Skeleton vs sauron (framework)

Overview

Skeleton

Stacks54

Followers100

Votes24

GitHub Stars19.7K

Forks3.1K

sauron (framework)

Stacks2

Followers10

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.0K

Forks61

Skeleton vs sauron (framework): What are the differences?

Grid System: Skeleton framework uses a responsive 12-column grid system, while Sauron framework offers a more flexible 16-column grid system for better layout control.
Typography: Skeleton focuses on simple and clean typography styles by default, whereas Sauron provides more options and customization for typography to suit different design needs.
Styling Options: Sauron offers more extensive styling options and pre-built components compared to Skeleton, making it more suitable for complex or visually rich designs.
Components: While Skeleton focuses on providing a lightweight framework with essential components, Sauron includes a wider range of components and elements for building versatile and feature-rich websites.
Customization: Sauron allows for deeper customization through SASS variables and mixins, while Skeleton offers limited customization options out of the box.
Documentation: Sauron provides more comprehensive and detailed documentation, including examples and usage guidelines, compared to the minimalistic documentation of Skeleton.

In Summary, the key differences between Skeleton and Sauron frameworks lie in their grid systems, typography options, styling capabilities, components, customization options, and documentation levels.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Skeleton	sauron (framework)
Skeleton is a small collection of CSS files that can help you rapidly develop sites that look beautiful at any size, be it a 17" laptop screen or an iPhone.	With the goal to closely adhere to The Elm Architecture. As with elm, sauron doesn't use macros to provide the view, instead it just uses plain Rust function calls to construct the view.
Responsive Grid Down To Mobile;Fast to Start;Style Agnostic;	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 19.7K	GitHub Stars 2.0K
GitHub Forks 3.1K	GitHub Forks 61
Stacks 54	Stacks 2
Followers 100	Followers 10
Votes 24	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 9 Minimalist 6 Responsive 4 Simple 2 Fantastically straight forward 1 Lightweight Cons 0 Have to make design decisions	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Rust HTML5

What are some alternatives to Skeleton, sauron (framework)?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Skeleton vs sauron (framework): What are the differences?

Grid System: Skeleton framework uses a responsive 12-column grid system, while Sauron framework offers a more flexible 16-column grid system for better layout control.
Typography: Skeleton focuses on simple and clean typography styles by default, whereas Sauron provides more options and customization for typography to suit different design needs.
Styling Options: Sauron offers more extensive styling options and pre-built components compared to Skeleton, making it more suitable for complex or visually rich designs.
Components: While Skeleton focuses on providing a lightweight framework with essential components, Sauron includes a wider range of components and elements for building versatile and feature-rich websites.
Customization: Sauron allows for deeper customization through SASS variables and mixins, while Skeleton offers limited customization options out of the box.
Documentation: Sauron provides more comprehensive and detailed documentation, including examples and usage guidelines, compared to the minimalistic documentation of Skeleton.

Skeleton vs sauron (framework)

Overview