Scene.js vs Vanilla.JS

Overview

Vanilla.JS

Stacks82

Followers85

Votes9

Scene.js

Stacks2

Followers18

Votes3

GitHub Stars2.8K

Forks162

Scene.js vs Vanilla.JS: What are the differences?

<Scene.js is a JavaScript library for creating animations and interactive web experiences. Vanilla.JS, on the other hand, refers to using plain JavaScript without any libraries or frameworks. Here are the key differences between Scene.js and Vanilla.JS:>

Syntax and Ease of Use: Scene.js provides a simpler syntax and intuitive API for creating animations, making it easier for beginners to get started. Vanilla.JS requires more code and effort to achieve similar animations, especially for complex scenarios.
Animation Capabilities: Scene.js offers advanced animation features such as timelines, keyframes, and easing functions out of the box, making it suitable for creating intricate and dynamic animations. Vanilla.JS requires manual implementation of these features, resulting in more verbose code and complexity.
Performance: Scene.js is optimized for performance, utilizing techniques like requestAnimationFrame and CSS transitions for smooth animations. Vanilla.JS animations may not be as efficient, especially for large-scale projects or animations that require high frame rates.
Cross-browser Compatibility: Scene.js handles browser inconsistencies and vendor prefixes internally, ensuring animations work consistently across different browsers. Vanilla.JS developers need to handle these compatibility issues manually, which can be time-consuming and error-prone.
Community and Support: Scene.js has a dedicated community and documentation to help users troubleshoot issues and learn new techniques. Vanilla.JS relies on general JavaScript resources and may lack specific support for animation-related questions or problems.
Learning Curve: Scene.js abstracts many animation complexities, making it easier for novices to create animations quickly. Vanilla.JS offers more flexibility and control but has a steeper learning curve, requiring a solid understanding of JavaScript and animation principles.

In summary, while Scene.js simplifies the process of creating animations and interactive web experiences with its intuitive API and advanced features, Vanilla.JS provides more control and flexibility but requires more effort and expertise to implement complex animations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vanilla.JS	Scene.js
It is a fast and cross-platform framework for building incredible, powerful JavaScript applications. it is the most lightweight framework available anywhere.	It is a JavaScript Animation Library For creating animated websites. It can control multiple elements at the same time. It supports a variety of value types, such as CSS, and can be handled in JavaScript.
-	Powerful CSS animation; Control progress; Support SVG animation; Multiple timeline
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 2.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 162
Stacks 82	Stacks 2
Followers 85	Followers 18
Votes 9	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Lightweight 2 Web-components 1 NO CONVENTIONS 1 Unopinionated 1 Easy to learn Cons 2 You need to build anything yourself	Pros 3 Powerful Animation
Integrations
No integrations available	JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Vanilla.JS, Scene.js?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Scene.js vs Vanilla.JS: What are the differences?

Syntax and Ease of Use: Scene.js provides a simpler syntax and intuitive API for creating animations, making it easier for beginners to get started. Vanilla.JS requires more code and effort to achieve similar animations, especially for complex scenarios.
Animation Capabilities: Scene.js offers advanced animation features such as timelines, keyframes, and easing functions out of the box, making it suitable for creating intricate and dynamic animations. Vanilla.JS requires manual implementation of these features, resulting in more verbose code and complexity.
Performance: Scene.js is optimized for performance, utilizing techniques like requestAnimationFrame and CSS transitions for smooth animations. Vanilla.JS animations may not be as efficient, especially for large-scale projects or animations that require high frame rates.
Cross-browser Compatibility: Scene.js handles browser inconsistencies and vendor prefixes internally, ensuring animations work consistently across different browsers. Vanilla.JS developers need to handle these compatibility issues manually, which can be time-consuming and error-prone.
Community and Support: Scene.js has a dedicated community and documentation to help users troubleshoot issues and learn new techniques. Vanilla.JS relies on general JavaScript resources and may lack specific support for animation-related questions or problems.
Learning Curve: Scene.js abstracts many animation complexities, making it easier for novices to create animations quickly. Vanilla.JS offers more flexibility and control but has a steeper learning curve, requiring a solid understanding of JavaScript and animation principles.

Scene.js vs Vanilla.JS

Overview