StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Sapper vs TypeORM

Sapper vs TypeORM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sapper
Sapper
Stacks41
Followers56
Votes0
TypeORM
TypeORM
Stacks757
Followers813
Votes81
GitHub Stars36.0K
Forks6.5K

Sapper vs TypeORM: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Sapper and TypeORM are two popular tools used for web development, with Sapper being a framework for building web applications and TypeORM being an Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) library.

1. **Language**: Sapper is a framework that works specifically with JavaScript and TypeScript, allowing developers to build web applications using these languages. On the other hand, TypeORM is an ORM library that supports multiple programming languages such as JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, and more.
2. **Purpose**: Sapper is designed as a framework for creating efficient and performant web applications by providing server-side rendering and code-splitting capabilities. TypeORM, on the other hand, focuses on simplifying database interactions by providing an ORM layer for database operations.
3. **Technology stack**: Sapper operates within the Svelte ecosystem, a front-end framework, and leverages its features like reactive declarations and virtual DOM. In contrast, TypeORM is independent of any front-end framework and can be used with a wide range of web technologies.
4. **Use case**: Sapper is best suited for building static sites, blogs, or dynamic web applications that require server-side rendering. TypeORM, on the other hand, is ideal for projects that involve a lot of database interactions and require mapping of database entities to object-oriented models.
5. **Learning curve**: Sapper has a relatively steeper learning curve compared to TypeORM due to its specialized focus on front-end development and server-side rendering. TypeORM, being an ORM library, has a more generic use case and may be easier to grasp for developers familiar with database operations.
6. **Community support**: Sapper has a smaller but growing community of developers due to its association with the Svelte ecosystem. TypeORM, being a widely used ORM library across different programming languages, has a larger and more established community for support and resources.

In Summary, Sapper is a JavaScript/TypeScript framework for web applications with a focus on server-side rendering, while TypeORM is a versatile ORM library that simplifies database interactions across multiple programming languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sapper
Sapper
TypeORM
TypeORM

Sapper focuses on easy of use. It is alpha now and only compiled with rust nightly.

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Async, based on hyper mio branch; Sapper supplies only basic framework; Sapper only processes small request and response (with small request body, returning small response body) now; Three level granularity (global, module, function handler) middleware controller and unified middleware presentation; Typesafe abstraction, keep the same spirit with hyper; For easy using, will supply some convenient macros to help write business logic; Global object cross requests;
automatically create the database table schemes based on your models; transparently insert / update / delete to the database your objects; map your selections from tables to JavaScript objects and map table columns to object properties; easily create one-to-one, many-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many relations between tables; and much more.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
36.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.5K
Stacks
41
Stacks
757
Followers
56
Followers
813
Votes
0
Votes
81
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 0
    Less bundle Size
Pros
  • 30
    Typescript
  • 12
    Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Ser
  • 9
    Cons of TypeORM
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 7
    Works in NodeJS, Browser, Ionic, Cordova and Electron p
Cons
  • 5
    Completely abandoned by its creator
  • 3
    Too complex for what it does
  • 2
    Doesn't really support native javascript
  • 1
    Cannot use query on any relation
  • 1
    Not proper/real type safety
Integrations
Rust
Rust
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Sapper, TypeORM?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase