StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Scoop.sh vs TortoiseSVN

Scoop.sh vs TortoiseSVN

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TortoiseSVN
TortoiseSVN
Stacks54
Followers117
Votes3
GitHub Stars43
Forks30
Scoop.sh
Scoop.sh
Stacks24
Followers29
Votes0

Scoop.sh vs TortoiseSVN: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Scoop.sh and TortoiseSVN

Scoop.sh and TortoiseSVN are two popular software tools used for different purposes. Here are the key differences between them:

  1. Installation Process: Scoop.sh is a package manager for Windows operating system, allowing easy installation of various command-line tools and applications. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN is a Subversion client for Windows, used for version control of source code files. The installation process for Scoop.sh involves command-line execution, while TortoiseSVN has a graphical installer.

  2. Purpose and Functionality: Scoop.sh is primarily used for managing command-line applications and tools on Windows, making it easier to install, update, and remove them. It provides a consistent and efficient way for developers to set up their development environment. In contrast, TortoiseSVN is specifically designed for version control, allowing users to manage revisions, branches, and merges of files and directories.

  3. User Interface: Scoop.sh mainly relies on the command-line interface for performing operations. It provides a command-line shell to execute commands related to installation, uninstallation, and updating of applications. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, provides a graphical user interface integrated with Windows Explorer, allowing users to perform version control operations using familiar file explorer interactions.

  4. Repositories: Scoop.sh uses its own repository to store application packages, which are maintained and updated by the community. Users can easily add or remove repositories to access a wide range of applications. In contrast, TortoiseSVN operates in collaboration with a central Subversion repository, where users can check out, commit, and update code changes. This central repository ensures synchronization and version control for multiple users working on the same project.

  5. Collaboration and Teamwork: Scoop.sh focuses on individual developers and their personal development environment. It allows users to install and manage applications without worrying about collaboration with other team members. In contrast, TortoiseSVN is designed for collaboration and teamwork, providing features like merging code changes, resolving conflicts, and tracking file histories, facilitating seamless cooperation among multiple developers.

  6. Integration with Development Tools: Scoop.sh integrates well with various development tools and environments, allowing developers to quickly set up their preferred command-line tools within their development workflow. TortoiseSVN integrates with popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) like Visual Studio, providing version control functionalities directly within the IDE.

In summary, Scoop.sh is a package manager for Windows with a focus on ease of installation and management of command-line applications, while TortoiseSVN is a Subversion client for Windows specifically designed for version control and facilitating collaboration among developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TortoiseSVN
TortoiseSVN
Scoop.sh
Scoop.sh

It is an Apache™ Subversion (SVN)® client, implemented as a Windows shell extension. It's intuitive and easy to use, since it doesn't require the Subversion command line client to run. And it is free to use, even in a commercial environment.

It installs programs to your home directory by default. So you don’t need admin permissions to install programs, and you won’t see UAC popups every time you need to add or remove a program.

Easy to use. all commands are available directly from the Windows Explorer;Powerful commit dialog. integrated spell checker for log messages;Per project settings;Integration with issue tracking systems; Helpful Tools;Available in many languages
GUI wizard-style installers;Scriptable;Minimal amount of friction
Statistics
GitHub Stars
43
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
30
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
54
Stacks
24
Followers
117
Followers
29
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Windows
Windows
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to TortoiseSVN, Scoop.sh?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase