBeans IDE
TestNG
TestNG
Scala.js
Scala.js

What are some alternatives to Robot Framework, ScalaTest?

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana